Z-Coding for Social Contributors to Health in Colorado Federally Qualified Health Centers

Background Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) provide services to individuals facing systemic barriers to health equity and are disproportionately affected by adverse social determinants of health. To better align healthcare services with the needs of those individuals experiencing health inequities, it is essential to screen for and document problematic social contributors to health in electronic health records, which health systems have been mandated to document by 2026. Objectives The aims of this study were to 1) determine the prevalence of documented social contributors to health Z-codes among patients receiving care through Colorado nurse-led FQHCs across urban, rural, and frontier settings; and 2) estimate healthcare utilization and expenditures associated with the presence of documented social contributors to health Z-codes compared to a matched sample of patients without that Z-code documentation. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of the Colorado All Payers Claim Database. Social contributor of health ICD-10 Z-codes, reflecting problematic social structural circumstances as defined by Healthy People 2030, were extracted from patients receiving care in FQHCs. Social contributor of health-related charges were computed using propensity matching to compare individuals with and without documented social contributors of health. Results Documentation of social contributors of health Z-codes was notably low. Housing instability was the most common Z-code documented. Chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and heart disease were the most prevalent comorbidities among those with identified social contributors of health. The majority of patients with social contributors of health Z-codes were insured through Medicaid and lived in rural areas. Persons with documented social contributors of health had significantly higher predicted annual medical expenditures compared to those without documentation. Discussion The low prevalence of social contributors of health coding aligns with previous studies and represents a missed opportunity to provide targeted interventions for populations experiencing adverse social contributors. These findings underscore the need for strategizing and implementing plans to identify and code social contributors of health, especially in facilities serving those experiencing health inequities. Improved documentation of social contributors to health can facilitate data-driven resource allocation and tailored interventions to address adverse social determinants and promote health equity.

Study Protocol Evaluating Breastfeeding for Mother–Infant Dyads Experiencing Infant Ankyloglossia

Background Tongue-tie is associated with nipple pain and early breastfeeding cessation. To date, research has been limited by small sample sizes and a dearth of evidence on the effects of tongue-tie on infant feeding symptoms and physiologic breastfeeding mechanics. Objectives In this article, we describe the protocol for our study exploring infant feeding, negative breastfeeding symptoms, maternal anatomy, and physiologic sucking data between infants with and without tongue-tie. Methods A prospective cohort study design is being employed. Over 8 weeks, three visits will be conducted with a sample of mothers and their infants without tongue-tie and a sample of mothers and their infants diagnosed with tongue-tie undergoing treatment via frenotomy. The aims of the study were to compare breastfeeding symptoms, breast anatomy, infant feeding symptoms, feeding efficiency, and nutritive sucking parameters between infants with and without tongue-tie, further comparing these metrics pretreatment and posttreatment via frenotomy with the non-tongue-tied age-matched counterparts. Results This study is currently ongoing. Discussion Tongue-tie is an everyday problem; clear guidelines are needed to decide whether to treat it. This novel, innovative, and multidisciplinary research study aims to fill critical gaps in understanding the physiological and functional effects of tongue-tie on breastfeeding, offering evidence to inform better clinical decisions and support effective interventions.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Emergency Department Use Among Older Adults With Asthma and Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Work Environments

Background Older adults from specific racial and ethnic minoritized groups experience disproportionately higher asthma prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. They also often use emergency departments (EDs) to manage their asthma. High-quality primary care can improve asthma control and prevent ED use. Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide an increasing proportion of primary care to minoritized patients, yet often, they work in poor work environments that strain NP care. Objectives We examined whether racial and ethnic health disparities in ED visits among older adults with asthma are moderated by the NP work environment in primary care practices. Methods In 2018–2019, we used a cross-sectional design to collect survey data on NP work environments from 1,244 NPs in six geographically diverse states (i.e., Arizona, California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington). We merged the survey data with 2018 Medicare claims data from 46,658 patients with asthma to assess the associations of all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, ED visits with NPs’ work environment, and race and ethnicity using logistic regression. Results More than one third of patients with asthma visited the ED in 1 year, and a quarter of them had an ambulatory care-sensitive condition ED visit. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely than White patients to have all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive condition ED visits. NP work environment moderated the association of race with all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive condition ED visits among patients with asthma. Greater standardized NP work environment scores were associated with lower odds of all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive condition ED visits between Black and White patients. Discussion Disparities in ED visits between Black and White patients with asthma decrease when these patients receive care in care clinics with more favorable NP work environments. Preventing unnecessary ED visits among older adults with asthma is a likely benefit of favorable NP work environments. As the NP workforce grows, creating favorable work environments for NPs in primary care is vital for narrowing the health disparity gap.

Health Implications of Black Identity Among Latinos: A Call for Afro-Latina Representation in Maternal Child Health Research

No abstract available

Comparison of Weighting Methods to Understand Improved Outcomes Attributable to Public Health Nursing Interventions

Background The complex work of public health nurses (PHNs) specifically related to mental health assessment, intervention, and outcomes makes it difficult to quantify and evaluate the improvement in client outcomes attributable to their interventions. Objectives We examined heterogeneity across parents of infants served by PHNs receiving different interventions, compared the ability of traditional propensity scoring methods versus energy-balancing weight (EBW) techniques to adjust for the complex and stark differences in baseline characteristics among those receiving different interventions, and evaluated the causal effects of the quantity and variety of PHN interventions on client health and social outcomes. Methods This retrospective study of 4,109 clients used existing Omaha System data generated during the routine documentation of PHN home visit data. We estimated the effects of intervention by computing and comparing weighted averages of the outcomes within the different treatment groups using two weighting methods: (a) inverse probability of treatment (propensity score) weighting and (b) EBWs. Results Clients served by PHNs differed in baseline characteristics with clients with more signs/symptoms. Both weighting methods reduced heterogeneity in the sample. EBWs were more effective than inverse probability of treatment weighting in adjusting for multifaceted confounding and resulted in close balance of 105 baseline characteristics. Weighting the sample changed outcome patterns, especially when using EBWs. Clients who received more PHN interventions and a wider variety of them had improved knowledge, behavior, and status outcomes with no plateau over time, whereas the unweighted sample showed plateaus in outcomes over the course of home-visiting services. Discussion Causal analysis of PHN-generated data demonstrated PHN intervention effectiveness for clients with mental health signs/symptoms. EBWs are a promising tool for evaluating the true causal effect of PHN home-visiting interventions.

