Conectar
To explore how chronically ill patients, family members and nurses perceive and experience patient participation in nursing care within a Chinese hospital context.
Focused ethnography.
The study was conducted in a Chinese public hospital over 8 months between February and September 2021. Data were generated through 90 h of participant observation and 30 semi-structured interviews, including individual and dyadic interviews with 10 nurses, 17 patients and 7 family members. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through an inductive and iterative process.
An overarching theme ‘participation as relational, holistic and dynamic’ was developed, comprising three themes: (1) participation as fulfilling individual responsibility, (2) family members as co-participants and (3) participation as an evolving multidimensional practice. These themes suggest that participation was understood as a relational responsibility enacted through everyday interactions. Family members were actively involved in care processes, and participation extended across physical, intellectual and emotional dimensions. Digital information and technologies further reshaped participation, creating new opportunities and tensions in everyday care.
Patient participation in nursing care extends beyond autonomy-based models and is shaped by relational responsibilities, family involvement and evolving digital healthcare contexts.
To promote patient participation, policies and practices should recognise relational and family-based dimensions of care. Healthcare organisations should foster environments that support collaborative participation among patients, families and nurses. Training and education should be developed to promote nurses' digital literacy, cultural competence, ethical sensitivity and relational communication to support participation in contemporary care contexts.
This study broadens prevailing autonomy-centred understandings of patient participation by demonstrating how participation is co-constructed through relational responsibilities and family involvement. The findings offer insights for nursing practice and policy in culturally diverse and increasingly digital healthcare environments.
COREQ.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Investigate if UK healthcare professionals have the resources and knowledge to provide cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation to people with ischaemic non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA), and explore what type of care healthcare professionals believe patients should receive.
Electronic cross-sectional survey of UK healthcare professionals, circulated between 7 January and 7 March 2022.
Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed inductively.
Healthcare professionals lacked knowledge and capacity to care for this patient group. Healthcare professionals recommended patients receive two unsupervised sessions per week, for 8 weeks, at home and in person. Recommend include physical activity advice/exercise training, health behaviour support, psychological support, smoking cessation, dietetics/nutritional support, weight management, counselling and medication titration.
In the UK, healthcare professionals lack resources and knowledge to provide cardiovascular presentation and rehabilitation to people with INOCA. Recommended care reflected care currently available to other patient groups.
There is a need to create and evaluate educational material for healthcare professionals.
Before people with INOCA are offered cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation it was necessary to determine if healthcare professionals had sufficient clinical knowledge and resources to provide care. We conclude that additional training and resources are required to enable health professionals to deliver care to people with INOCA.
Researchers should create and evaluate educational material for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation programmes. Programmes also require additional resources to deliver care to this group.
Reporting adheres to the Cherries guidelines.
A patient (SB) was consulted on study design, data collection, and interpretation, and manuscript preparation.
To classify Italian home care models based on structural characteristics, process factors and stakeholder perceptions.
This is a secondary analysis of the AIDOMUS-IT multicentre cross-sectional study, conducted in Italy between July 2022 and December 2023.
Data were collected via online surveys completed by 33 Local Health Authority Nursing Directors, home care nurses and patients. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify different organisational models based on structural and process-related factors. Nurses' and patients' perceptions of care were described for each identified cluster.
The analysis identified three distinct organisational home care models: The ‘multidisciplinary model’, in which nurses reported high dissatisfaction due to organisational complexity and excessive workloads. In the ‘nurse-centred model’, characterised by publicly employed nurses, strong leadership, and a supportive work environment, patients reported high levels of satisfaction. The ‘performance-based model’, which operated with a lower nurse-to-patient ratio, reduced service hours, and greater reliance on external professionals. Nurses in this model reported high job satisfaction but also a greater intention to leave, while patient satisfaction was lower.
This study underscores the importance of leadership, resource management, and a supportive work environment in influencing both job satisfaction and patient outcomes in home care settings.
Policymakers could use these findings to refine care models and improve service delivery.
