Conectar
“Opiophobia” lacks a clear definition and measurement, but it is commonly used by researchers and healthcare professionals in pain management to describe the underutilization of opioids by patients, caregivers, prescribers, and other healthcare professionals. This inconsistency complicates research and clinical interventions.
This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the conceptualization and operationalization of opiophobia across quantitative studies involving adult populations.
Peer-reviewed articles published before July 2024 were retrieved from four bibliographic databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus) and systematically reviewed. Included studies defined and/or measured opiophobia or opioid stigma among adult patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The review was conducted in two phases: the first phase provided a comprehensive understanding of study characteristics, while the second phase evaluated the conceptualization and measurement of opiophobia.
Thirty-six articles met inclusion criteria. Studies focused on healthcare professionals (n = 23, 64%); adult patients (n = 13, 33%), including 7 studies involving patients with cancer (19%); healthcare professionals and patients (n = 2, 5%); and family caregivers (n = 1, 3%). Among the studies that defined opiophobia (n = 20, 67%), common definitions included fear, prejudice, reluctance, addiction, exaggeration, underutilization, and inappropriate attitudes/beliefs, respectively. Limitations included the predominance of observational designs (n = 32, 89%) and the use of investigator-developed instruments (n = 27, 73%).
Instruments measuring opiophobia focused on opioid-related fears and behaviors. Instrument items that measured opiophobia primarily focused on fears and behaviors resulting from these fears. It remains unclear whether opiophobia is solely fear-based or also includes poor adherence to prescribed opioids. The wide variations in definitions and the use of mostly investigator-developed measures led to inconsistencies among studies. Further research is needed to design specific interventions and determine delivery times.
Although multimodal rehabilitation programs are effective for substance use disorders and widely used, addiction is still a global socioeconomic problem. Providing practical strategies, such as the HeartMath intervention for managing stress at the moment, helps mitigate the physical, emotional, and psychological impacts associated with substance use disorder, promotes resilience, and enhances treatment motivation.
To investigate the effects of the nurse-led HeartMath Training Program on resilience, emotional adjustment, and treatment motivation among patients with substance use disorder.
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was used to carry out this study. This study was conducted at the inpatient unit for patients with addiction at Elmaa'mora Hospital for Psychiatric Medicine in Alexandria, Egypt. The subjects were 130 patients with substance use disorders (65 in each group). Researchers used three tools to collect the necessary data: Tool I Resilience Scale, Tool II Brief Adjustment Scale–6, and Tool III Treatment Motivation Questionnaire.
The difference in resilience, emotional adjustment, and treatment motivation between the study and control groups after the Nurse-Led HeartMath training intervention was statistically significant.
The HeartMath Training Program is efficacious in improving resilience and emotional adjustment among patients with substance use disorder and increasing their treatment motivation.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06437366
Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health concern, with a high prevalence in Egypt. Type 2 diabetes imposes substantial health and economic challenges. Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) programs, such as the Diabetes Conversation Map, have demonstrated promise in enhancing patient knowledge, self-management, and self-efficacy. However, evidence regarding their direct impact remains scarce, necessitating further investigation.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Diabetes Conversation Map program in improving knowledge retention, self-management, and self-efficacy among type 2 diabetes patients in Egypt.
A prospective, parallel, two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Damanhour Health Insurance Outpatient Diabetic Clinic in Egypt. A total of 120 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized into a control group (n = 60), receiving standard diabetes education, and an intervention group (n = 60), attending 8 weekly interactive sessions using the Diabetes Conversation Map. Primary outcomes were assessed using validated questionnaires at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months later.
The intervention group exhibited significant improvements in knowledge, self-management, and self-efficacy compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Additionally, positive correlations between these outcomes were observed post-intervention, replacing negative correlations observed at baseline.
The Diabetes Conversation Map program effectively enhances patient knowledge, self-management, and self-efficacy, supporting its integration into routine diabetes education. Healthcare providers should implement structured, interactive educational interventions to empower patients in managing their condition. Regular follow-ups and reinforcement strategies are necessary to sustain long-term self-efficacy improvements. Policymakers should consider incorporating evidence-based diabetes education into national healthcare programs. Future research should explore digital adaptations of the program to enhance accessibility and engagement.
Registration No: R000061691, Trial ID: UMIN000054044
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential for clinical decision-making, integrating the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and stakeholder values. In Italy, interest in EBP is growing, and a key step in its promotion is adopting tools to assess nurses' beliefs and behaviors toward EBP. While the EBP Beliefs Scale has been translated and validated in multiple languages, it has yet to be adapted for the Italian context.
