Landscape use by large grazers in a grassland is restructured by wildfire

by Aishwarya Subramanian, Rachel M. Germain

Animals navigate landscapes based on perceived risks vs. rewards, as inferred from features of the landscape. In the wild, knowing how strongly animal movement is directed by landscape features is difficult to ascertain but widespread disturbances such as wildfires can serve as natural experiments. We tested the hypothesis that wildfires homogenize the risk/reward landscape, causing movement to become less directed, given that fires reduce landscape complexity as habitat structures (e.g., tree cover, dense brush) are burned. We used satellite imagery of a research reserve in Northern California to count and categorize paths made primarily by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in grasslands. Specifically, we compared pre-wildfire (August 2014) and post-wildfire (September 2018) image history layers among locations that were or were not impacted by wildfire (i.e., a Before/After Control/Impact design). Wildfire significantly altered spatial patterns of deer movement: more new paths were gained and more old paths were lost in areas of the reserve that were impacted by wildfire; movement patterns became less directed in response to fire, suggesting that the risk/reward landscape became more homogenous, as hypothesized. We found evidence to suggest that wildfire affects deer populations at spatial scales beyond their scale of direct impact and raises the interesting possibility that deer perceive risks and rewards at different spatial scales. In conclusion, our study provides an example of how animals integrate spatial information from the environment to make movement decisions, setting the stage for future work on the broader ecological implications for populations, communities, and ecosystems, an emerging interest in ecology.

Physicians’ awareness of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with osteoporosis

by Nachapol Supanumpar, Pagaporn Pantuwadee Pisarnturakit, Natthinee Charatcharoenwitthaya, Keskanya Subbalekha

A serious adverse effect of antiresorptive drugs, which are widely used to treat osteoporosis, is medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Physicians can reduce the risk of MRONJ by educating patients and emphasizing the importance of good oral health. However, limited information is available regarding physicians’ awareness and clinical practices associated with MRONJ. Hence, this study aimed to examine physicians’ awareness related to MRONJ and associated clinical practices. This study was a cross-sectional study conducted from December 2022 to February 2023. An online self-administered questionnaire was sent to physicians in Thailand who prescribed antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis. Most respondents agreed that antiresorptive drugs might cause MRONJ (92.3%), poor oral health increased the risk of MRONJ (84%), and MRONJ is an important consideration in patients with osteoporosis (85%). Of the respondents, 48.1% and 15.5% always referred patients to dentists before and during antiresorptive therapy, respectively. Approximately 60% of physicians informed patients of the MRONJ risk before prescribing antiresorptive drugs, and 30% inquired about patients’ oral symptoms at the follow-up visit. Overall, 44% of physicians advised patients to receive oral health care; the most common reason for not advising this was that respondents did not consider themselves to be adequately knowledgeable to detect oral health problems. These findings indicate that while most physicians who prescribed antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis were aware of and considered MRONJ in their practice, several took insufficient action to prevent it. This highlights the need to emphasize clinical practice guidelines and collaboration between physicians and dentists.