Limited research has examined the organisational structures of home care services, which are important for professionals' organisational well-being, patient safety, and quality of care. This study identified three distinct organisational home care models that could be used to refine care approaches and improve service delivery.
This study respects the EQUATOR guideline for observational studies (STROBE).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To examine whether self-reported thriving at work is associated with biomarkers of stress, inflammation, neuroplasticity and neurodegeneration in nurses.
A cross-sectional study.
An online questionnaire measuring thriving at work was administered to nurses in a teaching hospital in Michigan, U.S. over 5 weeks in 2024. A subsample of 100 questionnaire respondents provided blood samples for biomarker analysis. Multiple regression was used to identify self-reported and biomarker predictors of nurse thriving. Cluster analysis was used to distinguish between nurses with high and low levels of thriving based on a combination of self-report and biomarker data.
Higher self-reports of individual and work-related resources predicted higher thriving. Cortisol, a stress hormone, was significantly and inversely associated with thriving. No blood-based biomarkers of inflammation or neuroplasticity predicted thriving. Neurofilament light chain, a marker of neurodegeneration, was not a direct predictor but modified the effects of interpersonal and work resources on thriving.
Biological markers do play a role in nurses' thriving at work and may contribute important complementary information to that provided by nurse self-reports.
Nurses thrive in a work situation characterised by positive reports of individual, interpersonal and work resources and lower levels of stress. Efforts to enhance thriving could positively impact nurses' well-being and conditions for providing high-quality patient care.
This study addressed the question of whether self-reported thriving at work among nurses is reflected in biomarkers of stress, inflammation, and neurocognitive health. A profile of high self-reported work-related resources and low cortisol distinguished higher levels of nurses' thriving from lower levels. Organisational efforts to enhance nurses' thriving can positively impact nurses' health, their work environment, and patient care.
We followed the STROBE checklist in reporting this study.
No Patient or public contribution.
To develop and evaluate a questionnaire for measuring factors that contribute to thriving at work among nurses.
A cross-sectional study.
An online questionnaire was administered in March 2024 to nurses in a community teaching hospital in Michigan, US. Questionnaire content was based on a literature search and was pilot tested among nursing professionals within the hospital system. Questionnaire factor structure was examined with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with split-half sample validation.
Based on exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, a three-factor solution presented the best model, with factors comprised of 15 items measuring individual resources (3 items), work resources (6 items) and interpersonal aspects of the nursing work environment (6 items). Reliability estimates for all three factors exceeded 0.80, indicating good internal homogeneity. The questionnaire also demonstrated acceptable split-half validity and reliability.
The questionnaire presented here provides a potentially useful tool for measuring and evaluating thriving at work among nurses.
A better understanding of factors that enhance nurse thriving would lay the foundation for targeted interventions aimed at improving the nursing work environment and nurse well-being. Enhancing nurse thriving could have a potentially positive impact on patient care.
This study addressed the need to understand factors that contribute to thriving in nursing work. The questionnaire that was developed revealed a three-factor solution measuring individual nurse resources, work environment resources and work interpersonal resources. By measuring thriving among nurses, hospitals and other healthcare organisations are taking an important first step in identifying interventions to enhance the nursing work environment, nurse well-being and potentially the quality of patient care.
We followed the STROBE checklist in reporting this study.
No patient or public contribution.
To assess healthcare professionals' digital health competence and its associated factors.
Cross-sectional study.
The study was conducted from October 2023 to April 2024 among healthcare professionals in Italy, using convenience and snowball sampling. The questionnaire included four sections assessing: (i) socio-demographic and work-related characteristics; (ii) use of digital solutions as part of work and in free time, and communication channels to counsel clients in work; and DigiHealthCom and DigiComInf instruments including measurements of (iii) digital health competence and (iv) managerial, organisational and collegiality factors. K-means cluster analysis was employed to identify clusters of digital health competence; descriptive statistics to summarise characteristics and ANOVA and Chi-square tests to assess cluster differences.
