Conectar
by Navdeep Kaur, Marcus V. Merfa, Alexandra K. Kahn, Rodrigo P. P. Almeida, Leonardo De La Fuente
Xylella fastidiosa (Xf) is an insect-transmitted, xylem-limited bacterial plant pathogen that infects hundreds of plant species. This pathogen causes bacterial leaf scorch in southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrids) in the southeastern United States, a disease that has not yet been reported elsewhere. Previously, a comparative genomic analysis of Xf and ancestral host species identified evolutionary events of gene gain and loss related to host range specificity. Here, by using a similar workflow, we identified two loci that are significantly found in blueberry-infecting strains. Locus_1088 included a hypothetical protein and a small part of the N-terminus of an orphan RelE toxin, while Locus_2741 was annotated as a hypothetical protein. Using a protocol based on natural competence, mutants were generated in three Xf subsp. multiplex strains from blueberry. Less biofilm, more planktonic growth, and increased twitching motility as compared to its wild-type (WT) were observed for the strain LA-Y3C_1088 mutant. In blueberry virulence assays, the LA-Y3C_1088 mutant caused significantly more severe symptoms than LA-Y3C_WT, whereas no significant differences were observed for other mutated strains. Interestingly the mutation of Locus_1088 additionally disrupted a toxin (part of a toxin-antitoxin system) that is likely responsible for the phenotypic changes observed. However, because the two independent mutants were not generated, we could not determine whether the phenotype resulted from disruption of hypothetical protein or the toxin. Additionally, since the coffee-isolated but never tested in blueberry Xf subsp. fastidiosa strain CFBP8073 was found to encode the two blueberry-associated loci studied here, its virulence was assessed in blueberry. This strain caused severe symptoms comparable to the control strain AlmaEm3 from blueberry. Due to the complexity of understanding host specificity in Xf, any advance in identifying genetic markers for host specificity in this devastating pathogen could greatly improve management of Xf worldwide.
by Sudim Sharma, Anjali Neupane, Dikshya Kandel, Pratibha Chalisay, Sabina Marasini, Budhi Setiawan, Deepak Chandra Bajracharya, Shyam Raj Upreti, Leela Khanal, Haruko Yokote, Chahana Singh, Kshitij Karki
BackgroundHome-Based Records (HBRs) are personal health documents intended to improve continuity of care and caregiver engagement across reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) services. In Nepal, both standalone (sHBR) and integrated (iHBR) models are implemented, yet comparative evidence on their utilization and implementation challenges is limited. This study examined utilization patterns and system-level barriers associated with sHBR in Madhesh Province and iHBR in Koshi Province.
MethodsWe conducted a comparative qualitative study with descriptive quantitative profiling between May 17 and August 27, 2024. A total of 100 semi-structured in-depth interviews were completed with caregivers, health workers, Female Community Health Volunteers, and program managers across two provinces. The study applied “kuragraphy,” an ethnographic approach integrating interviews and field observations to construct contextual case narratives. Socio-demographic data were analyzed descriptively using the statistical package for the social Sciences (SPSS). Informed by the Human Centered Design (HCD) approach, the qualitative data were thematically analyzed in Excel using the Journey to Health and Immunization (JTHI) framework.
ResultsCaregivers widely perceived HBRs as essential documents, primarily for immunization tracking and future service access. The iHBR was viewed as more comprehensive and user-friendly, particularly due to its illustrations, which improved comprehension among low-literacy users. However, understanding remained limited among illiterate and marginalized populations. Family involvement in record management was minimal and largely confined to mothers. Implementation barriers included inadequate training – particularly for iHBR use, limited decision-making authority among frontline health workers, incomplete documentation of non-immunization components, poor material quality of sHBR, and concerns regarding the sustainability of donor-supported iHBR initiatives.
