FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerInternational Wound Journal

Role of nutritional support in nursing practice for improving surgical site wound healing in patients post‐surgery with risk of pressure ulcers

Abstract

To explore the role of nutritional support in nursing practice on postoperative surgical site wound healing in patients undergoing surgery at risk for pressure ulcers. This study adopted a retrospective experimental design and included a total of 60 patients at risk of pressure ulcers, divided into a nutritional support group and a control group, with 30 people in each group. The nutritional support group implemented specific nutritional support measures after surgery, while the control group received standard postoperative care. Outcome measures included redness and swelling scores, edema scores, anxiety assessments, pain scores, bleeding volume, recovery time and incidence of pressure ulcers. The result indicates that patients who received nutritional support exhibited lower postoperative wound redness and swelling scores compared to the control group (3.11 ± 0.45 vs. 4.85 ± 0.74, p < 0.05). Additionally, the nutritional support group showed significantly lower edema scores (2.75 ± 0.37 vs. 3.53 ± 0.62, p < 0.05). Anxiety levels, as measured by the anxiety assessment scale (SAS), were also lower in the nutritional support group (6.52 ± 1.19 vs. 7.60 ± 1.62, p < 0.05). Moreover, the average healing time was shorter for the nutritional support group (7.27 ± 1.36 days) compared to the control group (9.71 ± 1.84 days, p < 0.05). Postoperative pain scores were lower in the nutritional support group (4.13 ± 0.72 vs. 5.43 ± 0.62, p < 0.05), and patient satisfaction scores were higher (9.42 ± 0.76 vs. 7.25 ± 0.81, p < 0.05). Nutritional support has a positive effect on postoperative wound healing at surgical sites in patients at risk of pressure ulcers in nursing practice. It can significantly reduce redness, swelling, edema, anxiety, and pain scores, reduce bleeding, shorten recovery time, and reduce pressure ulcers. incidence rate.

Clinical application of posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap in curing plate exposure after ankle fracture fixation

Abstract

The study aims to evaluate the clinical application of posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap in the treatment of plate exposure after ankle fracture fixation. A posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap was used on 16 patients with plate exposure after ankle fracture fixation in our hospital between July 2018 and July 2021. The time required to harvest the flap, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, the duration of postoperative drainage tube placement, the outcome of the flap and the healing observed at the donor site are reported. The sizes of the flaps were 2.5–7.0 cm × 5.0–18.0 cm and averaged 4.0 cm × 12.0 cm. The time required to harvest the posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap ranged from 35 to 55 min and averaged 45 min. The amount of intraoperative blood loss ranged from 20 to 50 mL and averaged 35 mL. The duration of postoperative drainage tube placement ranged from 3 to 5 days and averaged 4 days. A total of 15 flaps survived and one flap had partial necrosis and survived after conservative treatment. All donor area defects were directly sewed and stitched without complications. There are multiple advantages of the posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap, including simple preparation technique, reliable repair of the defects and without the need for performing microvascular anastomosis. It can be safely used in curing plate exposure after ankle fracture fixation and worth popularizing in grassroots hospitals.

❌