FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Digital Exclusion and Health Literacy Among Older Adults: The Mediating Effects of Social Support and Self‐Efficacy

ABSTRACT

Background

Digital exclusion has been linked to adverse health outcomes among older adults. However, its relationship with health literacy, a midstream determinant of health outcomes in aging populations, remains insufficiently explored.

Aim

To investigate the relationship between digital exclusion and health literacy among older adults, and to assess the mediating effects of social support and self-efficacy.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Methods

Data from the 2021 Psychology and Behaviour Investigation of Chinese Residents (PBICR) survey were used. Digital exclusion was assessed through self-reported non-use of computers or smartphones. Health literacy, social support and self-efficacy were measured using the Short-Form Health Literacy Instrument, the 12-item Perceived Social Support Scale and the New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Generalised linear models (GLM) were employed to examine the relationships between digital exclusion and health literacy, while mediation analysis with bootstrapping assessed the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy.

Results

A total of 1147 older adults participated in the study, with 27.64% identified as digitally excluded and a moderate level of health literacy. GLM analysis identified several significant factors influencing health literacy, including digital exclusion, social support, self-efficacy, higher education levels, household monthly income per capita > 3000 RMB, non-agricultural hukou, chronic conditions and medication use. Mediation analysis revealed that digital exclusion negatively impacted health literacy. Social support and self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between digital exclusion and health literacy.

Conclusion

Digital exclusion is negatively associated with health literacy among older adults, with social support and self-efficacy partially mediating the relationship.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

This study underscores the importance of addressing digital exclusion, as well as promoting social support and self-efficacy to enhance health literacy in ageing populations.

Impact

This study provides insights into the relationship between digital exclusion and health literacy among older adults, as well as the mediating effects of social support and self-efficacy, offering potential targets for health literacy improvement.

Reporting Method

STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology).

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution was involved.

Current Status and Influencing Factors of Death Preparedness in Advanced Cancer Patients Based on the PRECEDE‐PROCEED Model: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Background

Death preparedness is an important prerequisite for improving the quality of life and the quality of death in advanced cancer patients. However, research on the level of death preparedness in patients is insufficient, and there is little understanding of the current status and influencing factors of death preparedness in advanced cancer patients.

Aim

This study aims to assess the current status of death preparedness and its influencing factors in advanced cancer patients.

Methods

Based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, a structured survey questionnaire was designed to collect data on personal factors (such as gender, age and residence area), interpersonal factors (such as social support, caregiver readiness and healthcare worker readiness) and social factors (such as care resources, policy support and information supply). Through multiple linear regression and BP neural network analysis, the study explores the impact and significance of these influencing factors on death preparedness in advanced cancer patients.

Results

A total of 930 valid questionnaires were collected in this study. The death preparedness score in advanced cancer patients was 72.18 ± 22.82, indicating a moderate level, with the highest score being the ‘reflexive care’ dimension and the lowest score being the ‘hospice programme’ dimension. Multivariate analysis revealed that meaning in life and social support were the most significant predictors of death preparedness in advanced cancer patients. In addition, personal factors such as dignity, household income and coping style, also played an important role. Interpersonal factors like social support, as well as social factors such as care resources and policy support, also had an impact on patients' death preparedness to some extent.

Conclusion

Death preparedness in advanced cancer patients is generally at a moderate level, and death preparedness is influenced by a combination of personal factors, interpersonal factors and social factors.

Impact

This study is based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model to comprehensively explore the influencing factors of death preparedness in advanced cancer patients. It provides theoretical support for improving life services for advanced cancer patients. It offers valuable practical experience and insights for societal attention and reform in end-of-life care.

Patient or Public Contribution

No Patient or Public Contributions were included in this paper.

❌