Conectar
The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) predicts adverse outcomes in chronic diseases, but its prognostic value for major adverse limb events (MALE) in elderly patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unverified; thus, this study aimed to establish the association between GNRI and MALE.
A multicenter, prospective study.
From January 2021 to August 2022, 1200 patients with PAD aged ≥ 60 years were enrolled. Patients were stratified by GNRI value (At-risk group: ≤ 98 vs. No-risk group: > 98). Data were analysed through Kaplan–Meier curves, multivariable Cox regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) modelling, and subgroup analyses.
Among 1036 completers (13.7% attrition rate), 275 (26.5%) developed MALE during a mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 8.0 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly higher MALE incidence in patients in the At-risk group (log-rank p < 0.001). Adjusted Cox models revealed a 45% increased MALE risk in patients in the At-risk group (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12–1.86, p = 0.005). RCS identified a non-linear L-shaped relationship (p = 0.006) with inflection at GNRI = 95: Below 95, each 1-unit GNRI increase reduced MALE risk by 9% (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88–0.95, p < 0.001), while no significant association existed above 95. Subgroup analyses confirmed consistency across subgroups (all p-interaction > 0.05).
GNRI exhibits a non-linear L-shaped association with MALE risk in elderly patients with PAD, demonstrating critical prognostic utility below the 95 inflection point. Routine GNRI monitoring should be prioritised for patients with GNRI < 95 to guide preventive interventions.
GNRI should be incorporated as a routine risk assessment tool for elderly patients with PAD, with particular vigilance required for those with GNRI < 95. Prioritising nutritional screening and intervention in patients with GNRI < 95 may potentially improve clinical outcomes.
Patients contributed to this study by completing follow-up assessments.
This study followed the STROBE guidelines.
To identify whether cognitive appraisal and coping style have moderating and mediating effects on the relationship between family resilience and quality of life (QoL) in patients with acute leukaemia (AL).
AL is a clonal and aggressive haematological malignancy that requires long-term and continuous therapy, which may negatively influence QoL. Family resilience can be used as a psychosocial resource that may enhance patients' coping processes and QoL.
This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among hospitalised patients with AL from June 2022 to June 2023.
A cross-sectional study was performed following the STROBE Statement. Convenience sampling was used in the present study, and 286 patients were recruited from five tertiary Grade A hospitals in Xi'an, China. The questionnaires included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), the Cognitive Appraisal of Health Scale (CAHS), the Trait Coping Style Questionnaire (TCSQ) and the Family Hardiness Index (FHI). We used SPSS 26.0 and Hayes' PROCESS macro for data analyses and path coefficients.
The QoL of patients with AL was significantly positively correlated with family resilience and positive coping, and negatively correlated with cognitive appraisal. Cognitive appraisal partially mediated the relationship between family resilience and QoL. Positive coping moderated the relationships between family resilience and cognitive appraisal, and between cognitive appraisal and QoL.
The results revealed that the association between family resilience and QoL was partially mediated by cognitive appraisal and that positive coping moderated this relationship. These findings are meaningful for early interventions that reduce the risk of psychosocial distress and improve QoL in this population.
Nurses should focus on the cognitive appraisal and coping style of AL patients and provide family support and respect to improve their QoL.
This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on patients with AL undergoing clinical chemotherapy in Chinese medical facilities.
Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), a chronic inflammatory disease, affects the sacrococcygeal soft tissue, especially in young adults. The ideal treatment for PSD remains divergence. This study evaluated the application of a simplified modified Limberg flap combined with vacuum-assisted closure for treating PSD.
This prospective study was conducted from 1 June 2017 to 31 March 2022 in Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. The study included 88 male patients (91.7%) and 8 female patients (8.3%). The 96 patients ranged in age from 15 to 34 years (mean ± SD, 23 ± 4.4). Under general anaesthesia, all patients underwent simplified modified Limberg flap reconstruction with vacuum-assisted closure. The patient's weight, surgical time, extubation time, hospital stay, time to return to normal life or work, wound infection, wound dehiscence and recurrence rate were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Vancouver scar score were used to score patients' pain and scars in the surgical area.
The volume of resected diseased tissue was 13.5–120 (mean ± SD, 34.993 ± 24.406) cm2. The average surgical time during the treatment period was 97.68 ± 18.72 min, and the average extubation time was (6.36 ± 1.55) days, the mean hospital stay was 19.4 days; no patients were lost to follow-up. None of the patients experienced post-operative recurrence, wound infection, seroma or hematoma. Six patients (6.3%) experienced wound dehiscence at the flap tip around the natal cleft. The mean time to the resumption of daily activities was 26.3 days. The average VAS pain score was (6.00 ± 1.53) points, and the average Vancouver scar score was (5.96 ± 1.51) points, 12 patients (12.5%) were dissatisfied with their aesthetic results, and the average beauty satisfaction score is (6.64 ± 1.28) points.
Simplified modified Limberg flap reconstruction with vacuum-assisted closure surgery is an effective and innovative method for the treatment of PSD, with a low recurrence rate and rapid recovery.
Operative site wound infection is one of the most frequent infections in surgery. A variety of studies have shown that the results of laparoscopy might be superior to those of an open procedure. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of clarity as to whether there is a difference between open and laparoscopy with respect to the occurrence of wound infections in different paediatric operations. In this review, we looked at randomized, controlled studies that directly measured the rate of wound infection following an appendectomy with a laparoscope. We looked up four main databases for randomized, controlled studies that compare the treatment of paediatric appendicitis with laparoscopy. The surgeries included appendectomy. Through our search, we have determined 323 related papers and selected five qualified ones to be analysed according to the eligibility criteria. Five trials were also assessed for the quality of the documents. In the 5 trials, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of post-operative wound infection among the paediatric appendectomy and the open-access group (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34–1.15, p = 0.13). The four trials did not show any statistically significant difference in abdominal abscesses among the laparoscopic and open-access treatment groups (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.90–3.01, p = 0.11). The four trials did not reveal any statistically significant difference in operating time (mean difference, −4.36; 95% CI, −17.31 to 8.59, p = 0.51). In light of these findings, the use of laparoscopy as compared with the open-approach approach in paediatric appendectomies is not associated with a reduction in the risk of wound infection.
Ultrasound (US) has traditionally been recognised for its imaging capabilities, but its emerging role as a therapeutic modality in postoperative wound management, especially in paediatric care, has garnered significant attention. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the influence of US on postoperative wound healing and infection rates in paediatric patients. From an initial pool of 1236 articles, seven were deemed suitable for inclusion. Postoperative wound healing was assessed using the Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, and Approximation (REEDA) scale. Notably, there was a significant difference in wound healing patterns between the US-treated and control groups (I 2 = 94%, standardized mean difference [SMD]: −4.60, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: −6.32 to −2.88, p < 0.01), as illustrated in Figure 4. Additionally, a marked difference in wound infection rates was observed between the groups (I 2 = 93%, SMD: −5.86, 95% CIs: −9.04 to −2.68, p < 0.01), as portrayed in Figure 5. The findings underscore the potential benefits of US in enhancing postoperative wound healing and reducing infection rates in paediatric surgical settings. However, the application of US should be judicious, considering the nuances of individual patient needs and clinical contexts.
FreshRSS 