Conectar
To present the process of establishing a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) policy analysis project option at one nursing school, offering examples of diverse student and graduate analyses to guide other institutions.
Nurses are skilled patient advocates, and their advocacy forms a crucial foundation for influencing health policy. This, in turn, enhances population health and addresses health disparities, particularly for vulnerable groups. DNP students are educated to use innovative methods to integrate current evidence to inform practice and policy, yet some nursing schools lack resources to support comprehensive DNP policy analysis projects.
The article presents a case example of how one institution developed a pathway and instructional support to formally offer DNP students the option to perform a DNP policy analysis project.
Essential elements to support students' successful completion of a DNP policy analysis project include adequate faculty expertise in health policy and a structured institutional framework. Residency activities must deepen a student's understanding and knowledge about policy and the health problem trying to be solved with policy. Clear documentation of these unique residency activities is crucial. There is a strong emphasis on the need for clear communication and guidance between programme faculty, programme mentors and students. DNP policy analysis projects enrich students' knowledge, skills and networks, fostering future policy leaders and facilitating collaboration with clinical experts across diverse research fields.
Nurturing DNP students completing policy analysis projects is vital for translating evidence into practice, developing future nurse policy leaders and ensuring health equity and access to quality healthcare.
DNP policy projects can positively influence nursing practice and policy. Expanding upon previous DNP students' policy analysis projects also provides a unique opportunity to build and broaden nursing's impact on policy development.
To explore the views of healthcare practitioners in Britain regarding the role of midwives and nurses in the delivery of medical and surgical abortion.
An observational study of the Shaping Abortion for Change study healthcare practitioner survey (2021–2022).
Relationships between healthcare practitioner type, participant characteristics, knowledge of and attitudes towards abortion, and views about nurses' and midwives' role in abortion care were examined using Pearson's Chi-squared tests of association and multivariable logistic regression.
Amongst 763 participants including doctors, nurses, midwives and pharmacists, 71.6% supported specialist nurses in sexual and reproductive health and abortion clinics and hospitals, expanding their roles to include prescribing abortion medications and surgical abortion methods. Support was lower for midwives (35.8%) and primary care nurses (32.5%). There was considerable support for all nursing and midwifery groups to be involved in adjacent tasks of abortion care. Differences in support by healthcare practitioner type persisted after adjustment for exposure variables.
There is strong support for specialist nurses to expand their role in abortion care. This change could be implemented following clarification of the legal position. Some healthcare practitioner groups are more reluctant to support broader involvement of nurses and midwives in abortion provision.
Expanding specialist nurses' role in abortion care could increase service capacity and improve patient access and experience. Understanding and addressing the concerns of healthcare practitioners opposing this change is critical for successful implementation and patient safety.
This study addresses the potential for nurse and midwife role expansion in abortion care. The findings highlight broad support for specialist nurses whilst identifying barriers to wider role expansion. The research informs policy discussions on workforce optimisation and access to abortion services across Britain.
This study adheres to the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.
In the SACHA study, patient and public involvement was included at all stages to inform study design, recruitment, data collection and analysis.
To synthesise evidence on wearable devices for continuous vital signs monitoring in adult hospital inpatients, focusing on clinical effectiveness, nursing perspectives, workflow impact, patient experience and resource implications.
Scoping review.
Joanna Briggs Institute methodology reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Six databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane), Scite.ai, and hand searching for studies published between January 2015 and November 2025. Data were synthesised using reflexive thematic analysis.
Sixty-seven studies from 19 countries were included. Four integrative themes were identified. (1) Enhancing clinical safety through continuous monitoring: wearable devices consistently enable earlier recognition of physiological deterioration; however, downstream outcomes such as length of stay and transfers to intensive care units were mixed and context dependent. (2) Transforming nursing practice and workflow integration highlighted improved situational awareness and potential efficiency gains, alongside challenges related to alarm overload, parallel documentation and implementation workload. (3) Patient experience of wearable monitoring: most patients reported reassurance and perceived safety, though experiences reflected a tension between monitoring as care and monitoring as surveillance; discomfort, anxiety, and privacy considerations were infrequently examined. (4) Economic and organisational consequences: potential system value was suggested through workforce efficiencies, but economic benefits were largely inferred, with infrastructure and training costs often underreported.
