Conectar
Although multicomponent exercise is a popular nonpharmacological treatment, its effects on cognition vary across studies because of the diversities in exercise combinations. Identifying the most effective combination is of great importance to the prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment.
To compare and rank the efficacy of various multicomponent exercise interventions on cognition in people with cognitive impairment.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, SPORTDiscus and PsycInfo databases up to April 2025 for eligible randomised controlled trials about multicomponent exercise interventions in people with cognitive impairment. Primary outcome was global cognition, with secondary outcomes being executive function and memory. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.
Twenty-five trials involving 2298 participants were included. Pairwise meta-analyses showed multicomponent exercise interventions were effective on global cognition (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30, 0.89; p < 0.001) and executive function (SMD = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.45; p < 0.001). Network meta-analyses revealed that aerobic exercise (AE) + balance & flexibility (BF) training had the highest probability (70.8%) of being the optimal exercise combination for global cognition (SMD = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.23, 1.90; p = 0.016), and AE + resistance exercise (RE) had the highest probability (43.1%) of being the optimal exercise combination for executive function (SMD = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.10; p = 0.042). We did not observe significant effects of multicomponent exercise on memory.
AE + BF training is likely the most effective multicomponent exercise combination for global cognition, while AE + RE showed the optimal effect on executive function in people with cognitive impairment.
Our study contributes to guiding clinical professionals to design and conduct targeted multicomponent exercise interventions as per individual cognitive impairment characteristics to protect individual cognition.
No patient or public contribution applies to this work.
The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023489517).
In recent years, the critical role of health literacy in diabetes management has become increasingly prominent. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of social support on health literacy among patients with diabetes, to test the mediating role of self-efficacy and empowerment between social support and health literacy, and the moderating role of eHealth literacy.
A cross-sectional study conducted between August 2023 and June 2024.
This study adopted the cluster sampling method and conducted a questionnaire survey among 251 patients with diabetes in a tertiary hospital in Wuhu City, Anhui Province. The questionnaires included the Social Support Rating Scale, the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes scale, the Health Empowerment Scale, the eHealth Literacy Scale and the Diabetes Health Literacy Scale.
Social support was positively associated with health literacy in patients with diabetes. Self-efficacy and empowerment mediated the relationship and formed chained mediation pathways respectively. eHealth literacy has a moderating role between self-efficacy and empowerment.
The results revealed that social support influences health literacy among patients with diabetes through the mediating pathways of self-efficacy and empowerment, and that this process is moderated by eHealth literacy. These findings provide a theoretical basis and practical insights for improving health literacy among patients with diabetes.
Enhancing health literacy among people with diabetes by strengthening social support, self-efficacy and empowerment levels, while focusing on the technology-enabling role of eHealth literacy in this context.
This study adheres to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines based on the STROBE cross-sectional reporting method.
We thank all patients who participated in the study for their understanding and support.
This study aims to examine the chain-mediating effects of affective reactions and burnout on the relationship between workplace violence and work performance among nurses while distinguishing between physical and psychological violence.
A longitudinal study was conducted between October 2020 and October 2022. The study took place in four tertiary hospitals of Shandong Province, China. A total of 1086 nurses were recruited.
Workplace psychological violence, workplace physical violence, work performance, affective reactions (including anxiety and depressive symptoms) and burnout were assessed using self-report questionnaires. Data were analysed using multiple linear regressions and structural equation modelling on SPSS and AMOS.
The STROBE checklist was used for this study.
Workplace psychological violence, but not physical violence, was associated with nurses' work performance. Burnout mediates the relationship between workplace psychological violence and work performance. Affective reactions and burnout play serial intermediary roles in the relationship between workplace psychological violence and work performance.
Interventions aimed at reducing anxiety, depressive symptoms, and burnout among nurses who have experienced psychological violence may enhance their work performance.
Hospital administrators should prioritise the development of strategies to prevent psychological violence (e.g., anti-bullying training and counselling support) and enhance nurse performance through burnout screening and targeted interventions.
This study was conducted in Shandong Province, China, and relied on self-reported data, which may be subject to social desirability bias.
No patient or public contribution.
