Conectar
To explore whether a delay from referral to first contact with nurse-led community health services is associated with the likelihood of subsequent emergency department attendance.
We use individual linked administrative data on use of community health and hospital services. We identify a cohort of 343,721 individuals referred to community health services in England by their primary care provider in 2019. We then track their subsequent community healthcare contacts and emergency department attendances.
We exploit variation in the time to contact caused by weekend delays, which create longer times to first contact for people referred later in the working week. The main analysis compares patients referred on Thursday with those referred on Tuesday.
We show that 6.7% of patients referred on Thursday wait an extra two days for their first community contact relative to those referred on Tuesday. Despite this delay, we find no evidence that people referred on Thursday are more likely to have a subsequent emergency department attendance compared to those referred on Tuesday.
We do not find delayed community health services contact to be associated with an increased risk of emergency attendance amongst patients referred to community services by their primary care provider. This suggests that short delays in contact time are not detrimental for this group.
Shifting care from hospital to community settings is a key priority for health systems internationally. In England, community health services face significant staffing shortages, limiting the extent to which services can be responsive and support the desired strategic shift. Our findings suggest that these constrained community providers could use their limited capacity to prioritise responding quickly to other patients without harming those referred via primary care.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
(1) Explore the role of core abdominal exercise in people living with a stoma in Australia; (2) determine whether the presence of a parastomal hernia influenced participant symptoms and complications, health status, experiences with different types of exercise, recall advice given by healthcare professionals; (3) determine whether there is an appetite for supervised/supported exercise programs.
A cross-sectional, anonymous survey.
Between August and September 2022. The survey included Likert scales and a single free text response. Logistic regression and Cramer's V were used to explore relationships between variables.
Approximately half (45.5%) of 105 participants reported a parastomal hernia. Those with a parastomal hernia were less likely to recall having received advice (15.20%) or demonstration (9.40%) pertaining to exercise. Less than a quarter of all participants completed strengthening (23.80%) or vigorous (22.90%) exercise. Fear of vigorous exercise, abdominal exercise and heavy lifting were high in both groups. Relationships between healthcare advice, exercise-related fears and avoidance of heavy lifting were observed.
Many Australians living with a stoma are not achieving physical activity recommendations. While exercise behaviours did not differ between people with and without a parastomal hernia, recall of healthcare advice around exercise did. Fear-avoidance relationships were observed.
Most people living with a stoma do not recall advice about core abdominal exercises. Healthcare practitioners need to be aware of fear-avoidance related to lifting among people living with a stoma. This was the first study in Australia, exploring perspectives and experiences regarding exercise; providing foundations for future research particularly exercise programs.
This study adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and the reporting of survey studies (CROSS).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
FreshRSS 