In addition to hypertension, the constellation of metabolic abnormalities (diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and/or obesity) independently increases the incidence and severity of cardiovascular diseases, and this is compounded by the modern lifestyle and ageing society. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is high and non-hypertensive heart failure is common in Asians. Adverse cardiac remodelling is an important substrate for cardiac dysfunction in the onset and progression of heart failure and its amelioration improves outcomes and prognosis. A better understanding of metabolic-driven cardiac remodelling is warranted due to the rising prevalence and complexity of metabolic syndrome and strong interests in targeted therapy.
Response of the myocardium to hypertrophic conditions in the adult population is a prospective observational cohort study with an aim to establish the significance of cardiac remodelling by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The current recruitment target is 2000 participants. Expanding from the initial population with hypertension, the study examines adults with cardiometabolic conditions, including diabetes, dyslipidaemia, obesity and fatty liver disease. Eligible patients are identified at National Heart Centre Singapore, primary care clinics and through public outreach. Physical, clinical, imaging and biochemical data are collected. Cardiac remodelling features pertaining to hypertrophy, fibrosis and functional changes are assessed on CMR. Body adiposity is mapped by MRI across the heart, liver and abdomen. Outcome data are adjudicated and follow-up assessment will be available in a subset of participants. Blood biomarkers will be investigated in relation to imaging findings. Cross-sectional analysis will establish the implication of cardiometabolic disease towards cardiac remodelling, while follow-up and outcome analysis will infer on disease progression and prognosis.
The study was approved by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (2015/2603). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants. Study findings will be reported in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02670031.
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NET) are malignant neoplasms that impact survival. Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are used for treating hormonal symptoms caused by GEP NET and have antiproliferative effects. They are used as first-line therapy in patients with advanced GEP NET, but disease control is limited to a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 14–32 months. Second-line treatment options include targeted therapy (everolimus or sunitinib), or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE. In patients suffering from a NET-related hormonal syndrome, SSA is generally continued life-long. However, there is no consensus on whether it is beneficial to continue SSA in non-functional NET upon disease progression. Due to the ongoing activity of the somatostatin receptor pathway in GEP NET progressing on first-line SSA, we hypothesise that SSA have an added efficacy in second-line therapy.
The SAUNA trial is an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, pragmatic clinical trial. 270 patients with advanced, non-functional GEP NET and progression under first-line SSA will be included in substudy 1 (PRRT; n=142) or substudy 2 (targeted therapy (everolimus/sunitinib); n=128) per investigator’s choice of second-line therapy and will be randomised (1:1) per substudy between SSA continuation or SSA withdrawal arms. Co-primary endpoints are the difference in progression-free survival (PFS) according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours) V.1.1 criteria and difference in time to deterioration (TTD) in quality of life (QoL) per substudy after initiating second-line therapy with or without SSA. Secondary endpoints include the PFS rate at 18 months, the difference in pooled PFS and TTD combining both substudies, overall survival, response rates, QoL, costs, cost-effectiveness and toxicity. The study design was developed in cooperation with the Belgium and Dutch patient organisations.
The study has been approved on 31 May 2023 by the Ethical Committees and Regulatory Authorities of the concerned member states (EU CT number 2022-502703-30-00). Both the trial management group and the steering committee will oversee good governance of this trial. Results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and presented at international conferences.
Chronic ulcer patients form a heterogenous group of patients with various medical backgrounds. Cost-effective targeted treatment necessitates more knowledge about specific features related to different subgroups of ulcer patients. Hence, this study aimed to characterize ulcer patients according to gender and ulcer aetiology. A total of 946 consecutively recorded chronic ulcer patients in the Tampere Wound Registry (TWR) were included and data were gathered from the TWR and patient medical records. Comparisons were made between males and females and patients with venous-, arterial or mixed-, diabetic foot-, pressure- and atypical ulcers. Male patients were found to have diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and obesity significantly more often than females (59.2% vs. 39.6%; p < 0.001, 46.5% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.001, 42.7% vs. 35.9%; p = 0.017 respectively), whereas autoimmune diseases were more common among females (30.6% vs. 15.6%; p < 0.001). Recurrence of ulcers was most common among patients with venous ulcers (p < 0.001) and multimorbidity among those with diabetic foot ulcers (p < 0.001). To conclude, males with chronic ulcers would benefit particularly from lifestyle advice, multidisciplinary treatment should be targeted specifically at those with diabetic and arterial or mixed ulcers and preventive measures at those with venous ulcers.
by Fengying Wei, Ruiyang Zhou, Zhen Jin, Yamin Sun, Zhihang Peng, Shaojian Cai, Guangmin Chen, Kuicheng Zheng
The differences of SARS-CoV-2 variants brought the changes of transmission characteristics and clinical manifestations during the prevalence of COVID-19. In order to explore the evolution mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 variants and the impacts of variant evolution, the classic SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered) compartment model was modified to a generalized SVEIR (Susceptible-Vaccinated-Exposed-Infected-Recovered) compartment model with age-group and varying variants in this study. By using of the SVEIR model and least squares method, the optimal fittings against the surveillance data from Fujian Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention were performed for the five epidemics of Fujian Province. The main epidemiological characteristics such as basic reproduction number, effective reproduction number, sensitivity analysis, and cross-variant scenario investigations were extensively investigated during dynamic zero-COVID policy. The study results showed that the infectivities of the variants became fast from wild strain to the Delta variant, further to the Omicron variant. Meanwhile, the cross-variant investigations showed that the average incubation periods were shortened, and that the infection scales quickly enhanced. Further, the risk estimations with the new variants were performed without implements of the non-pharmaceutical interventions, based on the dominant variants XBB.1.9.1 and EG.5. The results of the risk estimations suggested that non-pharmaceutical interventions were necessary on the Chinese mainland for controlling severe infections and deaths, and also that the regular variant monitors were still workable against the aggressive variant evolution and the emergency of new transmission risks in the future.This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) on wound area reduction based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant literature. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of wound area reduction. Secondary outcome measures included wound healing time and the incidence of infection. A total of 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the percentage of wound area reduction was significantly greater in the APCs group compared to conventional treatments (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27–2.68, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the percentage of wound area reduction varied based on wound location, follow-up duration, and type of APCs used. The healing time and incidence of infection presented no significant difference between the two groups. The findings suggest that APCs can effectively reduce wound areas when compared to conventional treatments, without increasing the risk of infection. In addition, the effectiveness of APCs in wound area reduction may vary depending on factors such as wound location, type of APCs used, and follow-up duration.