by Sudim Sharma, Anjali Neupane, Dikshya Kandel, Pratibha Chalisay, Sabina Marasini, Budhi Setiawan, Deepak Chandra Bajracharya, Shyam Raj Upreti, Leela Khanal, Haruko Yokote, Chahana Singh, Kshitij Karki
BackgroundHome-Based Records (HBRs) are personal health documents intended to improve continuity of care and caregiver engagement across reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) services. In Nepal, both standalone (sHBR) and integrated (iHBR) models are implemented, yet comparative evidence on their utilization and implementation challenges is limited. This study examined utilization patterns and system-level barriers associated with sHBR in Madhesh Province and iHBR in Koshi Province.
MethodsWe conducted a comparative qualitative study with descriptive quantitative profiling between May 17 and August 27, 2024. A total of 100 semi-structured in-depth interviews were completed with caregivers, health workers, Female Community Health Volunteers, and program managers across two provinces. The study applied “kuragraphy,” an ethnographic approach integrating interviews and field observations to construct contextual case narratives. Socio-demographic data were analyzed descriptively using the statistical package for the social Sciences (SPSS). Informed by the Human Centered Design (HCD) approach, the qualitative data were thematically analyzed in Excel using the Journey to Health and Immunization (JTHI) framework.
ResultsCaregivers widely perceived HBRs as essential documents, primarily for immunization tracking and future service access. The iHBR was viewed as more comprehensive and user-friendly, particularly due to its illustrations, which improved comprehension among low-literacy users. However, understanding remained limited among illiterate and marginalized populations. Family involvement in record management was minimal and largely confined to mothers. Implementation barriers included inadequate training – particularly for iHBR use, limited decision-making authority among frontline health workers, incomplete documentation of non-immunization components, poor material quality of sHBR, and concerns regarding the sustainability of donor-supported iHBR initiatives.
ConclusionHBR utilization in Nepal is shaped by caregiver literacy, gender dynamics, and health-system readiness. Strengthening training, supportive supervision, user-centered design, and sustainable supply mechanisms will be essential to optimize HBR effectiveness and support equitable RMNCH service delivery.
Only symptomatic treatments are available for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), the second most common chronic neurodegenerative disease worldwide, and it is therefore imperative to identify disease-modifying interventions that can alter the course of the disease. Epidemiological studies in PD patients suggest that a Mediterranean diet is associated with better motor and non-motor symptoms, slower progression and reduced mortality. Few interventional studies, however, investigated the relationship between diet and PD severity and progression. This study aims to determine whether a Mediterranean nutritional intervention can benefit motor and non-motor symptoms experienced by PD patients. As a secondary aim, the effects of a modified Mediterranean diet on the immune system, metabolomics and microbiome will also be assessed.
This is an interventional, non-pharmacological, superiority, randomised, controlled, single-centre, masked study with two parallel groups to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified Mediterranean diet on motor and non-motor patient-reported symptoms. PD patients meeting inclusion criteria will be enrolled (44 participants, aged between 40 years and 85 years), block-randomised and split into two parallel arms to either maintain their usual diet (control) or follow a modified Mediterranean diet for 6 months (intervention).
Patient-reported symptomatology is the primary outcome, measured through the Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) I+II score. Secondary outcomes include the immunophenotype of circulating cells of the adaptive immune system, the nasal and faecal microbiome composition, faecal and urinary metabolites and the measurement of inflammatory and metabolic markers. Disease severity (MDS-UPDRS III), non-motor symptomatology (Non-Motor Symptoms Scale), participant’s well-being (36-Item Short Form Health Survey), gastrointestinal symptomatology (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life) and intensity of dopaminergic replacement therapy (levodopa equivalents) will also be assessed. Evaluations will be conducted before the start and at the end of the intervention.
The Ethical Committee ‘Comitato Etico Territoriale Lombardia 5’ first approved this study on 17 September 2024 Prot. Nr. 420/24. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed research papers and conference presentations.