This study aims to adapt EBP measurement tools for the Italian context and evaluate their psychometric properties.
This study used an observational cross-sectional design. The process of cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation was adopted. A panel of experts culturally adapted the Beliefs Scales (long and short version) through the item and scale content validity (I-CVI, S-CVI). To test the psychometric properties, 409 nurses were asked to complete the two scales. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to validate the factor structure within the Italian context. Convergent validity between the long and short versions of the scale was assessed using the correlation coefficient (r), and the reliability was assessed by computing Cronbach's alpha.
The I-CVI and S-CVI for the long and short version ranged from 0.75 to 1.00. The CFA model performed for the long and short version reported a good fit without the need for further refinements. The Cronbach's alpha was higher than 0.80 for both scales. The correlation of 0.615 (p < 0.01) indicated a moderate to strong positive relationship supporting the convergent validity of the short version in relation to the long version.
In time-constrained settings, the short scale should be utilized for efficient assessments and longitudinal tracking of changes. The long version serves as a complementary tool for in-depth analysis, facilitating a deeper understanding of underlying factors and informing targeted interventions to address specific barriers.
The global population is aging, and it is becoming increasingly common for older people to suffer from multiple diseases. The development of digital health technologies has assisted the self-management of multimorbid older patients. Currently, there is a lack of qualitative review that synthesizes the needs and experiences of multimorbid older patients using digital health technologies for self-management.
To synthesize the needs and experiences of multimorbid older adults using digital health technologies for self-management.
The following six electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. The search timeframe was from construction to November 4, 2024. Thematic synthesis by Thomas and Harden was used for meta-synthesis. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two researchers, and quality was evaluated using the 10-item Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool.
Ten studies were included. Three themes and seven subthemes were synthesized: (1) different impressions and perceptions, (2) challenges of use, and (3) conveniences and benefits. Older adults with multiple medical conditions have positive or negative impressions and perceptions of digital health technologies and experience multiple challenges in their use (lack of expertise, technical and equipment barriers, need support), while at the same time, digital health technologies offer huge benefits for their self-management (improved communication with healthcare professionals, enhanced self-management skills).
This review provides support for healthcare professionals to understand the experiences of multimorbid older adults using digital health technologies for self-management. Healthcare professionals and technology developers should establish collaborative relationships to design comprehensive, usable, and less burdensome digital health technologies for older adults with multiple morbidities. Additionally, comprehensive technical support services should be provided to ensure the effective utilization of these technologies by older adults.
PROSPERO number: CRD42024599433
Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is a leading cause of infant mortality in the United States. Hospitals have implemented infant safe sleep programs with varying measures and degrees of success, but few have demonstrated improvements in hospital-based and home safe sleep practices with nurse subject matter experts (SMEs) and community SUID prevention campaigns.
This project evaluated the impact of a state-wide, evidence-based infant safe sleep program for birthing hospitals using nurse SMEs and a community awareness campaign on nurse knowledge, safe sleep environments, and trends in infant sleep-related deaths.
Between 2016 and 2021, a pre- and post-test quality improvement intervention-based design was used to enroll hospitals and train and embed SMEs to educate peers, conduct practice surveillance and audits, and address practice deviations. A website housed comprehensive resources, and a large-scale community-based social and print media campaign on safe sleep practices occurred. Nurse and practice data from 12 hospitals that fully implemented the program were compared pre- and post-implementation. State-wide survey data for key safe sleep indicators reported by parents were compared from our 12 birthing hospitals to other facilities.
Of trained nurses (N = 902), 83.4% reported making substantial or exceptional progress in being proactive in surveillance of safe sleep environments. Pre- and post-implementation environmental audits showed a significantly higher proportion of infants in safe sleep positions post-implementation (94.3%) than pre-implementation (89.6%) (p = 0.001). Statewide survey data from birth parents discharged from our program hospitals significantly outperformed those discharged from other state facilities. Multi-media campaigns resulted in over 1.4 million impressions on our website. Sleep-related deaths for infants born at four program hospitals dropped 16.1% from 31 in 2018 to 26 in 2021.
A safe sleep program improved hospital-based nurses' knowledge and practice and birth parent's knowledge and behaviors, and it was associated with a decrease in infant sleep-related deaths.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, posing significant challenges to the quality of healthcare services. Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) provides a framework for understanding individual behaviors and guides the development of intervention programs aimed at promoting health-enhancing behaviors.