Wearable continuous monitoring technologies show clear potential to support nursing observations enabling improved early detection of deterioration. Realising these benefits depends on effective integration into workflows, robust governance, and sustained nursing leadership rather than technological capability alone. Significant evidence gaps remain regarding long-term outcomes, economic evaluation, and large-scale implementation.
Wearable devices for continuous vital signs monitoring have the potential to transform inpatient surveillance by enabling earlier recognition of physiological deterioration and enhancing nurses' situational awareness. This scoping review synthesises international evidence demonstrating that, although wearable monitoring can improve patient safety and workflow efficiency, its impact depends on effective integration into nursing practice, governance structures, and organisational preparedness. Continuous monitoring also introduces new challenges including alert fatigue, data interpretation, and workflow redesigns, highlighting the vital role of nursing leadership in digital health implementation. The review also identifies critical evidence gaps, particularly concerning long-term clinical outcomes, patient experience, and cost-effectiveness, providing priorities for future research and policy to promote safe, ethical, and sustainable adoption.
None.
To examine the impact of delays in intensive care unit (ICU) admission on patient outcomes, specifically clinical deterioration and mortality among patients transferred from the emergency department (ED) or general wards following acute deterioration in an Australian public hospital.
This prospective cohort study was conducted over a 12-month period (15 April 2022–14 April 2023) in a 209-bed regional hospital. It included adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) admitted to the ICU from ED or general wards following acute deterioration. Primary outcomes measured were duration of delay in ICU admission, ICU and hospital mortality and changes in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores over time to assess organ dysfunction and progression.
A total of 403 patients were included. Of these, 276 (68.5%) experienced delays in ICU admission, ranging from 25 min to 347.25 h (median: 7.13 h). Delayed ICU admission was associated with increased mortality. Each one-point increase in the highest recorded SOFA score was linked to a 7.5% rise in mortality odds, while each one-point increase in the initial or 24-h SOFA score corresponded to a 6.8% increase.
Delayed ICU admission was significantly associated with increased mortality, particularly in patients with elevated SOFA scores, indicating worsening organ dysfunction and clinical instability.
These findings highlight the urgent need for improved triage systems, early warning protocols and streamlined escalation pathways to expedite ICU transfers for deteriorating patients. Timely intervention is essential to reduce harm and improve outcomes.
This study reinforces the clinical risks of delayed ICU admission and supports timely escalation of care in emergency and ward settings across Australian public hospitals.
Conducted in accordance with STROBE guidelines.
No direct patient or public involvement. The study used routinely collected clinical data to evaluate systemic and clinical outcomes.
To explore and map the landscape of doctoral nursing research across eight countries.
A scoping review.
This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and included doctoral theses in nursing defended between 2020 and 2023 in Austria, Italy, Israel, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and the United Kingdom.
Searches were conducted across 15 national and university repositories (4 national, 11 university) in the eight participating countries.
This review included 431 doctoral nursing theses, the majority of which employed quantitative methodologies and focused on patient populations and healthcare professionals. Key topics included clinical nursing care, quality of care, quality of life, home care, perinatal care and the work environments.
Nursing doctoral research shows progress in healthcare delivery, patient care and education via digital tools, holistic approaches and professional development. Yet gaps persist in mental health, paediatrics and marginalised groups. Limited qualitative/mixed-methods research and weak interdisciplinary collaboration reveal further opportunities.
This review underscores that nursing doctoral research is addressing major healthcare and professional challenges. Nonetheless, the identified gaps emphasise the need for more comprehensive and inclusive research to enhance equity and guide future nursing practices and policies.
This review provides an overview of the scope of doctoral nursing research across eight countries, identifying key trends and research gaps. The findings are expected to inform nursing academia, policymakers, and healthcare professionals by guiding future research priorities, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and promoting equitable, patient-centred care practices.
No direct involvement in data collection; one lay reviewer gave feedback on readability and practice implications, informing minor refinements.
To assess the relationship between paradoxical leadership and nurses' positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence in hospital settings through a strengths mindset as a mediator.
A cross-sectional survey conducted from January to March 2024.
The study included 239 nurses from four hospitals in Port Said, Egypt. To measure the study constructs, three well-established scales were utilised: the Paradoxical Leadership Scale, the Strengths Mindset Scale and the Positive Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale. Structural equation modelling was applied for data analysis.
The analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between nurse managers' paradoxical leadership and nurses' positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence. Additionally, a strengths mindset partially mediated the relationship between paradoxical leadership and nurses' positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence.
The study findings suggest that developing paradoxical leadership behaviours—such as managing current work processes while simultaneously driving the exploration of new initiatives—among nurse managers can foster a strengths mindset in nurses, which in turn promotes a more positive attitude towards the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare.
This study enhances the understanding of how paradoxical leadership influences nurses' acceptance of artificial intelligence, underscoring the pivotal role of a strengths mindset in this process.
This study suggests that healthcare policymakers seeking smoother integration of artificial intelligence technologies among nurses should prioritise leadership development programmes that equip nurse managers with paradoxical leadership skills and implement training initiatives to strengthen nurses' mindsets.
The study was reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
This study was an investigation of the key factors influencing nurse retention and attrition focusing on the perspectives of current and former nurses within the context of the ongoing nursing shortage exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
This descriptive, cross-sectional study was designed to explore the complex dynamics of nurse retention and attrition in a rural and northern academic hospital in northwestern Ontario.
An online survey was administered to current and former nurses to compare the perspectives of those with no intention of leaving the organisation, those contemplating departure within the next year, and those who had reduced their work hours in the past 5 years.
Of the 288 respondents, 47% indicated no intention to leave and 17% reported having already left the organisation. The primary reasons for attrition included excessive workload demands, challenges maintaining a healthy work-life balance and dissatisfaction with management practices and organisational support. Respondents recommended improving leadership effectiveness, increasing staffing levels and implementing retention-focused initiatives to enhance job satisfaction and reduce turnover.
This study underscored the urgent need for strategic interventions tailored to retain nursing staff, particularly in rural and northern communities already facing significant recruitment and retention challenges. By addressing workload pressures, enhancing work-life balance, strengthening leadership and offering retention initiatives, health care organisations can improve job satisfaction and reduce attrition. System-level changes are essential to creating a sustainable and supportive environment for nursing professionals.
The findings highlight the critical need for immediate action to address the nursing crisis in rural and northern health care settings. They emphasise the importance of systemic interventions aimed at improving staffing levels, leadership practices and overall work conditions to safeguard the future of nursing in these underserved regions.
No patient or public contribution.
This research will contribute to the extant literature on the retention and attrition levels of nursing by offering a unique perspective from a rural and northern academ. The findings may help to guide hospital administrators to develop targeted strategies to enhance nurse retention rates within their organisations. By prioritising nurse satisfaction, these efforts will foster positive nurse–patient interactions and improve overall care outcomes.
This study is reported according to STROBE guidelines.
To co-produce a prototype intervention to help nurses improve the assessment and care of the sexual health needs of men with inflammatory bowel disease.
Inflammatory bowel disease can have a significant impact on the sexual health and well-being of men, but has largely been neglected in research and clinical guidelines. Men with the disease report that sexual health is not discussed during consultations, while healthcare practitioners describe a lack of confidence to initiate sexual health assessments. At present, no evidence-based tool exists to support nurses in detecting, assessing, and providing care for the sexual health of men with the disease.
A mixed-methods study shaped by phase 1 of the Medical Research Council's framework for the development of complex interventions.
(1) Cross-sectional surveys of (i) men with inflammatory bowel disease, (ii) nurses, and (iii) inflammatory bowel disease services to determine the current state of sexual health provision across the UK National Health Service. (2) Semi-structured interviews with men and the partners of men with IBD and asynchronous focus groups with health professionals to explore appropriate and acceptable ways to provide sexual healthcare. (3) Three consecutive co-production workshops inclusive of men with the disease, healthcare professionals, and stakeholders to formulate a prototype intervention.
This study will create an evidence-based prototype intervention that will provide nurses with the knowledge and skills required to effectively assess the sexual health needs of men with inflammatory bowel disease and provide appropriate, patient-centred care.
The study design was supported by a patient group. The study delivery will be supported by a patient co-investigator and stakeholder group inclusive of men with lived experience of the disease.
This report adheres to the SPIRIT 2013 checklist for standard protocol items for clinical trials.
clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT06562751
FreshRSS 