FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerInternacionales

Beyond Borders: Diaspora Nurses' Voices on Retention, Respect and Resilience

ABSTRACT

This paper responds to the recently published article on nurses' turnover intentions and their lived experiences of disempowerment, moral distress and organisational neglect. While the study illuminates important workplace realities, it overlooks the perspectives of nurses who have left not only their institutions but also their countries of origin. From the vantage point of Filipino nurses in the diaspora, the decision to migrate mirrors the dynamic, cumulative processes described in the article. Migration is seldom the result of one critical incident; rather, it arises from entrenched systemic issues—understaffing, lack of respect and persistent undervaluing of nursing contributions—that transcend borders. Diaspora nurses bring with them narratives of resilience, yet their departure reflects health system fragility in their home countries and exposes new challenges in host nations. This commentary highlights the urgent need for global cooperation, stronger leadership and policy innovations that recognise migration as part of the retention equation, not apart from it.

Cross‐Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the MISSCARE Survey–Patient—Danish Version

ABSTRACT

Aim

To translate, cross-culturally adapt, validate and psychometrically test the MISSCARE Survey–Patient for assessing patients' perspectives on missed nursing care (MNC) in a Danish hospital setting.

Design

A two-phase cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation study.

Methods

The study was conducted in two phases. First, the MISSCARE Survey–Patient was cross-culturally adapted to ensure its relevance in a Danish hospital context. This phase involved translation and back-translation, expert committee reviews and cognitive interviews with 18 inpatients to establish content validity. Second, a convenience sample of 284 patients from surgical and medical departments completed the adapted survey. Psychometric properties were evaluated using structural equation modelling to test a second-order formative model.

Results

The cross-cultural adaptation phase led to minor and substantial revisions, including the addition of six new items to enhance content validity. These items addressed aspects of nursing care relevant to patients in the contemporary hospital setting that were not captured by the original survey. Structural equation modelling confirmed the second-order formative model and demonstrated robust psychometric properties.

Conclusion

The MISSCARE Survey–Patient was successfully adapted and validated for use in Danish hospitals, ensuring strong content validity and psychometric robustness.

Implication

The Danish version of the survey provides a valuable tool for assessing MNC from patients' perspectives in hospital settings. Its use can help identify specific areas where nursing care falls short, guiding targeted initiatives to enhance care quality and patient safety. By integrating patients' experiences into quality improvement initiatives, the survey supports the development of more person-centred care practices.

Reporting Method

The study adhered to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures.

Patient Contribution

Patients were not involved in the study's design, conduct, or reporting.

Impact

The Danish version of the survey facilitates data collection on patients' perspectives of MNC in contemporary hospital settings, providing valuable insights into care quality. By offering a validated tool to assess MNC from patients' perspectives, the survey helps hospitals identify care gaps, prioritise improvement efforts and enhance person-centred care.

Exploring Experiences of the New Graduate Registered Nurse in Caring for the Deteriorating Patient in Rural Areas: A Qualitative Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore the experiences of new graduate registered nurses in caring for the deteriorating patient in rural areas.

Background

New graduate registered nurses often feel unprepared to care for the deteriorating patient. Whilst literature has recognised new graduate registered nurses working within metropolitan areas feel ill-equipped to care for deteriorating patients, there is a paucity of literature focused on experiences within the rural context.

Design

Qualitative, descriptive phenomenological approach.

Methods

In-depth interviews were undertaken with 7 participants in rural Eastern Australia with collected data being subject to thematic analysis.

Results

Three themes were identified that shares the lived experiences of the participants as they transitioned into the rural team: First encounters—Transition to the rural team; Practice support for managing deterioration; and The road to confidence.

Conclusion

New graduate registered nurses are unprepared to care for the deteriorating patient in rural areas. Practice support and barriers to ongoing education are influential on their experience with findings from this study supporting focused rural healthcare preparation from tertiary education providers, plus structured practice support from senior rural nurses and health facility orientation programs. Preparation should include the use of digital technologies and escalation and management of the deteriorating patient alongside rural policies and procedures to enhance patient safety and support new graduate rural nurses.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

The findings have implications for tertiary undergraduate nursing education and those supporting New Graduate Registered Nurses in their transition to practice in rural areas. Enhancement of new graduate nurses' skills and abilities in recognition and responding to patient deterioration through both technological and personnel support will enhance patient safety within rural health care.

