Conectar
To estimate the proportion of Italian nurse managers (NMs) intending to leave (ITL) their positions and to identify associated socio-demographic, job-related, and psychosocial factors.
Cross-sectional study.
Between September and November 2023, 464 NMs from 19 public hospitals completed a case-report form and the short version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II). Latent Class Analysis (LCA) identified ITL profiles, and multiple logistic regression assessed factors associated with ITL.
284 NMs (61.2%; 95% CI 57–66) reported an intention to leave within 12 months. LCA identified two classes: (1) Low-ITL (54%)—mainly outpatient NMs from Central regions with strong relationships with management, good support, work–life balance, and autonomy (55.9% probability of being unlikely to leave). (2) High-ITL (46%)—mainly surgical or critical-care NMs, often from Northern regions, marked by poor management relations, low support and high work–family conflict (80.9% probability of being likely to leave). Multiple regression confirmed that stronger management relations reduced ITL (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46–0.79) whereas high job demands and work–health conflict increased it (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.19–2.04). Northern location also predicted higher ITL (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.03–2.44). Demographics, education, and clinical setting were not significantly associated.
These findings suggest that healthcare organizations should prioritize managerial and organizational strategies targeting modifiable work-related factors to reduce nurse managers' intention to leave. Interventions aimed at improving organizational support, work environment, and job satisfaction may contribute to workforce retention at the managerial level. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of targeted organizational interventions in sustaining nurse manager retention.
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is essential to healthcare quality and safety, integrating scientific evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences. Despite its importance, EBP implementation still faces major challenges. Educational interventions have proven effective in strengthening EBP competencies among healthcare.
To evaluate the impact of a personalized educational intervention on EBP competencies among healthcare professionals. Working at a private tertiary general hospital, comparing performance before and after the intervention.
A randomized controlled trial involving healthcare professionals was conducted. Eligible and consented participants were randomly assigned to either an Intervention Group (IG) receiving an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) course or a Control Group (CG) not receiving the course, stratified by job level, role, and work shift. From the completers, 18 participants were randomly selected for the IG, and all 7 available CG participants were included in the final sample for analysis. All study participants completed two validated instruments: the Assessing Competencies in Evidence-Based Medicine (ACE) and the Fresno Test. The educational intervention consisted of a seven-week course with weekly three-hour sessions, for a total of 21 h. Comparative analyses were conducted using a Linear Mixed Model, adjusted for educational level, job level, time working at the hospital, and weekly workload.
A statistically significant increase in general EBP knowledge was observed in the IG following the intervention, with a mean gain of 19.1%. Separate analysis showed improvements of 10.8% in ACE and 24.2% in Fresno Test scores. No statistically significant changes were observed in the CG. Furthermore, after the intervention, the IG outperformed the CG for both general EBP knowledge and Fresno Test scores on both pre- and post-intervention comparisons.
The educational intervention had a positive statistically significant impact on EBP knowledge and skills among healthcare professionals in the IG compared to the CG. These findings underscore the potential of structured educational initiatives to enhance the quality of clinical practice through improved EBP competencies.
UTN U1111-1322-8443
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely endorsed as a cornerstone for high-quality, patient-centered care. However, its integration into daily clinical routines remains inconsistent, particularly in settings where cultural, educational, and organizational challenges persist. Reliable, contextually adapted tools are essential to measure EBP implementation and guide improvement efforts.
This study aimed to validate the Italian versions of the EBP Implementation Scale and its short-form (3-item) version.
A cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Both versions of the EBP Implementation Scale were translated and culturally adapted in accordance with internationally recognized guidelines. Data were gathered from a national sample of 405 nurses through a combination of convenience and snowball sampling. Psychometric assessment encompassed confirmatory and Bayesian factor analyses, evaluation of internal consistency and test–retest reliability, and measurement invariance testing. All analyses were performed in R Studio.
Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed that both versions (long and short) of the scale measure a single underlying construct. The instruments demonstrated high reliability (ω = 0.96 and 0.87 respectively). Measurement invariance across educational groups was partially established, as the partial scalar invariance model demonstrated acceptable fit (CFI = 0.991, RMSEA = 0.045), suggesting consistent interpretation of the scale across different levels of EBP training. Latent profile analysis revealed distinct subgroups of EBP implementers, with notable differences in latent means (p < 0.001) associated with previous education in evidence-based practice.
The Italian EBP Implementation Scales are valid and reliable tools for assessing EBP implementation behaviors. They can support education planning, monitor practice changes over time, and inform interventions aimed at enhancing evidence-based care.
FreshRSS 