ConclusionHBR utilization in Nepal is shaped by caregiver literacy, gender dynamics, and health-system readiness. Strengthening training, supportive supervision, user-centered design, and sustainable supply mechanisms will be essential to optimize HBR effectiveness and support equitable RMNCH service delivery.
by Gift Treighcy Banda-Mtaula, Ibrahim Simiyu, Sangwani Nkhana Salimu, Stephen A. Spencer, Nateiya M. Yongolo, Marlen Chawani, Hendry Sawe, Jamie Rylance, Ben Morton, Adamson S. Muula, Eve Worall, Felix Limbani, Miriam Taegtmeyer, Rhona Mijumbi, on behalf of the Multilink consortium
Multimorbidity, the presence of multiple chronic health conditions, is a leading cause of death globally. In Malawi, chronic noncommunicable and communicable diseases such as HIV frequently co-exist, putting pressure on an under-resourced system. However, the health system is primarily structured around disease-specific [vertical] programs, which hinders person-centred care approaches to multimorbidity. Our study focuses on multimorbidity care and explores the perceptions of healthcare workers on the patient pathways and service organisation throughout the patient’s interaction with the health facilities. This cross-sectional qualitative study took an interpretivist approach. We conducted 13 days of clinical observations at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital and Chiradzulu District Hospital. We also conducted 13 days of clinical observations and semi-structured in-depth interviews with different cadres of purposively sampled healthcare workers (n = 22) at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital and Chiradzulu District Hospital. Through thematic analysis, we identified an understanding of the organisation of care and healthcare workers’ perspectives on the delivery of services. Findings showed both hospitals provided services for inpatients and outpatients with multimorbidity, including screening, management, prevention of secondary conditions and rehabilitation. Patient diagnosis and management for multimorbidity were often delayed due to frequent stockouts of medication and consumables necessary for diagnostic testing for NCDs at the hospital level. Some healthcare workers were not equipped with the knowledge, skills, or guidelines to manage multimorbidity. As HIV care is currently better resourced than other chronic conditions, healthcare facilities may strengthen the supply chain, healthcare workers’ training sessions and monitoring and evaluation tools to ensure NCDs are well managed, learning from HIV programmes.
To compare attitudes and perceptions towards opioid use disorder among people with opioid use disorder and emergency providers, describe interactions between the two groups, and identify barriers to providing and receiving care.
Mixed methods observational study.
Participants were recruited from an academic, tertiary care hospital and a community-based harm reduction agency in New England. Emergency healthcare providers (nurses, physicians, and paramedics) and adult people with opioid use disorder were enrolled. Electronic surveys were administered to providers, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with opioid use disorder and a subset of providers. Descriptive statistics were calculated for surveys, and directed content analysis was used to analyse semi-structured interviews.
Sixty-eight providers completed the survey, 11 of whom also completed a semi-structured interview. Twenty-two people with opioid use disorder completed the semi-structured interview. Both providers and people with opioid use disorder agreed that addiction is a disease; however, opinions differed on the extent to which personal choice played a role in the onset of opioid use disorder. Participants described how factors such as experiencing homelessness, alongside other personal or familial challenges, contributed to ongoing substance use and presented barriers to accessing healthcare. There was discordance in priorities between providers and people with opioid use disorder, which often drove conflict and perceived stigma. Both groups described physical and emotional trauma from prior interactions, which shaped expectations of future interactions and biases towards each other.
