To explore expectations and experiences of nurses and physicians with remote care monitoring for breast cancer patients within the Norwegian specialist health service.
Qualitative exploratory study.
Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine nurses and physicians before and after the implementation of remote patient monitoring. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Three key themes were developed: (1) ‘Navigating patient empowerment: Reassurance, misinterpretation and guidance in remote patient monitoring communication’; (2) ‘Digital care impacts the workflow: Efficiency gains and hidden burdens’; and (3) ‘Clinical judgement in a digital context: Balancing standardisation and clinical discretion’.
While remote patient monitoring increased flexibility and targeted follow-up, it also reshaped roles and workloads and introduced new interpretive demands that often lack formal delegation, highlighting the need for clearer task allocation and organisational support.
Remote patient monitoring expands nurses' roles in symptom assessment and digital follow-up. As such, clear role boundaries and support for clinical judgement are essential for its successful implementation.
The results are relevant for management in healthcare services, nurses and other healthcare professionals implementing remote patient monitoring.
The study followed CORQ guidelines.
Four user representatives with lived experience of breast cancer contributed to the design of the study and gave input regarding the interview guide.
To assess perceived patient safety competencies among nursing students and to examine their associations with their perceptions regarding clinical learning environment and unfinished nursing care.
An international comparative cross-sectional study.
A total of 1442 nursing students from the Czech Republic, Italy, Slovakia, and Türkiye participated between February and December 2025. Data were collected using the Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey, the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher scale, and the Unfinished Nursing Care Survey for Students. Descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, Spearman correlations, and multivariate general linear modelling were applied.
Students reported significantly higher patient safety competencies in clinical compared with academic settings (p ≤ 0.001). Significant cross-country differences were observed across all competency domains (p ≤ 0.001). Perceived patient safety competencies were positively correlated with the overall quality of the clinical learning environment (r = 0.356–0.420; p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with unfinished nursing care (r = −0.107 to −0.171; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pedagogical atmosphere, premises of nursing care, supervisory relationship, and particularly the role of the nurse teacher were significant predictors of patient safety competencies.
The development of nursing students' patient safety competencies is closely linked to the quality of clinical learning environments. Strengthening educational and organisational conditions within clinical placements may play an important role in preparing future nurses for safe clinical practice.
Improving the quality of clinical learning environments, strengthening supervision, and addressing unfinished nursing care may support the development of nursing students' patient safety competencies and contribute to safer patient care.
The study was carried out according to the STROBE checklist.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Gender biases in healthcare approaches lead to inequities in patient health outcomes, historically affecting women and gender minorities the most. In medicine, the concept of gender medicine explicitly addresses these disparities. Although Miers introduced the term gender-sensitive care in nursing two decades ago, there is still no consensus on how to define this phenomenon within the nursing discipline.
To conduct an operational concept analysis of gender-sensitive nursing.
A systematic literature review was performed using Walker and Avant's concept analysis method. This approach allowed for the identification of antecedents, defining attributes, empirical referents and consequences, as well as the proposal of model cases to illustrate the findings.
A total of 34 articles were analysed. Three antecedents were identified: healthcare system accessibility, organizational commitment to equity and education from a gender perspective. Four defining attributes emerged: gender-aware nurses, legitimization of care, implementation of a gender-sensitive approach in nursing management and leadership, and the integration of gender assessment in the nursing process. Three key consequences were also identified: patient empowerment, harm prevention and minimization, and improvement in the quality and effectiveness of nursing care. Additionally, various instruments and strategies were found to operationalize the empirical referents of the concept. Model cases were proposed to exemplify the synthesized evidence.
Far from being an abstract concept, gender-sensitive nursing is a measurable and actionable phenomenon that can be promoted in clinical practice through various empirical indicators.
Gender-sensitive nursing legitimizes individual experiences shaped by gender identity and fosters structural improvements that empower patients. Gender-sensitive nursing is a measurable and actionable phenomenon that can be promoted in clinical practice through various empirical indicators.
Codes of ethics are, for many, important documents that define the key values and behaviours expected of healthcare professionals. They are also documents that have been widely criticised. These criticisms range from being vague to failing to provide guidance on many important issues. Codes, however, vary substantially in their scope, content and the guidance they provide.
This scoping review sought, in the context of comparative studies of codes, to examine the form (i.e., the structure of the code, its contents, principles or rules for example) and function (what the code says it does, either explicitly or implicitly) of codes, along with their points of con/divergence.
A systematic search was carried out using Scopus, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Medline.
Thirty-one papers met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Results suggest that while there were a number of similarities seen across codes, there were also substantial points of divergence related to the content of codes and structure. These differences were seen across professions, countries and time, suggesting that culture, history, politics and perhaps even geography influence the content of codes.
These findings are discussed in light of the broader literature that examines and critiques codes.
To determine the prevalence of MARSI associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) in oncology and haematology patients, analyse the type of injury and identify risk factors.
A prospective descriptive study was conducted from 9 June 2021 to 8 February 2022. The study population was oncology and haematology patients with a PICC. The variables to be studied included the presence of MARSI in relation to PICC maintenance, injury type, time to onset, mean healing time, and type of treatment received. A descriptive analysis of the entire sample was performed. Chi-square and Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to identify risk factors, depending on the nature of the variables.
The sample studied was 342 PICCs inserted in 309 patients, 49% (n = 169) women, and the mean overall age was 62.12 years (SD: 12.33). Seventy-six per cent were oncology and 24% haematology patients. The prevalence of MARSI was 32% (n = 111). The most common type of injury was erythema in 39% (n = 42). The mean duration of the lesion was 20.90 days (SD: 31.44). Alkylating agents, among others, were identified as a risk factor.
The results indicate a high prevalence of MARSI. In agreement with the literature, mechanical injuries are the most frequent, and some antineoplastic treatments are a risk factor. This study may help to identify areas for improvement and design strategies for the prevention and treatment of MARSI.
This study has implications for clinical practice, as it helps to identify areas for improvement and the most relevant clinical practice guideline recommendations to avoid this adverse event.
No patient or public contribution.