Conectar
Labour companionship is a recommendation by WHO that health authorities enable women to choose a companion during labour to ensure a safe and dignified labour experience for the birthing woman. However, most healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries do not necessarily consider this maternal need, which hampers a positive maternal experience during labour.
This study aims to examine midwives' perception towards the involvement of male partners in labour companionship.
An exploratory phenomenological approach was chosen and semi-structured interviews were used for this study.
The four main themes identified in this study include ‘Understanding of male partners' involvement in labour companionship’, ‘Involvement of midwives in decision-making’, ‘Barriers to male partners' involvement in labour companionship’ and ‘Facilitators of male partners' involvement in labour companionship’.
This study found a lack of understanding among midwives of the significance of male partners' involvement in labour companionship; and the identification of hierarchical and authoritarian leadership as a barrier to midwives' participation in decision-making highlights the need for transformational leadership styles to empower midwives. Overall, the findings of this study can inform maternity care policy as well as resource development, education and professional training in the field of midwifery.
Advance Care Planning (ACP) has the potential to enhance end-of-life care and improve the allocation of healthcare resources for patients with cancer. However, its successful implementation requires considerable effort to overcome challenges and deliver health benefits. Healthcare providers and patients are key players in ACP, and their perceptions of the process must be understood to address implementation challenges effectively.
To identify barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation in Chinese oncology settings, providing a foundation for culturally appropriate healthcare strategies.
A qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Semi-structured interviews (n = 30) were conducted between April and August 2022 to synthesise the perspectives of nurses, physicians, patients with cancer and their families who had participated in ACP. Data were analysed using a directed qualitative content analysis approach, and reporting followed the SRQR guidelines.
Twenty implementation determinants were identified across four CFIR domains, including 13 barriers and 7 facilitators. Key barriers included limited adaptability of ACP to local cultural and family norms, high complexity of ACP processes, insufficient knowledge and skills among clinicians, unclear team responsibilities, low organisational readiness, limited resources and poor public awareness. Facilitators included strong team culture, clinician motivation, supportive leadership and alignment with national policies. Two determinants showed mixed influences: the relative advantage of ACP compared to existing practices, and the extent of collaboration with external organisations.
Our study highlights the challenges of implementing ACP in China, as well as the unique and specific barriers to implementation. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of context-specific determinants and offer actionable insights to inform the development of culturally tailored ACP implementation strategies in resource-limited healthcare settings.
To inform the development of implementation strategies to promote ACP in healthcare systems dominated by traditional medicine.
FreshRSS 