Educational initiatives should arm providers not only with clinical knowledge about opioid use disorder but with skills to recognize implicit biases, navigate unique barriers related to social determinants of health, and effectively deploy shared decision-making techniques. Healthcare organizations should provide support for trauma that emergency care providers are exposed to in caring for people with opioid use disorder.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ)–32 item checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
by Maria Grazia De Iorio, Michele Polli, Sara Ghilardi, Stefano Frattini, Mara Bagardi, Alessandra Paganelli, Maria Cristina Cozzi, Kenza Seghrouchni, Paola Giuseppina Brambilla, Giulietta Minozzi
Non-epidermolytic ichthyosis (NEI) is a hereditary skin disorder affecting several dog breeds, most notably the Golden Retriever. It is primarily caused by a loss-of-function variant in the PNPLA1 gene, while a second, less common form is associated with a deletion in the ABHD5 gene. This retrospective study aimed to assess the prevalence and temporal trends of both mutations in Golden Retrievers tested in Italy between 2017 and September 2025. A total of 508 genetic tests were analyzed, including 463 dogs tested for the PNPLA1 mutation, 42 for the ABHD5 deletion, and 3 for both variants. DNA was extracted from blood or buccal samples and analyzed by real-time PCR followed by confirmatory Sanger sequencing. Among the PNPLA1 tested dogs, 42% were clears (wt/wt), 37% carriers (wt/mut), and 21% affected (mut/mut), with calculated allele frequencies of 60% wild-type and 40% mutant. A significant temporal decline in mutant allele frequency was observed, accompanied by an increasing number of animals tested over time, suggesting growing interest in genetic screening and its impact on selective breeding. Conversely, all dogs tested for the ABHD5 deletion were wild-type, supporting its rarity in the breed. Overall, these findings confirm that PNPLA1-related ichthyosis remains one of the most prevalent hereditary disorders in Golden Retrievers, although its frequency is decreasing. The results emphasize the effectiveness of genetic testing in disease prevention and highlight the importance of continued monitoring to maintain genetic health within the breed.
The over 14 million African children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected (CHEU) are at risk for poor health outcomes, including neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism; however, no study to date has examined autism in CHEU in Africa, where the vast majority of these children live. Scalable diagnostic and neurobehavioural tools, including powerful, low-cost approaches such as eye-tracking, for detection and study of mechanistic neural processes are necessary to advance autism research in these settings. The objective of this study is to examine autism diagnostic outcomes and eye-tracking biomarkers in relation to CHEU while at the same time building capacity for neuro-health research in Kenya.
This study will leverage a longitudinally assessed cohort of CHEU and children who are HIV-unexposed and uninfected (CHUU) with well characterised HIV-related and contextual exposures. We will first determine and compare autism diagnostic outcomes between young CHEU and CHUU across a large cohort (n=850) of Kenyan children using research-grade autism assessment tools, and, second, determine whether neurobehavioural eye-tracking markers predict autism outcomes across this cohort.
Human subjects approvals have been obtained from Moi University Institutional Review and Ethics Committee (IREC; IREC/909/2024; Approval #0004835), Kenya’s National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI; Reference #NACOSTI/P/25/415028), the Institutional Review Board of the Indiana University School of Medicine (Protocol #23171), with reliance agreements executed with Purdue University and Boston University. Dissemination of findings will occur through multiple channels within the research and clinical community, including peer-reviewed journal publications and conference abstracts and presentations. As part of capacity building efforts, the research team will also communicate study results to policy makers, the lay public and other health systems involved in the care of young children with disabilities via study-hosted workshops and conferences.
Patient falls in hospitals lead to patient harm, staff distress and economic burden on health systems. There are few strategies with robust evidence demonstrating benefit for the prevention of falls, especially in acute hospital settings. Education and multicomponent fall prevention approaches are promising. Rigorous systematic measurement of implementation has been lacking in most hospital fall prevention trials. This paper describes the protocol for a trial that will evaluate the impact of supported implementation of tailored multicomponent fall prevention interventions on patient falls in hospital.
A stepped-wedge hybrid type I effectiveness implementation cluster randomised trial will be conducted. Twelve inpatient wards across four metropolitan hospitals will be enrolled in the trial, clustered into groups of four and randomised to commence the intervention at one of three time periods. Patients and ward staff will be recruited to complete pre-implementation surveys, which, combined with analysis of routinely collected local falls data and staff brainstorming, will inform tailored multicomponent fall prevention interventions for each ward. Wards will receive quality improvement training, clinical facilitation and staff education for at least 4 months to support implementation of their fall prevention interventions. The primary outcome—rate of falls—will be measured using routinely collected hospital falls data from the incident management system and medical records. Pre-implementation and post-implementation patient and staff surveys, qualitative interviews and bedside audits will measure secondary effectiveness and implementation outcomes. Healthcare utilisation from hospital data will inform the cost-effectiveness analysis.
The Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (RPAH Zone) approved this trial (protocol number X24-0087 and 2024/ETH00583). The trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000896572). Data collection commenced in October 2024, due for completion in May 2026. Results will be published in reputable international journals and presented at relevant conferences.
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000896572).
Malnutrition is a highly prevalent chronic condition that contributes to higher morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple comorbidities. While positive effects of nutritional therapy in the in-hospital setting have recently been demonstrated, the benefits of long-term nutritional therapy after hospital discharge remain uncertain. Herein, we outline the design and rationale of the EFFORTII trial, the largest nutritional trial to date to assess the effects of continued nutritional support after hospital discharge in medical patients, with particular attention to key design decisions regarding nutritional strategy, patient selection criteria and study endpoints.
The Effect of Continued Nutritional Support at Hospital Discharge on Mortality, Frailty, Functional Outcomes and Recovery (EFFORTII) is an investigator-initiated, non-commercial randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate whether ongoing, individualised nutritional therapy after hospital discharge—targeted to meet specific energy and protein requirements—offers a cost-effective approach to lowering mortality, minimising complications and maintaining functional status compared with standard care. Eligible participants are adult, chronically ill medical inpatients at risk of malnutrition. Patients in the intervention group receive individualised nutritional therapy delivered by an experienced dietitian through a combination of telemedicine and in-person consultations. The intervention aims to meet personalised nutritional targets, supported by a trained dietitian. Control group patients receive nutritional counselling at discharge, but no structured nutritional management during follow-up. We designed the trial as an event-driven trial with a target of 247 mortality events (primary endpoint), which will be assessed over approximately 5 years until event-driven endpoint is met. The minimum total sample size is at least 802 participants, based on the assumed treatment HR of 0.70. The main trial is enrolling patients across multiple sites in Switzerland. During the trial, additional sites in Spain joined the study, and their data will be analysed using a patient-level pooled approach.
This study involves human participants and was first granted ethical approval by the Ethics Committee Northwest- and Central Switzerland and then by all participating local ethics committees. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.
Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) is a highly prevalent immune-mediated condition associated with substantial symptom burden, impaired quality of life and increased healthcare use. Emerging evidence highlights the role of the gut microbiome in immune regulation and allergic disease. Fermented foods may contain live microbes (when unpasteurised or uncooked) and bioactive postbiotic metabolites that can modulate immune responses. Despite growing interest in dietary strategies targeting the microbiome, no randomised controlled trial has compared fermented versus unfermented red cabbage for ARC.
This single-centre, randomised, controlled trial with a sensory-matched, unfermented cabbage comparator investigates the effects of daily consumption of fermented red cabbage for 8 weeks compared with an unfermented red cabbage control in young adults (18–35 years) with ARC. A total of 158 participants will be randomly assigned (1:1). The primary outcome is change in Total Nose and Eye Symptom Score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes include daily symptoms and medication use captured via mobile ecological momentary assessments, quality of life, psychological well-being, gastrointestinal symptoms, systemic inflammatory markers, total IgE, immune cell profile and metagenomic characterisation of stool samples. A nested qualitative component explores participants’ experiences and acceptability of the intervention. Analyses will include mixed-effects models, time-series analyses incorporating daily pollen counts and comprehensive microbiome statistics. Safety outcomes and adverse events will also be assessed.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA4/043/25) and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and a lay summary provided to participants. Anonymised datasets and analysis scripts will be made available in public repositories, and metagenomic sequencing data will be deposited in an international sequence archive to ensure transparency and reproducibility.
DRKS00036475.
The ‘strike early and strike strong’ lipid-lowering strategy emphasises rapid reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are increasingly used alongside statins to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C targets after ACS. However, despite substantial LDL-C reductions with early PCSK9i initiation, their effects on non-culprit coronary atherosclerotic plaques remain unclear. This study aims to assess the impact of early intensive LDL-C lowering with PCSK9i added to moderate-intensity statin therapy on optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived plaque characteristics in non-culprit coronary lesions in patients with ACS.