Identifying the core information needs of breast cancer radiotherapy patients serves as the foundation for delivering targeted information services. The Kano model, a qualitative tool for classifying service needs, is increasingly being employed to prioritise patient needs and enhance healthcare quality.
This study aims to examine the informational needs of breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy using the Kano model as the analytical framework.
Between October 2024 and February 2025, 260 patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy were recruited as study participants. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Information Needs Questionnaire. Kano analysis was applied to identify and assess the information needs of these patients. This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.
Among the 36 items analysed, 15 items (41.7%) were classified as one-dimensional attributes, primarily related to adverse reaction identification and self-management information. 11 items (30.5%) were identified as attractive attributes, mainly concerning the impact of radiation therapy and social–emotional needs five items (13.9%) were must-be attributes, focusing on basic radiotherapy information. Five items (13.9%) were indifference attributes, including the impact of radiotherapy on breast reconstruction, and guidance on image-related concerns during radiotherapy. The quadrant chart findings revealed that 15 needs were predominant in Area I, five in Improving Area II, five in Secondary Improving Area III and 11 in Reserving Area IV.
The information needs of breast cancer radiotherapy patients are diverse. Kano model analysis aids medical staff in developing health guidance and meeting patients' informational needs.
Understanding the differentiated informational needs of patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy provides valuable insights for developing targeted educational interventions, ultimately improving patient engagement and outcomes.
The contributions of patients/members of the public were limited solely to data collection.
The efficacy of radiotherapy and the satisfaction of patients can be significantly improved by adequately addressing their information needs. This process is impeded by the current lack of a comprehensive tool for assessing these needs.
To develop an Information Needs Questionnaire for patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy and to assess its reliability and validity.
The initial item pool for the questionnaire was developed through a literature analysis and semi-structured interviews with 12 patients with breast cancer receiving radiotherapy. The Delphi method was employed to consult 16 experts and the questionnaire content was refined based on expert feedback and item ratings to form the first draft. A pre-investigation was conducted on 30 patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy to refine the item expression. From March–October 2024, item analysis, factor analyses, and reliability tests were conducted on 220 patients. This study adhered to STROBE guidelines.
The final questionnaire comprised 36 items. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 5 dimensions, with all item factor loading within their respective dimensions being ≥ 0.4 and no items exhibiting multiple loadings. These five factors accounted for 72.805% of the total variance. The overall content validity index was 0.980, with item-level content validity index ranging from 0.900 to 1.000. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the entire questionnaire was 0.959, and the coefficients for each dimension ranged from 0.786 to 0.958.
The Information Needs Questionnaire demonstrated excellent reliability and validity in patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. It can effectively guide medical staff to accurately assess the information needs of patients with breast cancer who are undergoing radiotherapy.
Identifying the authentic informational needs of breast cancer patients throughout the entire radiotherapy process is instrumental in enabling medical staff to devise personalised and targeted information support interventions.
A total of 220 participants provided perspectives on their information needs.
To systematically search, evaluate and synthesise the most robust evidence regarding pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients admitted to general wards.
The present study provides an evidence-based summary of the most robust findings, adhering to the evidence guidelines established by the Center for Evidence-Based Nursing of Fudan University.
According to the “6S” model, a systematic search was conducted for literature on pressure injury prevention among orthopaedic patients in general wards. The types of literature included guidelines, clinical decisions, expert Consensus, evidence summaries, etc. The search period covered the time from the beginning of the database up to December 2023.
The following databases and resources were systematically searched: Up To Date, JBI, NICE, WOCN, NZWCS, etc.
Fifteen literature sources were included, comprising one clinical decision, eight guidelines, one systematic review, and one expert Consensus. In these sources, a comprehensive collection of 34 pieces of best evidence was formed across six key topics: risk assessment, position management, skin care, device used for device-related pressure injury, nutritional assessment, and support, as well as health education and training. Among the evidence gathered, a strong recommendation was made for 18 pieces, while the remaining 16 received a weak recommendation.
This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the most robust evidence on pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients, encompassing 34 pieces of evidence that can serve as valuable references for clinical practice. Before implementing this evidence, it is crucial to evaluate the specific contextual factors within different countries and medical institutions, as well as the facilitators and barriers influencing its application by healthcare professionals and patient's preferences. Furthermore, targeted evidence selection should be conducted through careful screening and subsequent adjustments in implementation, thereby offering a more scientifically grounded basis for clinical nursing practice. Future research endeavours should prioritise investigating strategies for effective evidence utilisation.
