Conectar
To understand how Registered Nurses perceive the impact of nursing leadership on managing moral distress and mitigating burnout.
Moral distress and burnout are pervasive issues in nursing, compromising well-being, patient safety and workforce sustainability. Leadership is a critical factor in shaping workplace culture and mitigating these challenges, yet evidence remains limited.
Qualitative systematic review.
A qualitative systematic review was conducted following JBI methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus identified 5927 articles, with two studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and synthesised via meta-aggregation. Confidence in findings was assessed using the ConQual approach.
Four major themes emerged: (1) Behind the barriers, (2) Breaking point, (3) Weathering the storm and (4) Leadership for lasting change. Leadership influenced nurses' psychological safety, ethical decision-making and resilience. Inadequate support amplified moral distress, and effective strategies included authentic communication, team solidarity and systemic interventions.
Leadership plays a pivotal role in mitigating moral distress and burnout. Evidence highlights the need for structural changes and support to sustain registered nurses' well-being and retention.
Findings offer direction for leadership strategies that promote ethical workplaces, shared decision-making and mental health supports to enhance resilience and patient care.
Strengthening leadership capability is vital for workforce sustainability, care quality and nurse retention.
Authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines.
This study did not involve patients or the public in its design, conduct or reporting.
Exploring the concept of patient agitation in the intensive care unit.
Patient agitation in the intensive care unit is of widespread concern and linked to negative outcomes for patients, staff, and family members. There is currently no consensus on what constitutes agitation in the intensive care context, hindering effective and tailored prevention and management.
Concept Analysis.
Walker and Avant's eight-step concept analysis approach.
A comprehensive search was carried out in the databases MEDLINE, PsychINFO and CINAHL. A total of 32 papers published between 1992 and 2023 were included, reviewed, and analysed to explore definitions, attributes, antecedents and consequences of patient agitation.
Patient agitation in the intensive care unit is characterised by excessive motor activity, emotional tension, cognitive impairment, and disruption of care, often accompanied by aggression and changes in vital signs. Antecedents encompass critical illness, pharmacological agents and other drugs, physical and emotional discomfort, patient-specific characteristics and uncaring staff behaviours. Consequences of agitation range from treatment interruptions and poor patient outcomes to the psychological impact on patients, families, and staff.
Agitation in the intensive care unit is a complex issue which significantly impacts patient treatment and clinical outcomes. For healthcare professionals, patient agitation can contribute to high workloads and job dissatisfaction. Due to the complex nature of agitation, clinicians must consider multifaceted strategies and not rely on medication alone. Further research is needed to fully understand patient agitation in the ICU. Such understanding will support the development of improved strategies for preventing and managing the behaviours.
A clearer understanding of patient agitation supports the development of tailored interventions that improve patient care, guide ICU training, and inform future research.
This concept analysis was developed with input from a patient representative.
FreshRSS 