In this prospective, multicentre, open-label trial, 212 patients with ACS will be randomised 1:1 to an early intensified lipid-lowering strategy (PCSK9i added to moderate-intensity statin) or guideline-directed medical therapy for 6 months. Serial OCT imaging of non-culprit coronary arteries with 20–70% stenosis will be performed at baseline and 6 months. The primary endpoint is the absolute change in minimum fibrous cap thickness within a matched target arterial segment from baseline to 6 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in minimum lumen area, maximum lipid arc, presence of macrophage infiltration, LDL-C reduction and achievement of LDL-C targets. The primary endpoint will be analysed using analysis of covariance, adjusting for treatment group, baseline LDL-C stratification (≥1.8 vs
Ethics approval was granted by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2024 Review No 1943). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at academic conferences.
To explore the direct relationship between financial stress and mental health and wellbeing of nursing students and characterise the effectiveness of available support mechanisms.
Systematic integrative review.
Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, Education Research Complete, MEDLINE, ProQuest Central, PsycNET, Scopus and Web of Science were searched in January and October 2024.
Studies reporting a direct relationship between financial stress and mental health and wellbeing in nursing students were included. Data related to sources of financial stress, mental health impacts, and support mechanisms were extracted, synthesised narratively, and reported thematically.
Findings from nine studies reveal that financial stress significantly affects nursing students' mental health and wellbeing, contributing to emotional distress and reduced quality of life. Financial stress arises from personal, academic and clinical sources, with the intensity varying based on individual demographic profiles and fluctuating throughout their educational journeys. Marginalised and underserved groups experience greater impacts due to pre-existing disadvantages. Current support mechanisms are largely reactive, providing only short-term relief and failing to address root causes. Additionally, students' efforts to alleviate financial stress in one domain often exacerbated it in another.
This review highlights the multifaceted and compounding effects of financial stress on nursing students' mental health and wellbeing. Proactive strategies, including structured employment programs, embedded financial literacy education, and transparent pre-enrolment information offer promising solutions.
While financial stress cannot be fully eradicated, targeted support for at-risk students can mitigate its impacts, improving their mental health and educational outcomes.
This review addresses the critical issue of financial stress among nursing students, highlighting its disproportionate impact on marginalised and underserved groups. It underscores the need for proactive interventions and systemic reform to improve educational experiences globally.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Statement.
No patient or public contribution.
Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024514262
To examine how family caregivers of deceased nursing home residents scored and justified their ratings for each item on the Quality of Dying in Long-Term Care scale and to identify the consistencies and discrepancies between their perceptions and the scores assigned when assessing the residents' end-of-life experience.
A convergent mixed-methods design, comprising a cross-sectional study and a thematic analysis for quantitative and qualitative phases, respectively.
Quantitative and qualitative data were collected simultaneously between May 2018 and February 2019. The two sets of data were analysed separately. For the quantitative component, family caregivers completed the quality of dying in long-term care scale and a single-item question assessing the final month of the residents' life. Descriptive statistics, Mann–Whitney U-tests for comparative analyses and Spearman's correlations were applied to the quantitative data, while deductive thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews.
Sixty-nine family caregivers completed the QoD-LTC, and 11 participated in qualitative interviews. The mean overall QoD-LTC score was 39.29 (SD = 7.58). The highest-rated domain was ‘Personhood’ (M = 4.32; SD = 0.68), while the lowest was ‘Preparatory Tasks’ (M = 2.66; SD = 1.26). Interviewed family caregivers reported effective management of pain and other symptoms, satisfaction with the care provided and respectful and appropriate treatment. However, they identified significant shortcomings in communication concerning end-of-life issues, coping with death and advance care planning. Residents with cognitive impairment had significantly lower scores on the ‘closure’ (p < 0.01) and ‘preparatory tasks’ (p = 0.03) domains as well as on the overall QoD-LTC score (p = 0.01).
