Conectar
To explore how frail older patients experience their stay and nursing care during boarding time at the emergency department.
A qualitative explorative interview study.
Purposive sampling was used, with a two-step selection process: (1) Patients 65 years or older spending at least 4 h at the emergency department waiting for a hospital bed, referred to as boarding time, were (2) screened for frailty using the FRail Elderly Support researcH group screening instrument. If screening identified a patient as frail, they were eligible for an interview. Individual semi-structured interviews (n = 19) were conducted during patients' boarding time at the emergency department. Data was collected between March and April 2019. The theoretical Fundamentals of Care framework shaped the interview guide. Interviews were transcribed and an inductive latent content analysis was performed.
The findings resulted in four main categories: Frail older patients felt disregarded, defenceless, and resigned during boarding time at the emergency department, yet also hopeful. The experience of hope resulted from confidence in the nurses, good nursing care, patience towards one's situation, and hope in emergency care.
The frail older patient experienced boarding time in the emergency department through an overarching theme: ‘being left in no-man's land in the emergency department but still feeling hopeful’. A trusting nurse–patient relationship, integrating the provision of fundamental care, is a favourable factor for the well-being of the frail older patient.
The study addressed the increased number of older adults with complex health needs, coupled with overcrowded emergency departments. Frail older patients perceive the boarding time as being left in a ‘no-man's-land’, addressing unclear information and lack of caregiver responsibility. This highlights the need for tailored guidelines and care practices that promote person-centred care and ensure safety for this vulnerable group in emergency settings.
Not applicable.
To justify the use of focus group interviews with patients and healthcare professionals within a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach inspired by the theory of the French philosopher Paul Gustave Ricoeur.
Methodological guidance and discussion grounded in Ricoeur's theory on narrative, dialogue, threefold mimesis and interpretation.
This phenomenological-hermeneutical approach to focus group interviews yields significant, in-depth understandings of lived experiences from both patients and healthcare professionals.
Ricoeur-inspired phenomenological-hermeneutical focus group interviews with patients and healthcare professionals offer a promising approach for exploring and generating new, valuable insights into the complexities of clinical nursing practice. Thus, this paper argues for an integration of focus group interviews and a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach within nursing science.
The approach has significant implications for nursing practice. By incorporating Ricoeur-inspired dialogue-based collective voices of patients and healthcare professionals in focus group interviews, nursing practices can be refined, leading to improved patient care and more effective clinical interventions. Thus, this approach advocates for a broader adoption of Ricoeur-inspired focus group interviews in nursing research and in health research in general to enhance the understanding and development of clinical models.
No available EQUATOR guidelines were applicable to this methodological paper, as no new data were created or analysed.
As this is a methodological paper, no new patient or public contributions are included.
To explore how youth understand and manage risk associated with food allergy in everyday life, aiming to inform future advanced nursing and care initiatives.
Qualitative study based on critical psychological practice research.
Data was generated through participant observation and informal interviews during a 2-day camp with youth aged 18–23years (n = 10), diagnosed with food allergy in childhood. Data analysis used thematic analysis informed by a critical psychology theoretical framework.
Risk associated with food allergy is an integrated aspect of the youth life trajectories. The allergy clinic plays a crucial role in how they come to understand and manage risk. Paradoxically, knowledge of risk fosters safety as well as uncertainty. Bodily awareness plays a crucial role in managing food allergy, but minor bodily sensations can trigger anxiety and fear of anaphylaxis. Establishing routines emerges as a key strategy for managing risk, as routines reduce anxiety and facilitate participation in everyday social activities.
The study highlights the complexity of managing food allergy in the everyday life of youth. How risk knowledge is translated from the clinic into everyday life varies and impacts risk management strategies in different ways.
HCP must address both physical and psychosocial aspects of living with the risk associated with food allergy. Individually tailored risk communication that considers personal circumstances and experiences can help reduce anxiety and support strategies for managing food allergy in everyday life.
Integrating patients' everyday perspectives and risk management into healthcare fosters personalised care. Nurses and doctors should help patients bridge the gap between medical advice and its practical application, addressing both physical and emotional aspects of managing health risks.
The SRQR guideline for reporting qualitative research.
Patient representatives were involved in developing the protocol, research questions and study aims.
FreshRSS 