Reporting Method

Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).

Patient or Public Contribution

7 participants were involved in the study.

Development and Usability Evaluation of a Web‐Based Tool for Evidence Implementation in Healthcare: PACES (Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System)

ABSTRACT

Background

Clinicians face challenges in implementing evidence-based practices due to limited resources and tools that can support their efforts in translating evidence into practice. To address this, JBI developed PACES (Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System), an online tool designed to streamline and support evidence implementation and quality improvement projects.

Objectives

This paper reports the development of JBI-PACES and presents an evaluation of its usability (usefulness, satisfaction, ease of use) and user recommendations for improvements.

Methods

PACES was developed based on the integration of the Donabedian perspective on quality improvement and JBI's process model for evidence implementation, which incorporates context evaluation, facilitation of change, and the evaluation of both process and outcomes. Initially launched in 2004, the system underwent multiple enhancements based on informal user feedback from 2007 to 2017. A significant update, version 0.0.23 Build 1, was re-launched in late 2018. To evaluate its usability, we conducted a cross-sectional study using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), which also gathered qualitative feedback.

Results

PACES supports evidence implementation by allowing users to conduct audits across multiple sites and over time, enabling data comparisons and insights into clinical practices. Findings from the usability evaluation showed high levels of satisfaction with the system's usefulness and ease of use. However, qualitative data indicated areas where further enhancements could optimize user experience and functionality.

Linking Evidence to Practice

The current study suggests clear benefits of PACES in terms of its utility and value for supporting evidence-based practices. Although the system performs well in usability, ongoing refinements are necessary to optimize user experience and ensure the tool continues to meet the evolving needs of healthcare professionals.

The Relationship Between Depression, Burnout, and Suicide Among Healthcare Professionals: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT

Background

Burnout and mental health concerns are prevalent among healthcare workers. Female physicians, nurses, and healthcare staff are at a higher risk of suicide than the general population. Burnout and depression have been known to coexist with suicidal ideation and behaviors.

Aims

To identify what is known about the relationship between burnout and depression in the context of suicide among healthcare workers.

Methods

Registered scoping review of English language articles indexed to CINAHL, PubMed, and PsychInfo databases with date of publication prior to March 5, 2024.

Results

The review yielded nine eligible studies, all employing observational or descriptive methodologies. Depression was found to be a predictor of suicidal ideation. While burnout was associated with depressive symptoms and found to coexist with suicidal ideation, it was not predictive of ideation. Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were key components of burnout linked to depression. No studies were found exploring survivorship factors in healthcare professionals. Suggested prevention strategies that need to be tested include mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral skills training, improved workplace conditions, addressing loneliness, and fostering resilience.

Linking Evidence to Action

Interventional studies are needed to test strategies addressing burnout, depression, suicidal behaviors, and survivorship of suicide attempts. Depression should be considered and evaluated when healthcare workers exhibit symptoms of burnout. Moreover, the Socio-economic Model of Suicide Prevention (i.e., SESM) can be used to categorize suicide prevention measures in healthcare. Burnout and depression interact to influence mental health outcomes among healthcare professionals, with depression playing a more significant role in predicting suicidal ideation. Despite the demonstrated relationships, critical gaps in knowledge exist in understanding survivorship and in the development and testing of effective interventions. Future interventional multisite research is needed using validated tools to identify best practices in suicide prevention for healthcare professionals.

Identifying Barriers and Enablers for Nurse‐Initiated Care for Designing Implementation at Scale in Australian Emergency Departments: A Mixed Methods Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

The aim of this study was to (i) identify barriers and enablers and (ii) inform mitigating or strengthening strategies for implementing nurse-initiated care protocols at scale in emergency departments (EDs).

Design

Embedded mixed methods.

