This study explores and understands community members' resilience in outpatient clinics, considering various dimensions and types of resilience.
A cross-sectional study.
This study was conducted in Saudi outpatient clinics from September to December 2023 and included 384 individuals chosen through systematic random sampling. Various tools were used, such as Social Cohesion and Trust Scale, Community Resilience Assessment Tool, Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, Environmental Resilience Assessment, Economic Resilience Index, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Resilience Scale for Adults and Healthcare Resilience Index.
Participants displayed a robust overall resilience level, as indicated by Total Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale score of 63.0 ± 9.0. Additionally, they demonstrated commendable levels of resilience in Total Brief Resilience Scale (56.04 ± 8.6), Resilience Scale for Adults (82.5 ± 7.2) and Healthcare Resilience Index (45.8 ± 5.5). These findings offer significant insights into psychological and emotional well-being of the study population, highlighting their adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms across various life domains.
This study provides valuable insights into the multidimensional nature of resilience in outpatient settings. The cross-sectional design sets the groundwork for future longitudinal investigations, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to understanding and promoting resilience.
This study holds immediate implications for participants and their communities. It underscores the adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms prevalent in the outpatient population by revealing commendable resilience levels. This insight enhances individuals' psychological and emotional well-being, contributing positively to the overall resilience and communal strength. Additionally, this study sheds light on how resilience among community members in Saudi Arabia relates to international advanced nursing communities, providing insight into their work.
Patients who have received outpatient services in the past 6 months were purposively chosen to ensure a diverse representation across age, gender and socio-economic backgrounds in this study.
Older adults face growing risks of depression and anxiety, yet stigma, comorbidities, cost, and limited access impede receipt of conventional care. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), including immersive virtual reality (VR), exergaming, and mobile apps, may reduce these barriers.
To evaluate the efficacy of DMHIs in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms among adults aged ≥ 50 years.
We conducted a PRISMA adherent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Interventions included immersive VR, exergaming/physical digital platforms, mobile applications, and digital cognitive training. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled with random effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with I 2.
Nineteen RCTs (n = 718; mean ages 50.9–84.7 years) met inclusion criteria. Across studies, DMHIs significantly reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = −0.656, 95% CI = −0.932 to −0.380; p < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (SMD = −0.559, 95% CI = −0.740 to −0.380; p < 0.0001). Immersive and physically engaging modalities (e.g., VR, exergaming) outperformed app-based approaches. Heterogeneity ranged from moderate to high (I 2 ≈ 69.6%–97%).
Offer DMHIs: especially VR or exergaming when access to in-person therapy is limited or as an adjunct to usual care. Provide brief onboarding and, when feasible, caregiver support to boost adherence and confidence with technology. Select or configure age-friendly interfaces (e.g., large fonts, simple navigation) to address common usability barriers. Integrate DMHIs into stepped-care or rehabilitation pathways and monitor outcomes with validated tools (e.g., GDS, STAI). Address equity by supplying devices/connectivity solutions and consider cost-effectiveness and long-term engagement in implementation plans.
Trial Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD420250655153
This study aims to identify the impact of climate change anxiety and asthma control on asthmatics' quality of life and examine the moderating role of climate change anxiety in this linkage.
A multi-national cross-sectional study was conducted in four Arabian countries on 1266 asthmatics selected by convenience sampling. Data were collected from November 2023 to February 2024 using a climate anxiety scale, mini-asthma quality of life questionnaire, and an asthma control questionnaire.
Climate anxiety was higher among middle-aged participants, as well as those with longer disease durations and previous hospitalisations. Climate anxiety showed strong negative correlations with asthma control (r = −0.704, p ≤ 0.05) and asthma quality of life (r = − 0.638, p ≤ 0.05). Climate anxiety and asthma control are powerful predictors of quality of life among asthmatics. Climate anxiety moderates the relationship between asthma control and quality of life, making it less positive (B = −0.094, p > 0.001). Covariates such as gender, age, comorbidities, employment status, disease duration, and previous hospitalisation showed significant associations with asthma quality of life.
Assessment and mitigation of climate anxiety among asthmatics is a key strategy for controlling asthma and improving the quality of life. So, nurses must incorporate climate anxiety assessment into the care plan for asthmatics.
Climate change is a global concern, and insights into how climate-related psychological stressors exacerbate asthma symptoms and overall health outcomes are necessary. The findings provide actionable data for healthcare professionals to underscore the need for integrated healthcare approaches considering environmental and psychological factors.
This study adheres to strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement.
Clients with asthma across multiple nationalities actively contributed to our paper.
To examine whether emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between gender role conflict and turnover intentions among nurses in university medical clinics.
Cross-sectional correlational study using structural equation modelling.
Total-population sampling was used to invite all registered nurses employed at King Faisal University medical clinics (Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia). Participants completed Arabic versions of the Gender Role Conflict Scale, Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale and Turnover Intention Scale-6. Data collection occurred in February 2025. Confirmatory factor analyses supported construct validity. Mediation was tested with bootstrapped indirect effects (5000 samples).
Ninety nurses participated (63.3% women; mean age 27.3 years). Gender role conflict correlated positively with turnover intentions (r = 0.47, p < 0.01) and negatively with emotional intelligence (r = −0.42, p < 0.01). Emotional intelligence correlated negatively with turnover intentions (r = −0.39, p < 0.01). The structural model showed good fit (CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.043, SRMR = 0.039). Gender role conflict had a direct positive association with turnover intentions (β = 0.33, p < 0.01) and an indirect effect via reduced emotional intelligence (indirect estimate = 0.18; 95% CI 0.12–0.26), supporting partial mediation.
