Conectar
To assess healthcare professionals' digital health competence and its associated factors.
Cross-sectional study.
The study was conducted from October 2023 to April 2024 among healthcare professionals in Italy, using convenience and snowball sampling. The questionnaire included four sections assessing: (i) socio-demographic and work-related characteristics; (ii) use of digital solutions as part of work and in free time, and communication channels to counsel clients in work; and DigiHealthCom and DigiComInf instruments including measurements of (iii) digital health competence and (iv) managerial, organisational and collegiality factors. K-means cluster analysis was employed to identify clusters of digital health competence; descriptive statistics to summarise characteristics and ANOVA and Chi-square tests to assess cluster differences.
Among 301 healthcare professionals, the majority were nurses (n = 287, 95.3%). Three clusters were identified: cluster 1 showing the lowest, cluster 2 moderate and cluster 3 the highest digital health competence. Most participants (n = 193, 64.1%) belonged to cluster 3. Despite their proficiency, clusters 2 and 3 scored significantly lower on ethical competence. Least digitally competent professionals had significantly higher work experience, while the most competent reported stronger support from management, organisation, and colleagues. Communication channels for counselling clients and digital device use, both at work and during free time, were predominantly traditional technologies.
Educational programmes and organisational policies prioritising digital health competence development are needed to advance digital transition and equity in the healthcare workforce.
Greater emphasis should be placed on the ethical aspects, with interventions tailored to healthcare professionals' digital health competence. Training and policies involving managers and colleagues, such as mentoring and distributed leadership, could help bridge the digital divide. Alongside traditional devices, the adoption of advanced technologies should be promoted.
This study adheres to the STROBE checklist.
None.
To describe the development and refinement of the Flinders Fundamentals of Care Assessment Tool for Clinical Practice through stakeholder feedback. The tool, based on the Fundamentals of Care Framework, supports healthcare leaders and clinicians in assessing fundamental care in a practical and user-friendly manner that embraces rather than minimises the inherent complexity of this care delivery as it occurs in practice.
Multi-method study informed by participatory action principles.
Data collection involved an anonymous online survey and cognitive interviews with key stakeholders internationally to gauge perspectives on the clarity, usability, and acceptability of the tool. Data were collected between October–December 2023. Quantitative, categorical data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed via content analysis.
Participants described the Tool as Comprehensive, Practical, and Useful. Participants liked the visual representation of results in the form of bar and radar diagrams, which aided in interpreting the outcomes. The main suggestions for improvement were: (1) Simplifying items relating to the ‘Context of Care’ dimension of the Fundamentals of Care Framework; (2) Reducing similarity between some items; (3) Separating or simplifying items with multiple components; and (4) Clarifying terminology.
Based on stakeholder feedback, the Flinders Fundamentals of Care Assessment Tool for Clinical Practice is now digitised and includes a comprehensive instruction manual and definitions for each element of the Fundamentals of Care Framework assessed within the tool. The tool supports healthcare leaders and clinicians to assess fundamental care delivery at multiple levels—individual, team, unit/ward, organisational—identifying areas of strength and improvement to inform decision-making, planning, and quality improvement. The tool offers a way of assessing fundamental care holistically as a multi-dimensional construct rather than as a series of disaggregated tasks, better reflecting and capturing the complex reality of fundamental care delivery.
The Flinders Fundamentals of Care Assessment Tool for Clinical Practice supports real-time feedback (i.e., immediate visualisation of results), facilitating its integration in clinical practice to support enhanced fundamental care delivery.
Seeking stakeholder feedback has enhanced the relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of the Flinders Fundamentals of Care Assessment Tool for Clinical Practice, facilitating its use as a decision-making and planning tool to support improved fundamental care delivery across clinical settings.
This study is reported using the CROSS and SRQR guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
The Fundamentals of Care (FoC) Framework emphasises that care quality depends not only on clinical tasks but also on interpersonal relationships and the organisational context in which care is delivered. Although patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) have gained relevance in capturing these aspects, tools based on the FoC Framework remain limited in non-English-speaking settings.
To psychometrically validate the Spanish version of the FoC Intelligence Modelling Tool (FoC-IMT) and explore predictive relationships among the FoC dimensions: Context, Relationship and Integration of Care.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1053 hospitalised patients in southern Spain. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) were performed, alongside a mediation analysis using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to examine directional relationships among constructs.