Methods

The study included four clusters with a total 29 EDs in NSW, Australia. Concurrent quantitative and qualitative data were collected via electronic nursing and medical staff surveys and analysed. Barriers and enablers to implementation were identified and mapped to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Selection of intervention functions and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) enabled development of implementation strategies.

Results

In total, 847 responses from nursing and medical staff (43%) reported four enablers for use and implementation: (i) knowing or being able to learn to use simple nurse-initiated care; (ii) protocols help staff remember care; (iii) carefully considered education programme with protected time to attend training; and (iv) benefits of nurse-initiated care. Nine barriers were identified: (i) lack of knowledge; (ii) lack of skills to initiate complex care (paediatric patients, high-risk medications and imaging); (iii) risk for inappropriate care from influence of cognitive bias on decision-making; (iv) punitive re-enforcement; (v) protocols that are too limited, complex or lack clarity; (vi) perceived lack of support from medical or management; (vii) perception that tasks are outside nursing role; (viii) concern nurse-initiated care may increase the already high workload of medical and nursing staff; and (ix) context. The barriers and enablers were mapped to nine TDF domains, five intervention functions and 18 BCTs informing implementation using strategies, including an education programme, pre-existing videos, audit and feedback, clinical champions and an implementation plan.

Conclusion

A rigorous, systematic process generated a multifaceted implementation strategy for optimising nurse-initiated care in rural, regional and metropolitan EDs.

Implications

Staff wanted safe interventions that did not lead to increased workload. Staff also wanted support from management and medical teams. Common barriers included a lack of knowledge and skill in advanced practice. Clinicians and policymakers can consider these barriers and enablers globally when implementing in the ED and other high-acuity areas. Successful strategies targeting barriers to advanced practice by emergency nurses can be addressed at the local, state and national levels.

Impact

Implementation of new clinical practices in the ED is complex and presents challenges. Key barriers and enablers, including those related to initiating care and workloads in the ED were identified in this study. This research broadly impacts ED staff and policymakers globally.

Reporting Method

Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences (MMR-RHS).

Patient or Public Contribution

Site senior nurse researchers for each cluster worked closely with site stakeholders, including local consumer groups. Consumer councils were engaged at all the sites. Site visits by the research nurses have been an important strategy for discussing the study with key stakeholders.

Trial Registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial: ACTRN12622001480774p

Pediatric Nurses' Challenges in Implementing and Sustaining Clinical Handover in Intensive Care Units: Advocating for the Safety of Critically Ill Paediatric Patients

ABSTRACT

Aim

This study aimed to examine the challenges faced by pediatric nurses in implementing and sustaining clinical handover in intensive care units (ICUs), focusing on identifying key barriers affecting the handover process in these specialised environments.

Background

Pediatric nurses encounter several challenges that hinder the effective implementation of clinical handover in intensive care settings. These challenges can compromise patient safety and care continuity. Understanding these obstacles is essential for identifying areas for improvement and enhancing handover practices in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Method

A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the specialised university hospital for children in Alexandria, Egypt. The sample included 127 nurses who provided direct care to critically ill children. Participants were selected using convenience sampling. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess various challenges encountered during the clinical handover process. The questionnaire covered five key areas: nurse-related challenges, handover quality-related challenges, organisational challenges, environmental challenges and communication challenges. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including multivariate regression analysis. The study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Results

The study found that the most significant challenges during clinical handover were nurse-related (mean = 74.7, SD = 5.6), followed by organisational challenges (mean = 69.2, SD = 16.7). Statistically significant differences were observed in nurses' characteristics, such as gender, age, marital status, years of experience and the place and duration of handover. Nurses who conducted longer handovers or performed them at the bedside reported fewer challenges compared to those who performed handovers at the nursing station or those with shorter durations.

Conclusion

Pediatric nurses in critical care settings face significant challenges in clinical handover, with barriers such as resistance to change, non-standardised language, time constraints and outdated reports being prominent. Female nurses, older nurses and those working in settings with less standardised handover practices reported more difficulties. Addressing these challenges is critical for improving handover processes, ensuring better patient safety and enhancing care outcomes.

