Effects of manufacturing modality, primer, and adhesive polymerization on the shear bond strength of customized lingual brackets to glazed zirconia: An <i>in vitro</i> study

by Viet Anh Nguyen, Ngo The Minh Pham, Minh Ngoc Tran, Thi Bich Ngoc Ha, Thi Quynh Trang Vuong

Introduction

Bonding fixed appliances to zirconia restorations is challenging, yet adult orthodontics increasingly involves ceramic crowns and patient-driven esthetic choices such as lingual appliances. Customized lingual brackets may improve fit and reduce adhesive thickness, but evidence on their bonding to zirconia is limited.

Materials and methods

This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength of customized lingual brackets bonded to glazed zirconia after airborne-particle abrasion. Bracket manufacturing was either three-dimensionally (3D) printed cobalt-chromium or cast nickel-chromium. Primers were a universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal, 3M) or a primer containing 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate Z-Prime Plus (Bisco), and adhesives were a light-cure orthodontic composite or a dual-cure resin cement. One hundred twenty-eight specimens (n = 16 per group) were tested. Shear bond strength was analyzed with three-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc Tukey tests. Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores were evaluated with ordinal regression. Significance was set at α = 0.05.

Results

Manufacturing modality significantly affected bond strength, with additively manufactured cobalt-chromium exceeding cast nickel-chromium (P = 0.049). The primer category and polymerization mode showed no significant main effects (P > 0.20) and no significant interactions. Group means clustered 9–10 MPa, and all combinations met the clinically accepted threshold. Additively manufactured brackets exhibited lower ARI scores than cast brackets (P  Conclusions

On glazed, sandblasted zirconia, shear bond strength of customized lingual brackets showed a borderline main effect of fabrication method, whereas primer type and adhesive polymerization mode were not statistically significant. Failures were predominantly located at or near the zirconia–adhesive interface. Within this in vitro model, base manufacturing may warrant attention, whereas primer and curing mode may be selected for handling and workflow considerations, with clinical relevance yet to be established.