Emotional intelligence partially explains how gender role conflict relates to nurses' intentions to leave. Targeted development of emotional competencies, alongside organisational strategies that address gendered role expectations, may help reduce turnover.
Findings identify a modifiable psychological pathway linking gendered stressors and turnover. Embedding emotional intelligence training in education and practice and addressing gender role conflict through inclusive policies may improve retention and quality of care.
STROBE.
None.
Explore and describe the triggers, preventive strategies, and sociocultural dynamics of violence in healthcare settings, focusing on the experiences and perspectives of nurses Damietta Governorate, Egypt.
A cross-sectional design.
A stratified random sampling approach was followed to ensure representation from all departments by recruiting 424 nurses from several hospitals in Egypt. Self-administered questionnaires were applied, using validated instruments such as the Hospital Safety Climate Scale, the Coping Strategies Inventory, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the Perceived Causes of Workplace Violence Questionnaire, and the Workplace Violence Scale to collect data. Data analysis using SPSS version 26 was carried out with descriptive statistics including means and standard deviations. STROBE reporting guidelines were followed.
Nurses had a moderate level of verbal abuse (mean 3.50) and bullying/harassment (mean 3.00) and lesser incidences of physical violence (mean 2.80) and sexual harassment (mean 2.70). The most common cause was perceived as organisational factors (mean 3.80) and then environmental (mean 3.60) and sociocultural (mean 3.40). Problem-focused coping strategies, which were used mostly (mean 3.45), emotional exhaustion (mean 4.20), making the overall burnout level moderate (mean 3.83). The safety climate had positive perceptions concerning management support (mean 3.80), an area needing improvement in safety communication (mean 3.70) and staff training (mean 3.60).
The study underscores the prevalent issues of workplace violence and emotional exhaustion among nurses, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and support systems to address these challenges.
Implementing comprehensive support programs, enhancing safety protocols, and focusing on both problem-focused and emotional support strategies are essential for improving nurse well-being and reducing workplace violence. These measures will contribute to a safer working environment and better patient care outcomes.
What problem did the study address? The study explored and described the high incidence of workplace violence and its impact on nurses' emotional well-being and job satisfaction in Egyptian healthcare settings.
What were the main findings? Prevalent verbal abuse and bullying were noted in the study, with the organisational factors identified as the most important cause. High levels of emotional exhaustion and moderate burnout, coupled with positive but improvable perceptions of safety climate, were reported.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Impacts from the research would touch every nurse working in hospitals around the cities of Damietta Governorate in Egypt, including Damietta General Hospital, Central Hospital in Faraskour, Elzarqa General Hospital, and probably other healthcare settings in the locale. It is anticipated that the results will give way to new hospital policies and practices on improving nurse safety and job satisfaction, which could lead to enhanced overall patient care.
The STROBE checklist was followed.
No patient or public contribution.
Gender equity and workplace bias are critical factors influencing job satisfaction and career progression in healthcare. Despite global initiatives promoting equity, disparities persist within nursing, impacting organizational commitment and workforce retention.
This study investigates registered nurses' perceptions of gender equity and workplace bias and their impact on job satisfaction at King Khaled Hospital, Saudi Arabia.
A cross-sectional quantitative study design was employed, involving 246 randomly selected registered nurses. Data were collected using the gender equity in the Workplace Scale (GEWS), Workplace Gender Bias Scale (WGBS), and Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS). Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analyses were conducted using SPSS to assess gender differences and relationships between perceptions of equity, bias, and job satisfaction.
The study revealed moderate agreement regarding gender equity in promotions (48.8%) and compensation (52%), indicating room for improvement in implementing equality policies. Workplace bias was perceived notably in stereotyping (50.8%) and differential treatment (60%), with female nurses reporting higher levels of bias. Job satisfaction was moderate, with 60% of participants expressing overall satisfaction and only 42% satisfied with promotional opportunities. Perceptions of gender equity positively correlated with job satisfaction (r = 0.65, p < 0.001), while workplace bias was inversely correlated (r = −0.54, p < 0.001).
Persistent gender inequities and workplace biases negatively affect job satisfaction and career progression in nursing. Addressing these disparities through equitable organizational policies, diversity training, and inclusive leadership can enhance job satisfaction, improve retention, and foster a supportive work environment. These findings highlight the need for systemic reforms to promote workplace equity and well-being in healthcare organizations.
The mental health and well-being of nurses are critical issues in health care, particularly following the increased stressors introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurses frequently experience burnout, stress, and emotional exhaustion due to systemic issues such as staffing shortages, heavy workloads, and limited access to mental health resources. These challenges not only affect nurses' well-being but also impact the quality of patient care. Organizational support plays a pivotal role in mitigating these issues, yet the lived experiences of nurses regarding such support remain underexplored.
This Study Aimed to Explore Nurses' Lived Experiences of Organizational Support and Its Impact on Their Mental Health Recovery, With a Focus on Identifying Actionable Strategies for Improvement.
A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to gain deep insights into nurses' experiences. Twenty nurses from various healthcare facilities in the Asir region, Saudi Arabia, were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and themes.
Three main themes emerged: (1) Supportive Leadership, highlighting the critical role of empathetic and communicative leadership in fostering well-being; (2) Systemic Barriers, including staffing shortages, heavy workloads, and limited access to mental health resources; and (3) Workplace Wellness Culture, reflecting the influence of stigma, peer support, and the practicality of wellness programs on mental health recovery. These themes underscore the interconnected nature of leadership, systemic issues, and workplace culture in supporting nurses' mental health.
The findings suggest several actionable strategies, including leadership training programs to foster empathy and communication, policies to address systemic barriers, tailored and accessible wellness programs, and initiatives to reduce mental health stigma. These interventions are essential for creating supportive environments that prioritize nurses' well-being and enhance their ability to deliver high-quality care.