Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common symptom in cancer, and it is one of the distressing symptoms in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Information about side effects may exacerbate CINV due to the nocebo effect. This study aims to examine the efficacy of pharmacist-led enhanced support for coping with side effects during medication counselling, which includes providing information about side effects, with the goal of mitigating the nocebo effect and reducing CINV.

This multicentre exploratory open-label randomised controlled trial will examine the efficacy of pharmacist-led enhanced support for coping with the side effects of treatments during medication counselling in patients with advanced lung cancer. The control group will receive medication counselling as usual. The study population will consist of patients with advanced lung cancer who have not received chemotherapy and are receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy or equivalent chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the prevention of nausea, and the secondary endpoints include complete response (no vomiting event and no rescue medication), stress (objectively assessed using the salivary cortisol and immunoglobulin A), coping strategies and quality of life.

This study received approval from the medical ethics committee of Kansai Medical University. The results will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal, and the findings will be presented at international scientific conferences.

1.0, 18 Mar 2025

Registration number: UMIN000056068.

Premature birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Understanding perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards preterm births, and how these factors influence care provision at health facilities and at home is crucial for improving preterm newborns’ health outcomes.

We conducted an exploratory qualitative study at Batu and Meki communities in the East Shewa Zone of Oromia Region, Ethiopia. We conducted in-depth interviews (n=81) and focus group discussions (n=8) using semistructured guides. The study participants included women who had preterm births, family members, community members, healthcare workers and expert stakeholders. We audio-recorded, transcribed the interviews and coded the transcripts. We employed the socioecological model to present perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards preterm birth at individual, interpersonal, organisational and societal levels.

Giving birth to a preterm newborn is often associated with fear, stress, unhappiness, concern and worry. At the individual level, preterm newborns’ mothers often feel guilt and self-blame. Families tend to keep preterm birth a secret due to perceptions of ‘incompleteness’. At the interpersonal level, preterm newborns are often stigmatised and families are disappointed by mothers who give birth prematurely. However, some believe that preterm newborns are accepted within the community. At the organisational level, healthcare providers find the causes of preterm birth unpredictable, they do not consider preterm births prevalent, and consider some of them as abortion. There is also a common belief that preterm infants have a low survival rate, leading to the deprioritisation of their care. At the societal level, some believe preterm births are caused by divine will as punishment for sins committed by the mother, while others think they occur naturally. Preterm newborn’s death is often not acknowledged as true loss and families are discouraged from grieving.

Our study found that the beliefs, perceptions and attitudes surrounding preterm birth, held by families, communities, healthcare providers and society at large, influence the care that preterm newborn–mother dyads receive both at home and within health facilities. Addressing these requires a multifaceted approach targeted at deeply ingrained attitudes and perceptions.