Conectar
Digital exclusion has been linked to adverse health outcomes among older adults. However, its relationship with health literacy, a midstream determinant of health outcomes in aging populations, remains insufficiently explored.
To investigate the relationship between digital exclusion and health literacy among older adults, and to assess the mediating effects of social support and self-efficacy.
A cross-sectional study.
Data from the 2021 Psychology and Behaviour Investigation of Chinese Residents (PBICR) survey were used. Digital exclusion was assessed through self-reported non-use of computers or smartphones. Health literacy, social support and self-efficacy were measured using the Short-Form Health Literacy Instrument, the 12-item Perceived Social Support Scale and the New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Generalised linear models (GLM) were employed to examine the relationships between digital exclusion and health literacy, while mediation analysis with bootstrapping assessed the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy.
A total of 1147 older adults participated in the study, with 27.64% identified as digitally excluded and a moderate level of health literacy. GLM analysis identified several significant factors influencing health literacy, including digital exclusion, social support, self-efficacy, higher education levels, household monthly income per capita > 3000 RMB, non-agricultural hukou, chronic conditions and medication use. Mediation analysis revealed that digital exclusion negatively impacted health literacy. Social support and self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between digital exclusion and health literacy.
Digital exclusion is negatively associated with health literacy among older adults, with social support and self-efficacy partially mediating the relationship.
This study underscores the importance of addressing digital exclusion, as well as promoting social support and self-efficacy to enhance health literacy in ageing populations.
This study provides insights into the relationship between digital exclusion and health literacy among older adults, as well as the mediating effects of social support and self-efficacy, offering potential targets for health literacy improvement.
STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology).
No patient or public contribution was involved.
To investigate the factors that facilitate or hinder nurses in providing patient education.
A mixed-method systematic review.
Six databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE and ERIC) were systematically searched for relevant publications.
The study was conducted following the JBI for mixed-method systematic reviews, and the reporting followed the PRISMA guideline. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, literature evaluation, data extraction and synthesis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023427451.
Twenty-six eligible articles were included, including 15 quantitative articles, 10 qualitative articles and 2 mixed-methods articles. The resultant synthesis of key findings led to the identification of these barriers and facilitators, categorised into five distinct levels: nurse-related factors, organisational factors, patient-related factors, the nurse–patient relationship and interdisciplinary collaboration.
The findings highlight the factors that facilitate or hinder nurses in providing patient education, suggesting that multifaceted interventions can enhance the practice of patient education in nursing and support the development of appropriate patient education guidelines or public policies.
This review delineates the facilitators and barriers influencing nurses' provision of patient education, offering an initial framework for nursing managers to craft interventions aimed at enhancing the quality of patient education provided by nurses, consequently elevating the overall quality of nursing.
To investigate whether chronic diseases are associated with higher COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and explore factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in patients with chronic diseases.
Vaccine hesitancy has been acknowledged as one of the greatest hazards to public health. However, little information is available about COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among patients with chronic diseases who may be more susceptible to COVID-19 infection, severe disease or death.
From 6 to 9 August 2021, we performed an internet-based cross-sectional survey with 22,954 participants (14.78% participants with chronic diseases). Propensity score matching with 1:1 nearest neighbourhood was used to reduce confounding factors between patients with chronic diseases and the general population. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, the factors impacting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were identified among patients with chronic diseases.
Both before and after propensity score matching, patients with chronic diseases had higher COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy than the general population. In addition, self-reported poor health, multiple chronic diseases, lower sociodemographic backgrounds and lower trust in nurses and doctors were associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among patients with chronic diseases.
Patients with chronic diseases were more hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine. Nurses should focus on patients with chronic diseases with poor health conditions, low socioeconomic backgrounds and low trust in the healthcare system.
Clinical nurses are recommended to not only pay more attention to the health status and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with chronic diseases but also build trust between nurses and patients by improving service levels and professional capabilities in clinical practice.
Patients or the public were not involved in setting the research question, the outcome measures, or the design or implementation of the study. However, all participants were invited to complete the digital informed consent and questionnaires.
This study explores the situation of workload, work–family conflict and job burnout among primary health workers in China in the context of COVID-19 and identifies the mediating effect of work–family conflict between workload and job burnout.
Since the breakout of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary health workers have been working on the frontline of the epidemic and may experience increasing workload, work–family conflict and job burnout. It is important to focus on the issue of how to alleviate job burnout of primary health workers.
A cross-sectional study (STROBE) was used.
Data were collected from 785 primary health workers in China. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the mediating effect of work–family conflict between workload and job burnout.
18.7%, 10.4% and 39.5% of respondents had high job burnout in the dimensions of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment, respectively. 34.6% of the respondents had high or very high workload, and 12.8% of the respondents had high or very high work–family conflict. Results of multiple regression analysis indicated that work–family conflict mediated the relationship between workload and job burnout. Workload (β = .163, CI = .207–.549) and work–family conflict (β = .211, CI = .311–.640) positively influenced job burnout, and workload (β = .428, CI = .375–.508) positively influenced work–family conflict.
The study indicated that primary health workers experienced a high level of job burnout, especially in the personal accomplishment dimension. Furthermore, this study verified the mediating effect of work–family conflict between workload and job burnout.
Some interventions for alleviating workload, work–family conflict and job burnout should be taken, including workplace assistance programmes, family-friendly policies and a well-integrated healthcare system.
This study does not involve patient or public contribution in any part.
Nurses and other primary health workers are health gatekeepers of residents and play a vital role in the healthcare system. Due to the breakout of COVID-19, they have taken more work and are more vulnerable to work overload, work–family conflict and the consequent job burnout. Some interventions should be taken to effectively alleviate their job burnout and improve their health and performance.
FreshRSS 