Conectar
To (1) examine the attitudes of community-dwelling adults towards death and their ability to cope with death, as well as (2) understand the influence of advance care planning on community-dwelling adults' death attitudes and coping with death.
A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted in Singapore.
In Phase I, a case–control study was conducted to examine the differences in death attitudes and coping with death ability between community-dwelling adults who have completed advance care planning and those who have not. A univariate general linear model was used to compute the mean difference in death attitudes and coping with death scores. In Phase II, a descriptive qualitative study was conducted to provide an in-depth understanding of the influence of advance care planning among community-dwelling adults. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative analysis. Mixed-methods analysis was conducted to integrate the quantitative and qualitative data.
In Phase I, 80 community-dwelling adults who had completed advance care planning and 81 community-dwelling adults who did not have advance care planning were included. Adults who had completed advance care planning had significantly higher coping with death scores (t = 4.14, p < 0.01). In Phase II, a purposive sample of 24 adults who had completed advance care planning was selected for individual semi-structured interviews. From the thematic analysis, three themes were developed: (1) Advance care planning enables coping with death, (2) overcoming fear of death with advance care planning and (3) confronting death with advance care planning.
Advance care planning may influence death attitudes and coping with death. Further work on longitudinal designs and among individuals from different age groups should be used to gain further in-depth understanding of the impacts of advance care planning.
Strategies to enhance one's coping abilities with death and death attitudes should be developed to stimulate the uptake of advance care planning.
This paper was reported according to the Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study framework.
Community-dwelling adults participated in the survey and interviews.
The effect of prehabilitation on reducing the level of postoperative stress and facilitating recovery has been proven to be controversial in previous studies involving patients with cancer. This review contributes to the improvement of an intervention programme by qualitatively integrating the prehabilitation experiences of patients with cancer.
This review aimed to integrate the individual experiences of patients with cancer who had received prehabilitation interventions to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementation, which can be used to understand patients' adherence behaviours.
This was a qualitative evidence synthesis review.
Articles were systematically searched from inception to February 18, 2025, using four English databases and three Chinese databases. Keywords and Medical Subject Headings were used to identify potential studies written in both Chinese and English. This study was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative systematic review methodology.
Twenty-five articles were included in this review. Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), eight synthesised findings were extracted, focusing on the representation of factors influencing the adherence of patients with cancer to prehabilitation, including the domains of knowledge (two facilitators), reinforcement (two facilitators), beliefs about consequences (two facilitators), beliefs about capabilities (two barriers), environmental context and resources (two barriers, one intervention preference factor), social influence (one facilitator, one intervention preference factor), emotion (one barrier, one facilitator) and behavioural regulation (one facilitators, two intervention preference factors).
Our findings indicate that the adherence to prehabilitation among patients with cancer is shaped by a dynamic interplay of determinants. Structured assessments, self-monitoring, tailored interventions and tele-prehabilitation can improve patients' self-efficacy, perceived benefits and access to resources, which in turn can facilitate their completion of prehabilitation.
This study deepens our understanding of behaviours related to adherence to prehabilitation among patients with cancer and provides valuable guidance for the formulation and optimisation of subsequent prehabilitation intervention programmes.
ENTREQ.
No patient or public contributions.
PROSPERO CRD: 42024553972
To evaluate and summarize the available evidence on the prevention and management of nasogastric aspiration in critically ill patients to inform the development of evidence-based clinical practice.
This study was an evidence summary according to the evidence summary reporting standard of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing.
According to the ‘6S’ model of evidence resources, evidence on the prevention and management of aspiration in critically ill patients on nasogastric feeding was retrieved, including clinical decision-making, best practices, guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensus and systematic evaluations.
UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, JBI, National Guideline Clearing-house, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, Yi Mai tong Guidelines Network, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, OVID, Sinomed, CNKI, Wan Fang database. The search period was from January 2013 to June 2023.
We included a total of 30 high-quality articles and summarized 36 pieces of evidence from them. These pieces of evidence covered 11 dimensions of multidisciplinary management, aspiration risk assessment, tube location, nutritional infusion management, position management, airway management, and oral hygiene. The level of evidence in the study was predominantly level 1 and level 5, with 27 pieces of evidence recommended as ‘strong’ and 9 pieces of evidence recommended as ‘weak’.
This study summarizes 36 pieces of evidence on preventing and managing aspiration in critically ill patients with nasogastric feeding. But the characteristics of hospitals should be considered in the application of future evidence.
Aspiration is the most serious complication during nasogastric feeding, which seriously affects the prognosis of patients. Preventing and managing aspiration in nasogastric patients has proven to be a challenging clinical problem. This study summarized 36 pieces of best evidence in 11 dimensions, including multidisciplinary team, assessment and identification, line position, feeding management, and so on. The implementation of these evidences is conducive to standardizing the operation behaviour of nasogastric feeding in clinical medical staff and reducing the occurrence of aspiration.
This research followed the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing.
The registration number is ‘ES20221368’.
FreshRSS 