Conectar
To examine if and how selected German hospitals use nurse-sensitive clinical indicators and perspectives on national/international benchmarking.
Qualitative study.
In 2020, 18 expert interviews were conducted with key informants from five purposively selected hospitals, being the first in Germany implementing Magnet® or Pathway®. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis with deductive-inductive coding. The study followed the COREQ guideline.
Three major themes emerged: first, limited pre-existence of and necessity for nurse-sensitive data. Although most interviewees reported data collection for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers and falls with injuries, implementation varied and interviewees highlighted the necessity to develop additional nurse-sensitive indicators for the German context. Second, the theme creating an enabling data environment comprised building clinicians' acceptance, establishing a data culture, and reducing workload by using electronic health records. Third, challenges and opportunities in establishing benchmarking were identified but most interviewees called for a national or European benchmarking system.
The need for further development of nurse-sensitive clinical indicators and its implementation in practice was highlighted. Several actions were suggested at hospital level to establish an enabling data environment in clinical care, including a nationwide or European benchmarking system.
Involving nurses in data collection, comparison and benchmarking of nurse-sensitive indicators and their use in practice can improve quality of patient care.
Nurse-sensitive indicators were rarely collected, and a need for action was identified. The study results show research needs on nurse-sensitive indicators for Germany and Europe. Measures were identified to create an enabling data environment in hospitals. An initiative was started in Germany to establish a nurse-sensitive benchmarking capacity.
Clinical practitioners and nurse/clinical managers were interviewed.
To evaluate staffing conditions, patient outcomes, quality of care, patient safety and nurse job outcomes in British Columbia (BC), Canada hospitals.
Cross-sectional study of 58 hospitals in BC with surveys of nurses and independent measures of patient outcomes.
58 hospitals in BC.
6685 hospital-based nurses working in a direct patient care role.
Hospital-wide and unit-specific patient-to-nurse staffing ratios derived from registered nurse reports of how many patients and how many nurses were on their unit during their last shift worked.
Objective patient outcome measures included the Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio (HSMR) and 30-day Readmission Rate, from 2022 to 2023 Canadian Institute for Health Information data. Nurses4All@BC provided data from 2024 using validated items on multiple measures (eg, nurse burnout, missed health breaks, intentions to leave, quality and safety measures such as culture of patient safety, quality of nursing care, missed nursing care).
Burnout (59.4%), missed health breaks (41.7%), job dissatisfaction (36.0%), intentions to leave (19.3%) and patient outcomes (HSMR mean 95.4, median 96.0, range 26–180; readmission rate mean 10.0%, median 9.5%, range 7.9%–13.8%) were high and varied across hospitals. 68.3% of nurses reported there were not enough staff, and 77.3% reported their workloads were unsafe for patients. 60.6% of nurses gave their hospital an unfavourable patient safety rating. More patients per nurse were associated with poorer hospital mortality and readmission rates, poorer job outcomes for nurses, more adverse events for patients, less favourable ratings of quality of care and patient safety, more missed nursing care and poorer ratings of staffing adequacy and management.
Given the variability in staffing, quality and patient outcomes across BC hospitals, the implementation of a minimum nurse-to-patient ratio policy has the potential to improve patient care safety and retention of nurses.
Evaluate the relationship between hospital nursing resources and outcomes among patients with chronic wounds.
Cross-sectional observational.
Hospital-level predictors included the nurse work environment, proportion of Bachelor of Science (BSN)-prepared nurses, and skill mix (i.e., registered nurses [RN] as proportion of nursing personnel). Outcomes included in-hospital and 30-day mortality, discharging to a higher level of care and length of stay. Individual-level nurse data were aggregated to create hospital-level measures of nursing resources. We utilised multi-level modelling with nurses nested within hospitals and outcomes at the patient level.
Three datasets from 2021: RN4CAST-New York/Illinois survey, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review claims and American Hospital Association Annual Survey.
The sample included 34,113 patients with chronic wounds in 215 hospitals in New York and Illinois. In adjusted models, a 1 standard deviation improvement in the work environment was associated with 12% lower odds of in-hospital mortality, 8% lower odds of discharging to a higher level of care and a shorter length of stay by a factor of 0.96. A 10% increase in BSN composition was associated with 8% reduced odds of in-hospital mortality and 6% reduced odds of 30-day mortality. A 10% increase in skill mix was associated with 12% lower odds of in-hospital mortality and a shorter length of stay by a factor of 0.91.
Improved nursing resources are associated with better outcomes among patients with chronic wounds.
Nurses manage the care of patients with chronic wounds; thus, hospital investment in nursing resources is imperative for good outcomes.
Modifiable hospital nursing resources are associated with outcomes among patients with chronic wounds, a complex population.
STROBE.
International evidence shows that nurses' work environments affect patient outcomes, including their care experiences. In Chile, several factors negatively affect the work environment, but they have not been addressed in prior research. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of the nurse work environment in Chilean hospitals and its association with patient experience.
A cross-sectional study of 40 adult general high-complexity hospitals across Chile.
Participants included bedside nurses (n = 1632) and patients (n = 2017) in medical or surgical wards, who responded to a survey. The work environment was measured through the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. Hospitals were categorized as having a good or poor work environment. A set of patient experience outcomes were measured through the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to test associations between the environment and patient experiences.
For all outcomes, the percentage of patients satisfied was higher in hospitals with good as compared to poor work environments. In good environment hospitals patients had significantly higher odds of being satisfied with communication with nurses (OR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.10–1.94, p = 0.010), with pain control (OR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.14–2.02, p = 0.004), and with nurses' timely responses in helping them to go to the bathroom (OR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.49–3.16, p < 0.0001).
Hospitals with good environments outperform hospitals with poor environments in most patient care experience indicators. Efforts to improve nurses' work environment hold promise for improving patient experiences in Chilean hospitals.
Hospital administrators and nurse managers should value, especially in the context of financial constraints and understaffing, the implementation of strategies to improve the quality of nurses´ work environments so that they can provide patients with a better care experience.
FreshRSS 