Overuse of CT scans is associated with multiple harms, such as an increased risk of cancer development, particularly in children. However, the rate of CT scan use is high and unwarranted worldwide.

This study aimed to identify the patterns and reported indications for head CT scans ordered for non-traumatic paediatric cases in Palestine.

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study based on a desk review.

The study was carried out from June 2024 to September 2024 in five hospitals located in five major Palestinian governorates in the West Bank.

The study included records of children aged 14 or younger, presenting with non-traumatic complaints and having undergone head CT between January 2020 and September 2024. A total of 3715 patient records were explored, of which 2977 were included in the final analysis; 1764 (59.3%) males and 1213 (40.7%) females.

A pilot review of 100 records was conducted, and the data collection spreadsheet included demographic and clinical characteristics, presentations, reported reasons for CT requests, CT results, and information on lumbar puncture (LP) performance.

The mean age of patients was 4.3 years (SD±3.3), with 59.3% aged 3 to 11 years, and 47.7% presenting to hospitals in northern governorates. The most commonly reported presentation was fever and convulsion (8.2%), followed by convulsions (7.7%), and a combination of fever, headache and vomiting (6.5%). Only 12.9% of the CT scans yielded positive findings, including dilated ventricles (19.3%), sinusitis (18.8%), brain oedema (12.9%), and brain mass (11.1%). Most CT scans were requested to check for contraindications to LP, with only 4.1% having a positive CT finding indicating a contraindication. At the multivariate level, a positive CT result was associated with being a neonate, having a past medical condition, ordering CT to check for contraindication to LP and presenting with convulsions.

CT scans were found to be overused without justification, particularly for ruling out contraindications to LP. The development of clear and specific national guidelines is recommended. This process can be supported through training, decision support tools, alternative management pathways and specialist consultations to ensure compliance. Additionally, enhancing reporting quality and using health information systems are vital for monitoring and improving radiological safety.