Conectar
To compare the individual and combined effects on 90-day mortality among four critically ill survivor groups: normal (without ICU-acquired delirium or ICU-acquired weakness), delirium-only (with ICU-acquired delirium only), weakness-only (with ICU-acquired weakness only) and delirium–weakness (combined ICU-acquired delirium and weakness).
A prospective cohort study consecutively recruited delirium-free critically ill patients admitted to six medical ICUs at a university hospital. Delirium was assessed once daily for 14 days (or until death or ICU discharge) using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Participants who were discharged from the ICUs were assessed for weakness using the Medical Research Council scale. A summed score below 48 defines ICU-acquired weakness. These survivors were evaluated again for 90-day mortality. The study is reported using the STROBE checklist.
Delirium developed in 107 (43.2%) participants during their first 14 days of ICU stay; 55 (22.2%) met criteria for weakness by ICU discharge. Participants with delirium were at increased risk for also developing ICU-acquired weakness, and the 90-day mortality was 18.2%. Independent of age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score at ICU admission, delirium-only and weakness-only were not associated with higher 90-day mortality, while participants in the delirium–weakness group had a 3.69-fold higher risk of death, compared to those who were normal during the ICU stay. A non-significant interaction was found, suggesting the joint effect of delirium and weakness on mortality is not higher than the sum of both effects individually.
Mortality is substantially high among critically ill survivors who experience both delirium and weakness, although no additive effect on mortality was observed when these conditions occur together. Our findings highlight the urgent need to optimise ICU care by prioritising the prevention, early identification and management of these two common ICU-acquired conditions.
Study participation and completion of all assessments.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04206306
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between symptom clusters and self-management among maintenance haemodialysis (MHD) patients.
MHD patients experience disease progression and multiple symptom burdens that severely impact quality of life, and self-management of symptoms may significantly improve patient-reported outcomes.
A cross-sectional study.
This cross-sectional descriptive study included 194 patients undergoing MHD. The patients were assessed using the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) and the Haemodialysis Self-Management Instrument (HD-SMI). We used descriptive analysis, exploratory factor analysis, Pearson's correlation analysis and linear regression analysis to examine (1) the level of individual self-management, (2) the presence of symptom clusters by symptom severity and (3) the correlation between symptom clusters and self-management behaviours. This study was conducted in accordance with the STROBE checklist.
The top five most severe symptoms among the patients were itching, feeling tired or lack of energy, difficulty sleeping, dry mouth and dry skin. We identified five groups of symptoms: (1) poor sleep, (2) neuromuscular, (3) gastrointestinal, (4) skin irritation and (5) psychological. In the present study, MHD patients reported low to moderate levels of self-management behaviours (50.84 ± 10.56), and low self-management ability was correlated with greater severity of the five symptom clusters (p < 0.01). Linear regression analysis revealed that all five symptom clusters were included in the regression equation, explaining 30% of the total variance in self-management skills among MHD patients.
Enhanced awareness of symptom clusters and comprehensive symptom management are necessary to improve patients' quality of life.
Nursing practices should incorporate comprehensive symptom assessments to help patients develop effective self-management strategies to improve quality of life.
FreshRSS 