Conectar
Authentic leadership holds great potential to impact positive nursing and organizational outcomes. However, authentic leadership's connection to organizational culture, self-efficacy, and work engagement remains underreported.
To investigate the associations of authentic leadership, organizational culture, self-efficacy, and work engagement among nurses.
Cross-sectional and correlational design employing consecutive sampling in recruiting nurses (n = 534) between May and October 2024. Four validated self-report scales were used to collect data. Structural equation modeling analysis was used to examine the study variables' interrelationships.
Organizational culture significantly predicted authentic leadership (β = 0.91, p = 0.004), while authentic leadership significantly influenced both self-efficacy (β = −0.16, p = 0.041) and work engagement (β = 0.57, p = 0.001). Meanwhile, self-efficacy directly and positively influences work engagement (β = 0.24, p = 0.002). Organizational culture had significant indirect effects on both self-efficacy (β = −0.14, p = 0.042) and work engagement (β = 0.48, p = 0.001) through the mediation of authentic leadership. Finally, self-efficacy mediated the association between authentic leadership and work engagement (β = −0.04, p = 0.002).
The study shed light on the complex and interwoven relationships among several essential constructs—specifically, authentic leadership, organizational culture, self-efficacy, and work engagement. These factors collectively contribute to the creation and maintenance of a dynamic and supportive working environment for nurses.
To identify and address ethical challenges in doctoral supervision within nursing and health sciences and propose strategies to overcome them.
Following PRISMA guidelines, this mixed-method systematic review synthesises findings from quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies published in English between 2014 and 2025. Studies were included if they examined ethical challenges in doctoral supervision and strategies to address them within nursing and health sciences. Exclusion criteria encompassed reviews, books, editorials, opinion papers, conference papers, studies unrelated to nursing or health sciences or published before 2014.
A systematic search was conducted in CINAHL, Education Source, ERIC, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, yielding 1100 citations.
The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the STROBE checklist for quantitative studies and the COREQ framework for qualitative studies. The findings were then synthesised and thematically organised.
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria: four quantitative, four qualitative and three mixed methods. Ethical challenges in doctoral supervision emerged at three levels: individual (e.g., misaligned expectations, inadequate feedback, student adjustment difficulties), institutional (e.g., high student–supervisor ratios, limited support structures), and cultural (e.g., differing norms around autonomy and academic authority). Supervisors also reported role conflicts. Strategies to address these challenges included improved communication, supervision agreements, institutional support and targeted training.
Ethical challenges in supervision are shaped by individual, institutional and cultural factors. Addressing them requires multi-level strategies, including clear expectations, feedback mechanisms, structured training and culturally sensitive supervision practices. Applying ethical principles fosters a transparent and supportive academic environment that enhances doctoral outcomes.
Universities should adopt multi-level strategies, including supervisor training, mentorship structures and culturally informed policies, to strengthen the ethical integrity and effectiveness of doctoral supervision.
What problem did the study address?: This study synthesises ethical challenges in doctoral supervision within nursing and health sciences, focusing on communication barriers, institutional constraints and the transition from clinical practice to academia. What were the main Findings?: Misaligned expectations between supervisors and students, inadequate feedback and structural limitations, negatively impact the quality of supervision. Doctoral students struggle to adapt to academic expectations, while supervisors face challenges in balancing multiple roles. Effective communication, institutional support and targeted training programmes are essential for improving supervisory experience. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: The research will inform universities and institutions offering doctoral education in nursing and health sciences. It will benefit doctoral students, supervisors and academic administrators by providing insights and strategies to enhance supervision quality and promote ethical practices.
This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
No patient or public involvement.
For nurse leaders to excel in leadership roles in the clinical world of informatics, a comprehensive understanding of nursing informatics as translated within the broader scope of health informatics including clinical informatics and business intelligence is necessary. The translation of nursing informatics in the comprehensive scope of health informatics is not consistently taught in graduate nursing leadership curricula. Collaboratively, from an interprofessional education stance, a graduate nurse informatics course was re-visioned using translational pedagogy: the idea of teaching related concepts by translating each and vice versa. Specifically, we translated nursing informatics amid health informatics concepts including business intelligence. Leadership students in the re-visioned course experienced the ability to visualize, conceptualize, and understand how work in information systems impacts broader aspects of clinical and business decision-making. Looking at nursing informatics through the lens of health informatics will develop students' ability to visualize, conceptualize, and understand how work in information systems has an impact on the broader aspects of clinical decision-making and support. Further, this paradigm shift will enhance students' ability to utilize information systems in leadership decision-making as future knowledge workers. 
FreshRSS 