Implications for Nursing Practice and Policy

Standardised handover protocols tailored to intensive care workflows, along with targeted training for nurses, are essential to address the identified challenges. These measures will enhance communication, improve handover efficiency and promote patient safety in pediatric ICUs. No patient or public contribution.

Interprofessional and Inter‐Organisational Collaboration in the COVID‐19 Vaccination Programme: Lessons From North Central London

ABSTRACT

Aim

To discuss inter-organisational collaboration in the context of the successful COVID-19 vaccination programme in North Central London (NCL).

Design

An action research study in 2023–2024.

Methods

Six action research cycles used mixed qualitative methods.

Results

Four findings are presented which illustrate inter-organisational collaboration across professional and organisational boundaries: working in the action research group, learning to work as an action research group, working collaboratively in new ways, working outside professional, occupational and organisational silos. These themes are discussed in relation to the literature on interprofessional and inter-organisational collaboration.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 vaccination programme offered a way out of the pandemic. Between December 2020 and February 2022, 2.8 M people were vaccinated by the NCL Vaccination team in an example of inter-organisational collaboration between science, health and community. Staff on the vaccination programme worked inter-organisationally in new ways to achieve this. In NCL several thousand local residents joined the NHS to work with healthcare professionals including nurses, nursing associates and students to deliver the programme in new ways which are illustrative of inter-organisational collaboration.

No Patient or Public Contribution

No PPI within this study.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

The implications for the profession and for healthcare organisations of the findings are that, in contrast to traditional ways of working which have been entrenched in silos of professional knowledge and expertise, health professionals are able to work in new ways and find inter-organisational work satisfying. This has implications for patients as it has the potential to improve communication between very different organisations and as the vaccination programme shows, results in successful public health vaccination rates.

Impact

This study set out to create a public resource for learning (for future pandemics or other works of national effort) to commemorate the collaborative efforts of the diverse vaccination workforce and volunteers involved in the programme. Participation in the COVID-19 vaccination programme had a profound effect on NHS clinical and professional staff, on partners across business and volunteer organisation in North Central London and on volunteers from the public in North Central London. Inter-organisation collaboration has been sustained after the delivery of the vaccination programme in North Central London; innovative ways of working have been introduced in the local community to deliver ongoing vaccinations and wider prevention activities and the partnership between academia and clinical practice. The research findings have had an impact on the research participants and the wider public through the website created as a public resource to commemorate the COVID-19 vaccination programme in North Central London.

Reporting Method

The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) was used as a guide throughout data collection and analysis.

Patient or Public Contribution

The public were involved as participants in this study. They did not participate in the study design.

Nurses' work environment and health promotion in relation to psychological distress symptoms, and sleep disturbance: A structural equation modeling approach

Abstract

Background

The healthcare work environment has numerous stressors that can contribute to distress and poor health outcomes among nurses. The impact of distress can be detrimental, resulting in nurses leaving the profession. Thus, it is critical to explore factors in the work environment that contribute to the distress symptoms and behaviors that promote nurses' health.

Objective

This study aimed to examine the constructs associated with the conceptual model of distress, such as the work environment, specifically workload and the practice environment (quality of care, salary, staffing, time, and satisfaction) and associations with psychological distress, sleep disturbance, and health promotion behaviors in nurses, using structural equation modeling.

Design

This study was a cross-sectional survey design collected as part of the Nurse Worklife and Wellness Study (NWWS) using balanced stratified sampling methods.

Methods

A confirmatory factor analysis tested the factorial structure of the latent constructs using weighted least squares estimation with missing data (WLSMV) for the sample (n = 1170). A structural equation modeling approach examined the direct and indirect associations between workload, practice environment, health promotion behaviors, psychological distress symptoms, sleep disturbance, and health.