The findings demonstrate consistency between the quantitative and qualitative data, with high scores reported across most domains of the QoD-LTC scale, with the exception of the ‘Preparatory Tasks’ domain. Cognitive impairment among residents was associated with lower perceived quality of the dying process from the perspective of family members.
Aspects related to closure and preparatory tasks were often overlooked. Strategies to enhance end-of-life communication and advance care planning are needed.
The study adhered to the EQUATOR guidelines. The Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences (MMR-RHS) checklist for mixed-methods studies, the STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies, and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines for qualitative studies were used for reporting.
No funding was received for the completion of this study.
To explore why and how staff use alarms for falls prevention in hospital and their alignment to person-centred practice.
Qualitative interpretive design.
One hundred focus groups and 25 interviews across 10 health services were completed between October 2022 and September 2024. Participants included nurses (n = 451), allied health (n = 82), and fall prevention managers (n = 18). The Framework Method guided initial data familiarisation and analysis and led to the Person-Centred Practice Framework being identified as a useful framework.
Themes generated: (1) Understaffed, under-resourced, under pressure, (2) Alarm impact on stress and workload, (3) Negotiating patient safety and patient preference, (4) Engaging family as a resource, (5) Sharing responsibility for alarms and falls prevention, and (6) Navigating ambiguity and fearing consequences.
Staff feel compelled to use alarms despite problems associated with their use and challenges to person-centred practice. Drivers of alarm use were feeling under-resourced and fearing liability if patients fell. Staff want clearer organisational guidance in alarm use but also want the freedom to use their own clinical reasoning.
Hospitals worldwide are working to identify effective strategies for preventing falls. However, research has yet to adequately explore the perspectives of frontline nurses and allied health staff regarding the use of mobilisation alarms—a critical gap when evaluating their impact and effectiveness. This study's six key themes provide insights into why alarms are so widely used despite the limited evidence supporting their effectiveness.
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621000823875.
To explore multidisciplinary clinical, academic, policy and governance stakeholders' perceptions of enablers and barriers to implementing designated registered nurse prescribing in Australia, using a systems-thinking approach.
A two-phase explorative study using a systems-thinking lens to investigate complex health-system interdependencies.
Fifty-three participants were recruited from all Australian states and territories, including registered nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, medical practitioners and health-service planners. Phase 1 involved interviews and focus groups conducted between February 2024 and April 2024 (n = 45), analysed using deductive content analysis, guided by the Sustainability of Innovation Framework. Phase 2 was a face-to-face workshop conducted in August 2024 (n = 28), with data from participant discussions and observer field notes analysed inductively and refined through reflexive dialogue. Reflexive analysis of the findings allowed the construction of recommendations for implementation in various healthcare contexts.
In Phase 1, participants representing all Australian jurisdictions and healthcare contexts identified that successful adoption of designated registered nurse prescribing is contingent upon several interrelated system components. These interconnected factors influence each other within the broader healthcare system and serve as the focus for Phase 2.
In Phase 2, participants reported context-specific service models, stakeholder engagement, financial support, clear messaging and workforce/organisational readiness for new models of care and service delivery were recognised as dynamic interrelated elements. Three overarching themes for successful implementation were generated: The Standard—just one piece of the puzzle. Harnessing collective capability. Shared wisdom for success.
National implementation of registered nurse prescribing requires consistent but context-responsive reforms. A systems-thinking approach underscores the need for whole-of-system strategies, acknowledging interdependencies and avoiding rapid, unplanned implementation. This study highlights that sustainable adoption of registered nurse prescribing in Australia depends on recognising system interdependencies and their dynamic nature.
Designated registered nurse prescribing has the potential to improve timely access to medicines and enhance patient-centred care when implemented with whole-of-system support.
This study provides key systems-level recommendations to guide policymakers and healthcare services to successfully implement designated registered nurse prescribing across various settings.
