Conectar
The best evidence on programmed weaning from mechanical ventilation in neurocritical care patients should be gathered, evaluated, and integrated to provide an evidence basis for determining the optimal weaning program for these patients.
According to the ‘6S’ pyramid model of evidence-based practice resources, Chinese and international guideline websites, websites of relevant professional societies, and Chinese and English databases were systematically searched. The databases were searched from the time of establishment to October 2024. Literature screening was subsequently performed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two researchers independently evaluated the literature quality and extracted and summarised the evidence.
A total of 21 publications were included, including 3 guidelines, 5 expert consensus papers, 1 evidence summary, and 12 systematic reviews. A total of 29 pieces of best evidence in the following 5 aspects were summarised: preweaning preparation and screening, a weaning protocol, extubation assessment, extubation preparation and procedure, and postextubation management.
This study summarises the best evidence for the programmed weaning of neurocritical care patients from mechanical ventilation and provides a basis for clinical medical personnel to standardise this weaning process. Evidence-based application of these strategies should be implemented to verify their clinical efficacy and safety in practice.
Successful weaning is key in the management of neurocritical care patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The establishment of a localised extubation protocol guided by a multidisciplinary team can significantly reduce the extubation failure rate, the duration of mechanical ventilation and the incidence of related complications. However, evidence-based application is needed to verify the efficacy and safety of these strategies in clinical practice.
This evidence review adhered to the evidence review report guidelines formulated by the Evidence-Based Nursing Center of Fudan University. These guidelines cover aspects such as problem establishment, literature search, literature screening, literature evaluation, evidence summary and classification, as well as the formulation of practical suggestions. This evidence summary followed the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing (http://ebn.nursing.fudan.edu.cn) with registration number ES20244849.
This study was based on the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing; the registered name is ‘Summary of the best evidence for weaning from mechanical ventilation in neurocritical care patients’; the registration number is ES20231823
To identify factors associated with health behaviours among stroke survivors, through a multi-centre study.
A sequential mixed methods design.
In the quantitative research phase, a total of 350 participants were recruited through multi-stage sampling from December 2022 to June 2023. General information questionnaires, The Stroke Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire (SPKQ), Short Form Health Belief Model Scale (SF-HBMS), Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLPII), and the WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire, Brief Version) were distributed across five tertiary hospitals in Henan province, China. For the qualitative research component, semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore the barriers and facilitators of health behaviour. This study adheres to the GRAMMS guidelines.
A total of 315 participants (90.0%) completed the survey. Identified barriers to health behaviour included residing in rural areas, higher scores on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and mRS, as well as lower scores on SPKQ, SF-HBMS and WHOQOL-BREF. Twenty-four individuals participated in qualitative interviews. Twenty-eight themes were identified and categorised by frequency, covering areas such as knowledge, skills, intentions, social influences, social/professional role and identity, environmental context and resources, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences and behavioural regulation. Both quantitative and qualitative data suggested that health behaviour among stroke survivors is at a moderate level, and the identified barrier factors can be mapped into the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour).
The study indicates that key barriers to health behaviour among stroke survivors align with the COM-B model. These identified factors should be carefully considered in the planning of future systematic interventions aimed at improving health behaviours among stroke survivors.
Patients were invited to completed questionnaires in the study and semi-structured interviews. The investigators provided explanation of this study’ content, purpose and addressed issues during the data collection.
FreshRSS 