Conectar
This integrative review aimed to describe the postoperative wound care practices and knowledge of nurses in acute care settings. Whittemore and Knafl's framework was used to identify and synthesise relevant studies. Full-text, primary articles published after 2000, focusing on postoperative wound care by nurses in hospital settings, were included. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for qualitative and quantitative studies and the Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) 2.0 for quality improvement (QI) studies. Five databases were searched (MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase and Web of Science) in August 2024. Of the 5329 studies, 36 articles were included. Inductive content analysis was used for data synthesis. Three categories were identified: Variation in using a holistic approach impacts optimal wound care practice, nurses' surgical wound care practices are shaped by individual factors, organisational support, and resource availability, and nurses' participation in surgical wound care is influenced by role clarity and multidisciplinary collaboration. In conclusion, this integrative review highlights that acute care nurses predominantly focused on technical dressing procedures with limited emphasis on comprehensive assessment, documentation, nutrition and patient education. Therefore, adopting a more holistic approach in surgical wound care could minimize practice variations among nurses.
To describe the cumulative incidence and characteristics of hospital-acquired pressure injury in acute palliative patients.
Secondary data analysis of hospital-acquired pressure injuries during 2019–2022.
The setting was a palliative care unit at a tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia, including adult (≥ 18 years) acute-phase palliative inpatients. Retrospective data from four databases were used to identify and analyse hospital-acquired pressure injury cases from 2019 to 2022. Clinical characteristics of patients with and without hospital-acquired pressure injury were compared.
The incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury in acute palliative care patients was 3.9% over the 4 years. These patients were predominantly male, with an average age of 74 years, with 66 of 78 cases developing in the deteriorating palliative care phase. Using the Waterlow Score, 51.3% of patients were assessed as at very high risk of pressure injury. Ninety-five hospital-acquired pressure injuries were reported in 78 patients; 16.8% were medical device-related, 40% were Stage 1 injuries, and the most common injury sites were the sacrum, heels and genitals. Patients with hospital-acquired pressure injury had significantly higher (worse) scores on both the palliative care Resource Utilisation Group-Activities of Daily Living and Problem Severity Scores. Regression analysis identified a high Problem Severity Score on admission as a significant predictor for hospital-acquired pressure injury development.
The incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury in acute palliative patients is lower than in previous studies. However, many injuries occurred in those in the deteriorating phase, with higher scores for severity of symptoms. These findings suggest that acute palliative patients do require nursing care for pressure injury prevention, as well as for symptom management and activities-of-daily-living. Overall, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of pressure injury incidence and characteristics for acute palliative care patients. Future research should focus on population-specific pressure injury risk assessment to explore risk factors in greater detail.
Current pressure injury risk assessment tools, like the Waterlow Score, may not provide the comprehensive evaluation needed for the acute palliative care cohort. To better address the unique needs of this cohort, it may be necessary to refine existing tools or develop new instruments that integrate palliative-specific assessments, such as the Resource Utilisation Group-Activities-of-Daily-Living (RUG-ADL) and Problem (symptom) Severity Score (PSS). These adaptations could help improve pressure injury prevention care planning and enhance outcomes for patients in this setting.
This study separated acute palliative care patients from those at end-of-life and found a 3.9% cumulative incidence of pressure injuries. There were no significant differences in age, gender, or cancer diagnosis between patients with and without injuries. Patients without injuries were more likely to be in the deteriorating phase, while those with injuries had higher (worse) RUG-ADL scores. Regression analysis showed that each one-point increase in the PSS (symptom severity) made patients 1.2 times more likely to develop a pressure injury. The findings suggest that combining a validated risk assessment tool with the RUG-ADL and PSS tools could provide a more accurate risk assessment for hospitalised acute palliative care patients.
STROBE reporting guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 