The prevention of pressure injuries poses a significant challenge for orthopaedic patients. This study presents a synthesis of 34 pieces of best evidence to provide guidance on preventive measures for pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients. Adhering to and implementing these 34 pieces of evidence can effectively aid in preventing pressure injuries in clinical practice. This evidence encompasses risk assessment, position management, skin care, device usage for device-related pressure injuries, nutritional support and evaluation, and health education and training, establishing a comprehensive and systematic implementation process. Assessing the risk of pressure injuries during interventions serves as an essential prerequisite for developing effective strategies to prevent such injuries among orthopaedic patients. Ultimately, this study will offer valuable guidance to healthcare professionals worldwide regarding preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients.
Upon admission to the hospital, it is essential to conduct a risk assessment and implement evidence-based, individualised prevention measures for pressure ulcers in patients to prevent their occurrence. This study will provide valuable insights into preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients admitted to orthopaedic wards for healthcare workers worldwide.
The PRIMA manifest is utilised during the text preparation process.
Trail Registration: ES20245365
To provide a viable tool for the early clinical identification of high-risk populations in patients with sepsis.
Sepsis-associated delirium (SAD) has the potential to significantly impact the short- and long-term prognosis of patients. However, accurately predicting and effectively managing SAD remains a significant challenge.
This study employed a retrospective analysis of adult sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first time. Patients were divided into two groups based on their initial Braden score upon admission to the ICU: a high-risk group (≤ 15 points) and a low-risk group (> 15 points). The relationship between Braden score and delirium was assessed using logistic regression and restricted cubic splines, while restricted mean survival time was employed to analyse the relationship between Braden scores and patients' 90- and 180-day mortality.
Of the 28,312 patients included in the study, those in the high-risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of delirium (44.8% vs. 29.7%) and higher 90-day (28.7% vs. 19.4%) and 180-day (33.2% vs. 24.1%) mortality rates (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, logistic regression demonstrated that the risk of delirium was 1.54 times higher in the high-risk group (95% CI = 1.45–1.64, p < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, the difference in survival was statistically significant at both time points, with the high-risk group having a reduced survival rate of 7.50 days (95% CI = −8.24, −6.75; p < 0.001) and 15.74 days (95% CI = −17.40, −14.08; p < 0.001) at 90 days and 180 days, respectively.
The Braden score is a simple and effective tool for the early identification of patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes in sepsis.
Retrospective study.
The Braden score can be employed by clinical nurses for the purpose of early identification of poor prognostic risk in patients with sepsis.
This study was conducted according to the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
Patients were involved in the sample of the study.
To investigate whether a low Braden Skin Score (BSS), reflecting an increased risk of pressure injury, could predict the risk of delirium in older patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Delirium, a common acute encephalopathy syndrome in older ICU patients, is associated with prolonged hospital stay, long-term cognitive impairment and increased mortality. However, few studies have explored the relationship between BSS and delirium.
Multicenter cohort study.
The study included 24,123 older adults from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database and 1090 older adults from the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD), all of whom had a record of BSS on admission to the ICU. We used structured query language to extract relevant data from the electronic health records. Delirium, the primary outcome, was primarily diagnosed by the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Logistic regression models were used to validate the association between BSS and outcome. A STROBE checklist was the reporting guide for this study.
The median age within the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases was approximately 77 and 75 years, respectively, with 11,195 (46.4%) and 524 (48.1%) being female. The median BSS at enrollment in both databases was 15 (interquartile range: 13, 17). Multivariate logistic regression showed a negative association between BSS on ICU admission and the prevalence of delirium. Similar patterns were found in the eICU-CRD database.
This study found a significant negative relationship between ICU admission BSS and the prevalence of delirium in older patients.
The BSS, which is simple and accessible, may reflect the health and frailty of older patients. It is recommended that BSS assessment be included as an essential component of delirium management strategies for older patients in the ICU.
This is a retrospective cohort study, and no patients or the public were involved in the design and conduct of the study.
FreshRSS 