Results

Based on the confirmatory factor analysis, the measurement model reported adequate model fit (CFI = 0.96; TLI = 0.95; SRMR = 0.048 and RMSEA = 0.039). The structural model showed that the workload was related to significantly increased psychological distress (β = 1.47, p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (β = 1.22, p < 0.01), and decreased overall health (β = −1.36, p < 0.01). Similarly, a positive practice environment was associated with significantly higher psychological distress (β = 1.61, p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (β = 1.31, p < 0.01), and lower overall health (β = −1.51, p < 0.01). Workload and the practice environment were associated with significantly increased health promotion behaviors such as interpersonal relations, spiritual growth, stress management, physical activity, and nutrition. A statistically significant indirect relationship was found between workload and psychological distress, mediated by health promotion behaviors. Psychological and physical health promotion had restorative effects in relation to decreasing the impact of distress and sleep disturbance while increasing overall health.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the need to improve the work environment by decreasing the nurses' workload and using health promotion behaviors to mitigate nurses' psychological distress. Future studies should focus on exploring distress in the context of non-pandemic work conditions and finding ways to promote coping behaviors in nurses. In addition, healthcare organizations should develop policies and strategies to incentivize nurses' participation in health promotion behaviors to promote their well-being and ultimately stabilize the nursing workforce.

Reducing sedentary behavior improves depressive symptoms among patients with heart failure enrolled in a home‐based mobile health app cardiac rehabilitation

Abstract

Background

Depressive symptoms are common, worsening heart failure (HF) progression and reducing quality of life. While supervised structured exercise training is effective for managing depressive symptoms, it often demands a substantial time commitment or intensive activity that may discourage participation.

Objective

Evaluate the impacts of reducing sedentary time with short bouts of light physical activities or greater intensity levels on depressive symptoms after HF patients' enrollment in a home-based intervention.

Methods

A total of 127 HF patients participated in an experimental two-group design, randomly allocated to either delayed or immediate decreasing sedentary time intervention. The immediate group started the intervention immediately, while the delayed group began after the first group finished their intervention. The 8-week intervention, guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior, focused on interrupting 30 min of sedentary behavior with short bouts of light- or greater intensity physical activities. Demographic and clinical variables were collected at baseline. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline, pre-intervention, and post-intervention. Physical activity (daily steps) was monitored daily during the study period using the Samsung mobile health app.

Results

Both groups demonstrated reduced sedentary time during the intervention, with improvements in HF symptom burden. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms in both groups post-intervention, with a greater reduction seen in the immediate group before the delayed group began the intervention.

Conclusion

The study highlights the effectiveness of interrupting sedentary behavior with light- or greater intensity activities in managing depressive symptoms among HF patients. The home-based intervention, facilitated by mobile technology, provides a feasible and accessible approach to improving mental well-being.

Clinical Relevance

The findings support the broader implementation of home-based interventions addressing sedentary time reduction as a valuable strategy for enhancing the mental health of HF patients, particularly those facing challenges with traditional rehabilitation programs or intense exercise.

Shared decision making for patients with kidney failure to improve end‐of‐life care: Development of the DESIRE intervention

Abstract

Aim

To describe the development of a shared decision making intervention for planning end-of-life care for patients with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals in kidney services.

Background

End-of-life care conversations within standard disease management consultations are challenging for patients with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals. End-of-life care planning is about making difficult decisions in advance, which is why health professionals need shared decision making skills to be able to initiate end-of-life conversations. Health professionals report needing more skills to raise the issue of end-of-life care options within consultations and patients want to be able to discuss issues important to them about future care plans.

Methods

The development design was guided by the UK Medical Research Council's framework and a user-centred approach was applied. Four workshops were conducted with end users. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication for Population Health and Policy interventions was used to shape which questions needed to be answered through the workshops and to present the intervention. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) criteria set the standards to be achieved.

Results

Areas considered significant to a shared decision making intervention were training of health professionals, conversations about end-of-life care, planning and evaluation of the decisions, reporting decisions in health records and repetition of consultation. The development process went through 14 iterations.

Conclusion

An intervention named DESIRE was developed that comprises: (1) a training programme for health professionals; (2) shared decision making conversations; and (3) a patient decision aid. The intervention met 30 out of 33 IPDAS criteria.

