To examine the trajectories, core characteristics, and maintenance factors of social avoidance in patients with breast cancer during the first postoperative year.
Longitudinal, explanatory sequential mixed-method design.
This longitudinal study enrolled 176 postoperative breast cancer patients, conducting six follow-up assessments over 1 year. Latent class growth analysis was employed to identify heterogeneous trajectories of social avoidance behaviour, with multivariate logistic regression subsequently analyzing predictive factors. Building on these quantitative findings, semi-structured in-depth interviews were administered to target individuals identified through the analysis. Phenomenological methods were then utilized to elucidate core manifestations and maintenance factors of social avoidance.
Among the 176 enrolled breast cancer patients, 138 completed all six follow-up assessments. Latent class growth analysis identified two distinct subgroups with significant differences in social avoidance trajectories: ‘persistent high social avoidance’ and ‘persistent low social avoidance group’. Logistic regression revealed melancholic temperament as an independent risk factor for ‘persistent high social avoidance group’, while choleric temperament demonstrated protective effects. Phenomenological analysis of qualitative data systematically identified four core themes: (1) affective manifestations, (2) behavioural patterns, (3) psychological drivers, and (4) environmental determinants of social avoidance.
This study revealed heterogeneous dynamic trajectories of social avoidance behaviour in breast cancer patients, with core manifestations encompassing both affective and behavioural dimensions, sustained by multiple factors of personality, psychology, and environment.
This mixed-methods study systematically examined the developmental trajectories, core manifestations, and sustaining factors of social avoidance behaviour in breast cancer patients. The results provide robust evidence to inform precision screening for social avoidance risk, early prevention initiatives, and tailored intervention strategies in clinical nursing practice.
Journal article reporting standards for mixed-methods research.
No patient or public contribution.
To consolidate the best evidence on digital therapeutic interventions for self-management in patients with hip fragility fractures, providing a foundational guide for clinicians in developing digital therapy-based self-management plans.
Integrative review.
A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across multiple databases, including UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Joanna Briggs Institute, Health and Clinical Excellence, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Chinese databases like China National Knowledge Infrastructure and SinoMed. This study retrieved papers published from the establishment of the database to September 2023.
Studies were selected based on inclusion criteria, such as relevance to hip fragility fractures and self-management through digital therapies. Quality assessments were conducted independently by two reviewers using established tools for each type of study, ensuring the inclusion of high-quality evidence.
Fifteen studies were included: 4 guidelines, 5 expert consensus documents, 5 systematic reviews and 1 evidence summary. From these, 26 best practices were identified across 4 domains: digital design, self-management influencing factors, intervention plans and intervention content.
This integrative review provides a comprehensive, evidence-based summary of digital therapeutic interventions for self-management in patients with hip fragility fractures. The findings offer healthcare professionals a scientific basis for integrating digital therapy into clinical practice, highlighting its potential to enhance patient self-management.
This review underscores the value of digital therapies in empowering patients to take an active role in their rehabilitation, potentially improving adherence to self-management strategies and long-term outcomes.
No patient or public contribution was used for this study.