Chronic Pain and Pain Management in Older Adults: Protocol and Pilot Results

Background Chronic pain occurs in 30% of older adults. This prevalence rate is expected to increase, given the growth in the older adult population and the associated growth of chronic conditions contributing to pain. No population-based studies have provided detailed, longitudinal information on the experience of chronic pain in older adults; the pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies that older adults use to manage their chronic pain; and the effect of chronic pain on patient-reported outcomes. Objectives This article aims to describe the protocol for a population-based, longitudinal study focused on understanding the experience of chronic pain in older adults. The objectives are to determine the prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain; identify the pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain treatments used; evaluate for longitudinal differences in biopsychosocial factors; and examine how pain types and pain trajectories affect important patient-reported outcomes. Also included are the results of a pilot study. Methods A population-based sample of approximately 1,888 older adults will be recruited from the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago’s AmeriSpeak Panel to complete surveys at three waves: enrollment (Wave 1), 6 months (Wave 2), and 12 months (Wave 3). To determine the feasibility, a pilot test of the enrollment survey was conducted among 123 older adults. Results In the pilot study, older adults with chronic pain reported a range of pain conditions, with osteoarthritis being the most common. Participants reported an array of pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain strategies. Compared to participants without chronic pain, those with chronic pain reported lower physical and cognitive function and poorer quality of life. Data collection for the primary, longitudinal study is ongoing. Discussion This project will be the first longitudinal population-based study to examine the experience and overall effect of chronic pain in older adults. Pilot study results provide evidence of the feasibility of study methods. Ultimately, this work will inform the development of tailored interventions for older patients targeted to decrease pain and improve function and quality of life.

Methodology for Analyzing Qualitative Data in Multiple Languages

Background Translation strategies are commonly used for qualitative interview data to bridge language barriers. Inconsistent translation of interviews can lead to conceptual inequivalence, where meanings of participants' experiences are distorted, threatening scientific rigor. Objectives Our objective is to describe a systematic method developed to analyze multilingual, qualitative interview data while maintaining the original language of the transcripts. Methods A literature review of translation strategies, cross-language, and multilingual qualitative research was conducted. Combined with criteria for qualitative content analysis and trustworthiness, the methodology was developed and used for a qualitative descriptive study. Results The study had interview data in both English and Spanish. The research team consisted of both native Spanish and English speakers, who were grouped based on language. Verbatim transcription of data occurred in the original languages. All codes were kept in English, allowing the research team to view the data set as a whole. Two researchers within each group coded each transcript independently before reaching a consensus. The entire research team discussed all transcripts, and finally, major themes were determined. Participants' quotes remained in the original language for publication, with an English translation included when needed. Discussion Analyzing transcripts in the original language brought forth cultural themes that otherwise may have been overlooked. This methodology promotes conceptual equivalence and trustworthiness that is paramount in cultural, linguistic, and social determinants of health research to advance health equity.

An Evaluation of the Multifactorial Model of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment

Background Up to 45% of patients report cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). A variety of characteristics are associated with the occurrence and/or severity of CRCI. However, an important gap in knowledge of risk factors for CRCI is the relative contribution of each factor. The multifactorial model of cancer-related cognitive impairment (MMCRCI) is a conceptual model of CRCI that can be used to evaluate the strength of relationships between various factors and CRCI. Objectives The purpose of this study was to use structural regression methods to evaluate the MMCRCI using data from a large sample of outpatients receiving chemotherapy (n = 1,343). Specifically, the relationships between self-reported CRCI and four MMCRCI concepts (i.e., social determinants of health, patient-specific factors, treatment factors, and co-occurring symptoms) were examined. The goals were to determine how well the four concepts predicted CRCI and determine the relative contribution of each concept to deficits in perceived cognitive function. Methods This study is part of a larger, longitudinal study that evaluated the symptom experience of oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Adult patients were diagnosed with breast, gastrointestinal, gynecological, or lung cancer; had received chemotherapy within the preceding 4 weeks; were scheduled to receive at least two additional cycles of chemotherapy; were able to read, write, and understand English; and gave written informed consent. Self-reported CRCI was assessed using the attentional function index. Available study data were used to define the latent variables. Results On average, patients were 57 years of age, college educated, and with a mean Karnofsky Performance Status score of 80. Of the four concepts evaluated, whereas co-occurring symptoms explained the largest amount of variance in CRCI, treatment factors explained the smallest amount of variance. A simultaneous structural regression model that estimated the joint effect of the four exogenous latent variables on the CRCI latent variable was not significant. Discussion These findings suggest that testing individual components of the MMCRCI may provide useful information on the relationships among various risk factors, as well as refinements of the model. In terms of risk factors for CRCI, co-occurring symptoms may be more significant than treatment factors, patient-specific factors, and/or social determinants of health in patients receiving chemotherapy.