Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain management in chronic kidney disease

by Chi Peng Chan, Babaniji Omosule, Courtney Lightfoot, Ellesha A. Smith, Ffion Curtis, James O. Burton, Paul Gardner, Sarah Jasat, Sherna F. Adenwalla, Jyoti Baharani, Daniel S. March

Background

Chronic pain affects up to 60% of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet remains under-recognised and under-treated. Pain management in this population is complicated by altered drug pharmacokinetics, polypharmacy, and the potential nephrotoxicity of conventional analgesics. Despite the high prevalence and significant impact on quality of life, evidence-based guidance specific to pain management in CKD remains limited.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in reducing chronic pain intensity among people with CKD on dialysis, not on dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients, across all stages of CKD.

Methods

The primary outcome is the effectiveness of interventions in reducing chronic pain intensity as assessed by pain assessment tools. We will conduct a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to the present date to identify studies for chronic pain management in people living with CKD. Study screening will be conducted independently by two reviewers. One reviewer will extract data from each study, with a second reviewer cross-checking for accuracy and completeness. Data will be extracted on study characteristics, participant demographics, intervention components, pain outcomes, and adverse events. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated independently by two reviewers using the GRADE approach. Where applicable, data will be combined in meta-analyses using random-effects models. Additionally, a network meta-analysis will be performed if enough studies are available.

Expected results

This review will synthesise the current evidence for pain management strategies in CKD, by evaluating effectiveness of interventions among people receiving different renal replacement therapy modalities with varying pain and disease phenotypes. Findings will highlight the comparative effectiveness of various interventions while considering their safety profiles specific to the CKD context. The review will identify gaps in the literature and provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research.

Significance

This review seeks to deliver a thorough evaluation of pain management strategies for people living with CKD. This systematic review is supported by the UK Kidney Association (UKKA), and findings will inform the upcoming UKKA guideline on symptoms management in people with CKD, alongside the other symptoms including itch, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms. This review will aid clinicians in making well-informed decisions regarding pain management strategies, ensuring a balance between effectiveness and the specific risks associated with CKD.

‘Wish you were here’: Managers’ experiences of hybrid work in higher education

by Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg, Martina Wallberg, Emmanuel Aboagye, Gunnar Bergström, Christina Björklund, Lydia Kwak, Susanna Toivanen, Irene Jensen

The prevalence of telework increased dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic, and today it is not uncommon to refer to hybrid work as “the new normal” in work life. Leadership plays a pivotal role in hybrid work transitions, underscoring the need for research on post-pandemic managerial practices. This qualitative interview study with 15 professional service managers at a Swedish medical university, working in either central administration or a research department, provides a nuanced understanding of the experiences of implementing hybrid work in a higher education setting. The qualitative content analysis resulted in three main themes and six sub-themes: New ways of organising work (sub-themes: Hybrid work brings new opportunities and needs, and Hybrid work as an ongoing process of change); Changes for employees (sub-themes: Social interaction and sense of community, and Increased work-life balance); and Changes in leadership (sub-themes: Communication with employees and New expectations on managers). The findings of this study provide a more fine-grained understanding of how managers experienced both challenges and opportunities in implementing and managing hybrid working arrangements. Challenges included managing employee expectations and relations, while opportunities included potential improvements in work-life balance. A key conclusion of this study is that managers in hybrid work environments adjust their leadership, especially when communicating and managing relationships within teams and across the organization. Despite the identified challenges and despite managers’ wish to see their employees in person and on site, the interviewed managers are generally optimistic about hybrid work and see it as the future. To address the identified challenges, managers may benefit from networking and exchanging information with other managers in similar situations, as well as support from their organisation.