Chronic wounds decrease patients' quality of life and pose an economic burden on healthcare systems and individuals. Wound assessment tools and monitoring technologies may reduce the costs related to chronic wound management. Bioimpedance has attracted growing attention as a quantitative tool for monitoring chronic ulcers, owing to its proven ability to detect tissue changes throughout the wound healing process. The main objective of this study was to review the state-of-the-art literature on the use of bioimpedance in chronic wound monitoring. A systematic review of literature was performed on the 30th of August 2024 according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines in three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science). Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review. Studies on bioimpedance measurements for chronic lower leg wound monitoring were analysed, confirming significant differences in bioimpedance between wound and healthy skin, with changes observed throughout the healing process. The variety of electrode types and setups highlights the method's complexity, with electrode configuration playing a critical role in ensuring accurate results. Several challenges remain before it can be effectively implemented in clinical practice. Our review emphasises the potential usefulness of bioimpedance-based methods in monitoring chronic wounds on the lower legs.
In an ageing society, the incidence of hard-to-heal wounds is rising. Chronic wound healing is a complex process, which requires specialised treatment. Clinical assessment of the wound is essential to establish care approaches but is usually based on visual evaluation and it remains challenging. Therefore, innovative quantitative methods for the assessment of chronic wounds are needed. We conducted a single-centre observational study designed to assess the feasibility of a bioimpedance measurement method conducted with a multielectrode sensor array to monitor the wound healing process in patients with chronic wounds of venous, mixed venous–arterial and diabetic aetiology. In total, 104 measurements of bioimpedance were conducted in 18 ulcers during the study. Across all 7 patients analysed, the bioimpedance of the ulcers was consistently increasing as the wound surface was decreasing. The variables had significant (p < 0.001) and strong negative correlation (r = −0.86). We validated the feasibility of the bioimpedance measurement method for the monitoring of the wound healing process on the lower legs. It may be a promising quantitative method for monitoring the status of the wounds. However, long-term measurements are needed to show the usability of the electrode dressing and bioimpedance measurement in the assessment of chronic wounds.