To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions based on SCT in improving health outcomes among patients with CVD.
From the creation of the databases until September 2024, we searched six databases and manually searched the references included in the study. The outcomes included cardiovascular risk factors (weight, blood pressure, blood lipids), physical capacity (6-min walk test, physical activity, daily steps, exercise self-efficacy), psychological states (anxiety, depression), and health behaviors (self-management, self-efficacy, quality of life). The quality of randomized controlled trials was evaluated with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and quasi-experimental studies were assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tool.
A total of 10 studies, involving 1140 participants, were included in the review. Compared to conventional cardiovascular care, interventions based on SCT were able to lower systolic blood pressure (MD = −6.36; 95% CI [−11.30, −1.41]; p = 0.012), total cholesterol (MD = −0.29; 95% CI [−0.49, −0.09]; p = 0.004), and low-density lipoprotein levels (MD = −0.21; 95% CI [−0.38, −0.04]; p = 0.015) in CVD patients. They also increased the 6-min walk test distance (MD = 33.87, 95% CI [5.40, 62.34], p = 0.02) and daily steps (SMD = 0.77; 95% CI [0.46, 1.09]; p < 0.001), improved physical activity (SMD = 0.65; 95% CI [0.25, 1.06]; p = 0.002) and exercise self-efficacy (SMD = 1.23, 95% CI [0.23, 2.23], p = 0.016), and enhanced quality of life (SMD = 0.75, 95% CI [0.06, 1.43], p = 0.032).
Social cognitive theory-based interventions hold promise for improving health outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. This study provides further insights into the application of SCT in clinical practice. However, given the limited number of included studies and the potential risk of bias, further high-quality research is required to validate these findings.
The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the global nursing shortage, leading to increased turnover intentions among nurses due to heightened workplace stress, burnout, and job dissatisfaction. This study investigates the mediating effects of burnout and job satisfaction on the relationship between professional identity, occupational stress, and nurses' turnover intentions. Additionally, it explores the impact of socio-demographic factors on these relationships in the post-pandemic era.
A cross-sectional study of 338 nurses across 4 hospitals in Israel was conducted between June 2023 and January 2024. Self-reported questionnaires were utilized to measure turnover intention using the Turnover Intention Scale, with professional identity and occupational stress as predictors and burnout and job satisfaction as mediators. A fixed effect path analysis approach was employed to assess the hypothesized mediation model, controlling for hospital-level variance and socio-demographic variables.
The findings revealed that professional identity was negatively associated with burnout (β = −0.26, p < 0.001) and positively associated with job satisfaction (β = 0.25, p < 0.001). Occupational stress was positively associated with burnout (β = 0.57, p < 0.001) and negatively associated with job satisfaction (β = −0.42, p < 0.001). Burnout (β = 0.35, p < 0.001) and job satisfaction (β = −0.10, p = 0.025) were both significantly associated with turnover intentions. Mediation analysis indicated that job satisfaction and burnout fully mediated the relationship between professional identity and turnover intentions, and partially mediated the relationship between occupational stress and turnover intentions.
The study highlights that professional identity mitigates nurse turnover by increasing job satisfaction and reducing burnout, while occupational stress drives turnover intentions by increasing burnout and decreasing job satisfaction. Tailored interventions aimed at enhancing professional identity and addressing occupational stress, particularly in light of pandemic-related challenges, are essential for improving nurse retention and well-being in the post-pandemic era.
Building nursing process competency among beginner nurses is a pivotal need in contemporary, complex, fast-paced nursing practice. However, transitioning from the educational phase to practicing as a nurse can be a significant adjustment. New practitioners often experience a period of shock, which may present challenges in developing nurse competency. Fostering system thinking among those nurses could buffer the negative signs of transition shock and cultivate nursing process competencies at earlier times.
This study explores the relationship between transition shock and nursing process competency among early career nurses and investigates the moderating effect of system thinking on this relationship.
This cross-sectional correlational exploratory study was conducted at four large hospitals in Egypt. Data were collected from 393 nurses from the first of February 2024 to the end of April 2024 using the transition shock scale, the competency of nursing process questionnaire, and the system thinking scale. Correlational and hierarchical regression analyses were used to test the study variables.
A statistically significant negative correlation exists between transition shock, nursing process competency, and system thinking among early-career nurses. System thinking is positively associated with nursing process competency. System thinking positively moderates the relationship between transition shock and nursing process competency among early-career nurses. Transition shock and system thinking account for 23.9% of the variance in nursing process competency among early-career nurses.
