Evidence-based practice (EBP) has been in existence for more than 30 years and is recognized as the standard to achieve high quality care.
To examine EBP beliefs, competence, implementation self-efficacy, organizational culture and readiness, access to mentors and assess relationships between nurse characteristics and EBP variables in a large healthcare system in six U.S. states.
A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design was used to conduct a web-based anonymous survey of registered nurses in a large multistate healthcare system throughout the western US. Measures included: EBP Competency Self-Assessment Scale, the EBP Mentoring Scale, and the Short forms of the EBP Beliefs Scale, EBP Implementation Scale, the Organizational Culture and Readiness Scale for System-Wide Integration of Evidence-Based Practice.
A total of 1468 nurses completed the survey from 36 hospitals in six U.S. states. Overall, participants rated themselves competent in only one competency (asks clinical questions). EBP beliefs followed by implementation self-efficacy scores were highest. Total scores for EBP implementation showed the strongest positive correlation with EBP competency followed by beliefs and mentorship with culture and readiness, the least strong relationship. EBP competency, beliefs, and implementation increased with educational attainment. EBP mentorship scores were low across the system.
The study continues to demonstrate nurses' low perceptions of their EBP competency. Compared to previous studies, nurses in this sample reported their EBP competency higher; however, they still rated themselves above competence in only one statement. This underscores an urgent need for comprehensive education and robust support mechanisms. It is imperative that healthcare organizations establish access to experienced mentors and cultivate organizational structures to empower nurses to master EBP, thereby enhancing patient outcomes and advancing overall quality of care.
To describe a sample of healthcare professionals' responses to the valid and reliable Climate and Health Tool and compare participant characteristics relating to Climate and Health Tool subscales.
Observational, cross-sectional, multi-site study.
An electronic survey containing the Climate and Health Tool was administered to healthcare professionals across a large, multi-state health system in the Western United States with a committed effort to reducing carbon emissions.
One thousand three hundred and sixty-three participants reported moderately elevated levels of awareness and concern around climate impacts on health and motivation to participate in climate protective actions. Respondents reported moderate levels of climate-protecting behaviours at home and low levels at work. Females were more concerned and motivated. Medical staff and respondents reporting familiarity with system environmental initiatives reported more awareness and behaviours at home to preserve climate health.
Healthcare professionals are concerned and motivated to decrease climate impacts on health yet take little action at work to preserve the climate. Because of the intersection of climate change, health, and healthcare, healthcare organizations should prioritize and support meaningful action for healthcare professionals to meet community climate health needs.
Healthcare organizations committed to contributing to climate solutions can use this research to increase healthcare professionals' education, engagement, and impact to preserve the climate and health of communities.
Healthcare is a major contributor to carbon emissions, yet healthcare professionals' awareness, motivation, concern, and behaviours related to climate change and health were not clear. Our research showed healthcare professionals are aware and concerned about climate impacts on health but reported low levels of workplace behaviours to protect the climate. The findings of our research will impact healthcare professionals and healthcare organizations to focus efforts on climate-preserving behaviours.
This manuscript followed the STROBE guidelines.
None.