Implications for practice

DESIRE is intended to support shared decision making about planning end-of-life care among patients with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals. The study provides important tools for the stakeholders engaged that can be used within different models of care.

Impact

What problem did the study address?

International guidelines recommend health professionals involve patients with kidney failure in making decisions about end-of-life care, but there is variation in how this is implemented within and across kidney services. Furthermore, patients, relatives and health professionals find it challenging to initiate conversations about end-of-life care.

What were the main findings?

The study resulted in the development of a complex intervention, called DESIRE, about shared decision making and planning end-of-life care for patients with kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals in kidney services, including a training programme for health professionals, shared decision making conversations and a patient decision aid.

Where and on whom will the research have an impact?

The research contributes a shared decision making intervention to patients in the later stage of kidney failure, their relatives and health professionals. We believe that the DESIRE intervention could be introduced during consultations with health professionals at an earlier stage of the patient's illness trajectory, as well as being applied to other chronic diseases.

Reporting Method

This intervention development research is reported according to the GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development (GUIDED) checklist and the DEVELOPTOOLS Reporting Checklist.

Patient or Public Contribution

Patients, relatives and health professionals have been involved throughout the research process as part of the research team and advisory board. For this study, the advisory board has particularly contributed to the development process of the DESIRE intervention by actively participating in the four workshops, in the iterations between the workshops and in the preparation of the manuscript.

Impact of authentic leadership on nurses' well‐being and quality of care in the acute care settings

Abstract

Introduction

Both nurses' well-being and quality of care are top priorities of the healthcare system. Yet, there is still a gap in understanding the extent and how authentic leadership influences them. This information is needed to inform the development of effective interventions, organizational practices, and policies. Thus, this study aimed to test the mechanism by which nurses' perception of their managers' authentic leadership impacts nurses' well-being and perception of quality of care, given the role of the nursing practice environment and nurses' psychological capital.

Design

A cross-sectional design was used.

Methods

This study recruited a random sample of 680 nurses from six hospitals in Saudi Arabia. A final sample of 415 completed the surveys, with a response rate of 61%. Structural equation modeling was performed to test the hypothesized model.

Results

The study showed that nurses' perceptions of authentic leadership in their managers positively and directly affect their perceptions of quality of care but do not directly affect nurses' well-being. Both the nursing practice environment and psychological capital fully mediated the relationship between authentic leadership and nurses' well-being. However, the nursing practice environment partially mediated the relationship between authentic leadership and perceptions of quality of care.

Conclusion

The findings contribute to understanding the crucial role of authentic leaders' style in nurses' well-being and quality of care through its positive impact on the nursing practice environment and psychological capital.

Clinical Relevance

Designing interventions and policies that specifically target nursing managers' authentic leadership style has implications for enhancing nurses' well-being and the quality of patient care. Institutional measures are needed to help leaders practice an authentic leadership style to create a positive nursing practice environment and cultivate nurses' psychological capital, both of which contribute to nurses' well-being and attaining a better quality of care. Further work is required to highlight the outcomes of implementing an authentic leadership style relevant to other leadership styles.

A scoping review of the role of policy in mitigating childhood obesity in underserved populations using the RE‐AIM framework

Abstract

Background

Childhood obesity is an escalating crisis in the United States. Health policy may impact this epidemic which disproportionally affects underserved populations.

Aim

The aim was to use the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to assess health policy impact on preventing or treating school-aged children (5 > 18 years) with obesity in underserved populations.

Methods

A scoping review of 842 articles was conducted. Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction.

Results

Twelve studies included subgroup analysis, with four suggesting an impact of policy on at-risk groups. None of the 24 studies fully applied the RE-AIM framework. Policies positively impacted childhood obesity in 12 studies across the sample.