This study highlights key stakeholders' perspectives, providing valuable insights on the essential elements required for the successful adoption of this expanded practice.
Broad systems-level recommendations are offered to guide policymakers and healthcare services to successfully implement designated prescribing across various settings, taking into account the complexity of the healthcare system.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Not registered.
The ‘Wound Hygiene Italia’ project was designed to provide expert-driven recommendations for the assessment, management and monitoring of venous leg ulcers, tailored to diverse settings of care (hospital, ambulatory and home care). The recommendations, developed by a multidisciplinary panel, emphasise the implementation of the Wound Hygiene strategy, a systematic approach targeting biofilm as a primary barrier to wound healing. Wound management is structured around four steps: cleansing, debridement, edge refashioning and dressing selection adapted to the wound bed characteristics, care setting and clinical capabilities, embedded in a holistic approach through comprehensive patient assessment and monitoring of overall well-being. The findings highlight the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration, standardised tools and continuous patient monitoring, as assessed by objective metrics, such as wound size measurements and photographic documentation. Effective communication with patients and caregivers is also essential to ensure treatment adherence and foster trust in the care process. This framework integrates evidence-based practices to optimise outcomes and patient quality of life. By addressing both clinical and psychosocial factors, the recommendations promote a holistic, patient-centred approach that underscores the importance of education, structured follow-ups and tailored interventions.
To identify and prioritise research uncertainties regarding the assessment, management and rehabilitation of patients with problematic hip replacements through a national Priority Setting Partnership (PSP).
A national PSP using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) methodology.
UK.
Patients, carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the care of patients with problematic hip replacements.
A steering group was established. The James Lind Alliance methodology was followed throughout. A nationwide survey was conducted to collect unanswered questions. These were refined, prioritised through an interim survey and ranked at a final consensus workshop.
The initial survey yielded 201 questions, refined to 32. The interim survey had 191 respondents, leading to 19 questions at the final workshop. The top 10 research priorities were agreed on.
This PSP identified key research priorities for problematic hip replacements, focusing on diagnosis, pain management, perioperative optimisation and infection. These priorities can inform researchers and funders to improve outcomes for affected patients.
To examine which information sources medical specialists use to answer clinical questions in daily practice and to describe the relative frequency of use for each source.
Systematic review with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis.
Academic Search Premier, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Emcare, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and PubMed were searched for relevant studies published from 2000 to 1 June 2025.
We included peer-reviewed English-language studies reporting on the frequency of information source usage by medical specialists when addressing clinical questions. Studies reporting usage on a continuous (0–100%) scale were eligible for meta-analysis.
Two reviewers independently screened studies. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment tool with Diverse Studies tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted for studies that were not eligible for quantitative pooling to summarise patterns in information-seeking behaviour and reported barriers. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting continuous usage percentages and assessing at least four information sources. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using a leave-one-out approach. Potential publication bias was explored descriptively using funnel plots.
25 studies were included, of which 6 (with 8641 participants) were eligible for meta-analysis. The narrative synthesis of non-pooled studies showed a consistent reliance on standalone information sources and identified barriers to the use of aggregated sources. In the meta-analysis, digital databases such as PubMed were the most frequently used information source (74%, 95% CI 63% to 85%), followed by textbooks (71%, 95% CI 57% to 85%) and consultation with colleagues (43%, 95% CI 15% to 71%). Systematically aggregated sources, including clinical practice guidelines (38%, 95% CI 27% to 49%) and point-of-care websites (49%, 95% CI 17% to 81%), were used less frequently. Sensitivity analyses indicated that pooled estimates were generally robust, although results should be interpreted cautiously given methodological variability across studies.
Medical specialists predominantly rely on standalone information sources when addressing clinical questions, while systematically aggregated and interpreted sources such as clinical practice guidelines and point-of-care tools are used less frequently. These findings highlight the need to better understand and address barriers to the use of aggregated information sources in clinical practice.
CRD42022267431.
FreshRSS