In December 2022, a large population infected with COVID-19 emerged in China, including frontline nurses. To maintain the medical system's function, many infected nurses returned to work before full recovery. This study aims to examine the characteristics of work resumption behaviour among the infected nurses and its influencing factors.
A nationwide cross-sectional study utilising questionnaire data.
An indicator was developed to assess the work resumption behaviour: work resumption type (autonomous work resumption, constrained work resumption). As the possible influencing factors of work resumption type, professional commitment, organisational commitment and psychological capital were included and measured by the Professional Commitment Scale (PCS), Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ), and Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ). The logistic regression models were applied to estimate the association between the score of the PCS, OCQ, PCQ, and work resumption type.
A total of 30,062 nurses were included. The mean time of nurses returning to work after infection was 1.8 days, with 88.6% exhibiting autonomous work resumption behaviour. One standard deviation increment in the score of the PCS, OCQ, and PCQ was associated with a 41% (OR = 1.41), 29% (OR = 1.29) and 42% (OR = 1.42) average increase in the odds of having an autonomous work resumption, respectively.
The majority of nurses returned to work before full recovery during the pandemic. Elevated professional commitment, organisational commitment and psychological capital were associated with autonomous work resumption behaviour.
The large-scale work resumption in this emerging infectious disease outbreak demonstrated that the healthcare system should reevaluate nursing workforce growth targets for pandemics. It is still warranted for future research to explore the long-term effects of work resumption on individual and organisational levels.
Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2300067706 (January 8, 2023)
To synthesise qualitative evidence on how patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals perceive and respond to cancer-related anorexia (CRA), and to develop a multi-level framework for improving CRA care.
A qualitative meta-synthesis using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, informed by the Social Ecological Model (SEM).
Seven databases were searched for qualitative studies from inception to April 2025. Studies were assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Meta-aggregation was used to synthesise findings, and the ConQual method assessed confidence levels.
PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CNKI and WanFang.
Seventeen studies from 10 countries were included, reflecting the perspectives of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals. Four synthesised findings were identified. At the individual level, CRA was linked to physical decline, emotional distress and changes in identity. The interpersonal level involved feeding-related tensions and caregiver burden. Organisational barriers included delayed care and poor cultural responsiveness. Policy-level factors such as limited insurance coverage and rural access further impeded care. Overall confidence in these synthesised findings was low to moderate.
CRA is not solely a biological condition but a multidimensional experience. Addressing CRA requires integrated and context-sensitive strategies across personal, relational, organisational and policy domains.
Nurses and clinicians should address not only physical symptoms but also the emotional and social dimensions of eating. Structured support for caregivers and improved service access, particularly in underserved settings, are needed.
This study provides a multi-level understanding of CRA. The findings support better patient care, caregiver support and more equitable healthcare policy design.
JBI methodology and ENTREQ guideline.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
PROSPERO Database: CRD420251041265