Among 301 healthcare professionals, the majority were nurses (n = 287, 95.3%). Three clusters were identified: cluster 1 showing the lowest, cluster 2 moderate and cluster 3 the highest digital health competence. Most participants (n = 193, 64.1%) belonged to cluster 3. Despite their proficiency, clusters 2 and 3 scored significantly lower on ethical competence. Least digitally competent professionals had significantly higher work experience, while the most competent reported stronger support from management, organisation, and colleagues. Communication channels for counselling clients and digital device use, both at work and during free time, were predominantly traditional technologies.
Educational programmes and organisational policies prioritising digital health competence development are needed to advance digital transition and equity in the healthcare workforce.
Greater emphasis should be placed on the ethical aspects, with interventions tailored to healthcare professionals' digital health competence. Training and policies involving managers and colleagues, such as mentoring and distributed leadership, could help bridge the digital divide. Alongside traditional devices, the adoption of advanced technologies should be promoted.
This study adheres to the STROBE checklist.
None.
This study aimed to explore the direct and indirect effects of secondary traumatic stress (STS) on nurses' perceived work ability and the effect of these two variables on job satisfaction, organisational turnover intention and intention to leave the nursing profession.
A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to November 2023.
Data were collected by sending an online survey to a convenience sample of nurses. Instruments for data collection included a 37-item questionnaire divided into three sections: (i) socio-demographics, job satisfaction, organisational turnover intention, and intention to leave the profession; (ii) perceived work ability assessed through the Work Ability Index (WAI); (iii) STS measured with the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale.
Two hundred seventy-one nurses completed the questionnaire. STS negatively and statistically impacted on WAI, and it was a direct determinant of intention to leave the nursing profession. WAI showed a direct, positive and significant impact on job satisfaction and it was a significant partial mediator in the relationship between STS and job satisfaction. Job satisfaction mediated between WAI, the intention to leave the nursing profession, and the organisational turnover intention.
STS negatively impacted nurses' work ability, influencing their job satisfaction through the mediation of WAI, whereas job satisfaction independently affected nurses' organisational turnover intention. Moreover, STS was a positive and direct determinant of the intention to leave the nursing profession.
Nurses, as helping professionals, are exposed to extreme stressful events resulting from the traumatic experiences of patients. STS in nurses can lead to emotional exhaustion, turnover intention, job dissatisfaction and reduced work ability. The findings from this study offer insights that can help shape organisational health policies aimed at reducing STS, preserving nurses' work ability, enhancing job satisfaction and mitigating turnover intentions within and outside the nursing profession.
This study followed the STROBE checklist guidelines for cross-sectional studies.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore patient participation in decision-making during nursing care experienced by patients with chronic diseases, family members and nurses.
Focused ethnography.
This study included an 8-month fieldwork in a Chinese hospital. Fieldnotes from 90 h of participant observation and 30 semi-structured interviews (10 nurses, 13 patients, three family members, and four with both patients and family members present) were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Patient participation in decision-making was facilitated in the form of co-determination, which respected patients' relational autonomy. However, participation required further development or was challenged in the form of unilateral determination, constraining relational autonomy. Interpersonal relationships among nurses, patients and family members played a significant role in promoting patient participation in decision-making.
A relational autonomy framework was identified to understand patient participation in decision-making within nursing care. While patient participation is encouraged and autonomy is respected in some situations, paternalistic approaches still persist in clinical practice.
Enhancing nurses' awareness of involving patients and family members in decision-making is needed. The findings highlight the need for better integration and implementation of existing guidelines to support healthcare staff, patients and family members. They also point to the importance of developing culturally relevant frameworks to promote patient participation in decision-making in nursing care.
This research provided insight into the experiences of chronically ill patients, family members and nurses regarding patient participation in decision-making during inpatient nursing care within a non-Western context. Interpersonal dynamics are highlighted as a key element influencing patient participation.
The study is reported using the COREQ checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 