Transition shock is an inevitable phenomenon among early-career nurses, negatively affecting their competency in the nursing process. System thinking buffers this adverse effect and significantly augments nursing process competency among this set of nurses. Predicting and mitigating transition shock among early-career nurses is pivotal in building nursing process competency. Nurse educators must develop curricula that cultivate system thinking skills among nursing students, which enables them to buffer transition shock after graduation.
Globally, nurses' patient safety, care quality, and missed nursing care are well documented. However, there is a paucity of studies on the mediating roles of care quality and professional self-efficacy, particularly among intensive and critical care unit (ICCU) nurses in developing countries like the Philippines.
To test a model of the interrelationships of patient safety, care quality, professional self-efficacy, and missed nursing care among ICCU nurses.
A cross-sectional, correlational design study was used. ICCU nurses (n = 335) were recruited via consecutive sampling from August to December 2023 and completed four validated self-report scales. Spearman Rho, structural equation modeling, mediation, and path analyses were utilized for data analysis.
The emerging model demonstrated acceptable fit parameters. Patient safety positively influenced care quality (β = .34, p = .002) and professional self-efficacy (β = .18, p = .011), while negatively affecting missed nursing care (β = −.34, p = .003). Care quality positively and negatively influenced professional self-efficacy (β = .40, p = .003) and missed nursing care (β = −.13, p = .003), respectively. Professional self-efficacy indirectly impacted missed nursing care (β = −.32, p = .003). Care quality (β = −.10, p = .003) and professional self-efficacy (β = .13, p = .003) showed mediating effects between patient safety and missed nursing care.
ICCU nurses' care quality and professional self-efficacy are essential mediating factors that can bolster patient safety practices, hence reducing missed nursing care. Therefore, healthcare organizations, nurse managers, and policymakers should cultivate care quality and self-efficacy by creating support programs and providing a positive practice environment. Nurses and nurse supervisors could directly observe missed nursing care in the ICCU to understand its underreported causes.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has emerged as one of the most common cancers, with increasing survival rates globally. As patients with CRC experience diverse treatment effects corresponding to different survival stages, understanding their unmet needs based on the survival stage is critical to tailor supportive care with limited medical resources.
This study aimed to understand the unmet needs of patients with CRC across survival stages.
This scoping review followed the 5-stage framework established by Arksey and O'Malley. Five online databases were searched with narrative synthesis performed after data extraction.
Fifteen studies were identified for this review, with 12 focusing on the acute survival stage and three reporting on the extended survival stage. Ten studies used validated scales to assess unmet needs, with the Supportive Care Needs Survey being the most common scale. Unmet needs in patients with CRC demonstrate distinct patterns across survival stages. Most studies reported a higher prevalence of unmet needs during the extended survival stage compared to the acute survival stage. Unmet emotional needs predominate during the acute survival stage, whereas unmet physical needs become most prominent in the extended survival stage.
Healthcare providers are encouraged to conduct assessments tailored to the specific survival stage, with particular emphasis on addressing unmet needs during the extended survival stage. The development of standardized scales is recommended to comprehensively assess the unmet needs of patients with CRC.
Outcomes associated with rapid response teams (RRTs) are inconsistent. This may be due to underlying facilitators and barriers to RRT activation that are affected by team leaders and health systems.
The aim of this study was to synthesize the published research about facilitators and barriers to nurse-led RRT activation in the United States (U.S.).
A systematic review was conducted. Four databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2023 for peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies reporting facilitators and barriers to RRT activation. Studies conducted outside the U.S. or with physician-led teams were excluded.
Twenty-five studies met criteria representing 240,140 participants that included clinicians and hospitalized adults. Three domains of facilitators and barriers to RRT activation were identified: (1) hospital infrastructure, (2) clinician culture, and (3) nurses' beliefs, attributes, and knowledge. Categories were identified within each domain. The categories of perceived benefits and positive beliefs about RRTs, knowing when to activate the RRT, and hospital-wide policies and practices most facilitated activation, whereas the categories of negative perceptions and concerns about RRTs and uncertainties surrounding RRT activation were the dominant barriers.
Facilitators and barriers to RRT activation were interrelated. Some facilitators like hospital leader and physician support of RRTs became barriers when absent. Intradisciplinary communication and collaboration between nurses can positively and negatively impact RRT activation. The expertise of RRT nurses should be further studied.
FreshRSS 