Conectar
Burn injuries pose a significant challenge in resource-limited settings, particularly during humanitarian crises. This study examines the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of burn patients at a tertiary hospital in Damascus, Syria, from 2021 to 2024. A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted on 500 admitted burn patients. Data on demographics, injury characteristics, management, complications and mortality were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Mann–Whitney U tests and binary logistic regression. The lethal area 50% (LA50) was estimated using the logistic regression equation: LA50=−constant+∑bixibTBSA$$ LA50=-\frac{constant+\sum \left({b}_i{x}_i\right)}{b_{TBSA}} $$. The mean patient age was 20.5 ± 17.9 years, with a male predominance (55%). Flame burns (72.4%) at home (87.6%) were most common. The mean total body surface area burned was 30.99% ± 21.31%, with 68.6% being full-thickness injuries. The complication rate was 91%, with infection being most prevalent. The overall mortality rate was 39%, with sepsis (56.4%) as the leading cause. Logistic regression identified larger burn area (OR = 1.152, p < 0.001), full-thickness depth (ref. partial thickness, OR = 0.281, p < 0.001), older age and female gender as independent predictors of increased mortality. Deceased patients had significantly shorter hospital stays. LA50 was 42.63% for a 40-year-old male with a partial-thickness flame burn and a 10-day hospital stay; for a female with a full-thickness flame burn under the same conditions, it was 27.43%. This study reveals an alarmingly high burden of burn injuries in a crisis-affected setting, with extreme complication and mortality rates. The findings highlight the critical impact of extensive burns and sepsis, underscoring severe systemic constraints on care. Urgent context-specific interventions to strengthen acute burn management, infection control, and prevention strategies are imperative.
by Nurdiana Mohammad Hussin, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Idayu Badilla Idris, Azmawati Mohammed Nawi
Individuals with breast cancer (BC) experience significant psychological distress, yet their utilization of mental health services remains low. This study identified key factors influencing help-seeking behavior through integrated Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Health Belief Model (HBM) frameworks. We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with eight BC patients and nominal group technique (NGT) with six health professionals, followed by Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) to assess expert consensus. The IDIs revealed that the individuals with BC recognized the value of professional psychological support but were reluctant to engage with these services personally. The participants identified emotional thresholds for help-seeking, expressed preference for informal support networks, and demonstrated varied understanding of mental health professional roles. The FDM evaluation demonstrated strong expert consensus across all assessed elements, particularly those related to emotional support mechanisms. Three barrier categories emerged: individual factors (mental health literacy, autonomy preferences), social factors (family support, cultural stigma), and systemic factors (healthcare integration gaps). Expert consensus exceeded 80% agreement across all domains.This study identified a complex interplay between individual psychological barriers and systemic factors affecting mental health help-seeking among individuals with BC. Effective interventions must address psychological barriers and healthcare delivery factors while respecting individual autonomy in coping choices. A multi-level approach targeting individual education, family support systems, and healthcare integration is recommended to improve mental health service utilization among individuals with BC.
FreshRSS 