Linking Evidence to Action

Our review revealed inconsistent evidence for the effectiveness of policy on childhood obesity, perhaps due to the lack of focus on the social determinants of health. In addition, many studies did not evaluate the outcomes for underserved populations. Therefore, we propose more attention to social determinants in future legislation and evaluation of policy effectiveness on underserved populations. Findings identify an urgent need for the design, implementation, and evaluation of policies specifically directed to address the inequities of racism, social injustices, and social determinants of health that impact childhood obesity in the United States. Future work needs to identify who was reached by the policy, who benefitted from the policy, and how policies were implemented to address obesity-related health disparities. Nurses should advocate for the evaluation of childhood obesity policies, particularly in underserved populations, to determine effectiveness. Nurses, particularly those trained in population and community health and research, should advocate for policy research that considers inequities rather than controls for these variables. Multi-layered interventions can then be tailored to sub-populations and evaluated more effectively.

National evaluation of DNP students' use of the PICOT method for formulating clinical questions

Abstract

Background

The intent of the PICOT (i.e., Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) method is to formulate focused clinical questions to facilitate the discovery of relevant evidence through systematic searching, with the components of the question serving as the foundation for the search. Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) graduates use evidence-based practices to institute changes in their organizations' systems and policies, thereby yielding positive effects on both patient and system outcomes. Given that the clinical question is the foundation of the evidence-based practice process, DNP graduates' competence in the PICOT method needs to be better understood.

Aims

This analysis aimed to describe how DNP students used the PICOT method to ask clinical questions in their DNP projects.

Methods

Project questions were retrieved from a subset (n = 129, 60.56%) of an existing national random sample of publicly available DNP projects spanning the years 2010 to 2021 from Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education-accredited schools (n = 213). Project questions using the PICOT method were further evaluated with a scoring system of 0 = no and 1 = yes for missing elements, formatting, directional outcome, and project purpose. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more errors. Discussion among five researchers, until agreement was achieved, yielded consensus.

Results

Although the PICOT method was project author-identified in 66 (31.0%) projects, only four (6%) followed the PICOT method. All 66 (100%) were intervention questions. There were 2.74 (SD 1.55) mean errors, ranging from 0 to 6. No questions were missing P or O. Specific errors included missing I 3 (4.5%) or missing C 37 (56%), poor formatting 34 (51.5%), directional outcome 44 (66.7%), and project purpose 38 (57.6%). Thirty-three (50%) of the questions were missing T; however, T is not used for searching, so researchers recalculated the mean error without T (M = 2.24, SD = 1.28, range 0–5).

Linking Evidence to Action

Gaps in the accurate use of the PICOT method to construct clinical questions can lead to biased searches, inaccurate clinical problem identification, and, when used as the project purpose, jumping to non-evidence-based solutions. Academic faculty and clinical educators can mitigate these skewed outcomes and enhance their impact on quality outcomes by helping DNP-prepared nurses shore up this foundational skill.

Nutrition care for older adults with delirium: A scoping review

Abstract

Aims

This scoping review aimed to identify and map the available information on the nutrition care process in older adults with delirium to analyse and summarise key concepts, and gaps, including the barriers and enablers to providing nutrition care for this group.

Design

Scoping review.

Methods

This review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and grey sources in English were considered.

Data sources

Databases searched were CINAHL, Medline, Embase, JBI Evidence-based Practice, Scopus, ProQuest and Google. The initial search was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022 and repeated in October 2023.

Results

The database search identified 1561 articles, 186 underwent full-text review and 17 articles were included. The grey literature search identified eight articles. Malnutrition and delirium were identified as mutually reinforcing, and nutrition strategies were included as part of multicomponent interventions for delirium management. There was no mention of barriers or enablers to nutrition care and minimal descriptive or empirical data available to guide nutrition care processes in this group.

Conclusion

This scoping review revealed a need for further research into nutrition care processes in older patients with delirium, in particular the barriers and enablers, to inform appropriate management strategies in this vulnerable group.

Implications for the profession and patient care

Providing nutrition care for older patients with delirium is important and further practical guidance could help patients, healthcare staff and families.

Impact

This scoping review yielded instructive data suggesting that delirium is an important risk factor for malnutrition and vice versa, which leads to poor patient and health service outcomes.

Reporting method

This scoping review adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and used the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

Patient of public contribution

No patient or public contribution.

❌