EFA and CFA supported a two-factor model—Context and Integration of Care—with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.97). CFA showed a moderate correlation between these factors. However, PLS-SEM mediation analysis revealed a directional model in which Context influences Relationship (β = 0.39), which in turn predicts Integration of Care (β = 0.89). Although embedded within Integration under CFA, the Relationship showed independent predictive power in PLS-SEM, validating its conceptual importance. This aligns with the foundational assumption of the FoC Framework: that caregiving quality is shaped not only by tasks or procedures but by the broader environment and interpersonal relationships in which care occurs.
The Spanish FoC-IMT Tool is a valid, reliable instrument for assessing person-centred care. The predictive model highlights the pivotal role of therapeutic relationships in delivering integrated, high-quality care.
Hospitalised patients contributed directly by responding to the FoC-IMT survey, thereby shaping the psychometric validation and predictive model. Patients were not involved in the study design, conduct or manuscript preparation.
To describe the level of family decision-making self-efficacy and its associated factors among Chinese family members of ICU patients.
Cross-sectional descriptive quantitative study.
Using convenience sampling, 154 ICU patients and their family members from two tertiary hospitals completed a paper-based questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics of patients and their family members, patients' disclosure of preferences to their family members, and family members' decision-making self-efficacy, anxiety and depression, uncertainty of illness, coping and social support. The data were analysed using independent-samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression.
The average scores of self-efficacy in treatment, comfort promotion and facing death decision-making were 4.3 (SD = 0.6; range = 1–5), 4.2 (SD = 0.6; range = 1–5) and 3.5 (SD = 0.6; range = 1–5), respectively. Active coping was a predictor of self-efficacy in treatment, comfort-promoting and facing death decision-making. Patients' disclosure of preferences regarding mechanical ventilation, family members' anxiety and illness uncertainty were predictors of self-efficacy in treatment decision-making. Patients' disclosure of preferences regarding expensive medications was a predictor of self-efficacy in comfort-promoting decision-making, and patients' age was a predictor of self-efficacy in facing death decision-making.
Chinese family members of ICU patients reported relatively high self-efficacy in treatment and comfort promotion decision-making but lower self-efficacy in facing death decision-making. Active coping plays a critical role in enhancing decision-making self-efficacy across these three types of decisions. The predictors of decision-making self-efficacy varied according to the specific type of decision.
For Chinese family members of ICU patients, targeted strategies to strengthen their active coping skills are key to enhancing their confidence in making decisions with or for patients. Patients' disclosure of preferences to their family members is helpful for improving family members' confidence in making treatment and comfort promotion decisions. Extra support is especially needed for end-of-life decision-making, particularly when the patient is younger.
This research informs future interventions by highlighting active coping and patients' disclosure of preferences to family members as key factors to strengthen decision-making self-efficacy among Chinese family members of ICU patients. However, family members' decision-making self-efficacy appears to be culturally specific, underscoring the need to design family-centered critical care approaches that are tailored to cultural contexts in other settings. Besides, while our research found a positive association between anxiety and self-efficacy in treatment decision-making, the relationship between them requires further investigation.
STROBE guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To examine the relationships among perceived organisational support, perceived job security, self-efficacy and job engagement among newly recruited nurses and the mediating role of perceived job security and self-efficacy in the relationship between perceived organisational support and job engagement.
Cross-sectional study.
This study employed a multicentre cross-sectional survey design and used the Perceived Job Security Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Perceived Organisational Support Scale and Job Engagement Scale to survey 536 newly recruited nurses (from September 2023 to April 2024). Structural equation modelling was used to test the effects of perceived organisational support, perceived job security and self-efficacy on job engagement.
In the study model, perceived organisational support, perceived job security and self-efficacy all directly affect job engagement among newly recruited nurses. Additionally, perceived organisational support can be used to predict job engagement through self-efficacy and perceived job security.
Perceived organisational support, job security and self-efficacy are positive predictors of job engagement among newly recruited nurses. Furthermore, perceived job security and self-efficacy mediate the relationship between perceived organisational support and job engagement.
Newly recruited nurses, as key agents in clinical nursing practice, play a crucial role in reducing nursing errors and improving work efficiency. The results of this study show that perceived organisational support, perceived job security and self-efficacy positively predict job engagement among newly recruited nurses. Clinical nursing managers and educators should assist newly recruited nurses in enhancing their perceived organisational support to foster job engagement by bolstering their perceived job security and self-efficacy.
This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
To systematically compare nurse-led versus traditional rehabilitation in improving clinical outcomes for stroke survivors.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data were extracted from Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (searched up to July 2024). Analyses with standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) as the estimates were performed in Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0. Randomized controlled trials investigating nurse-led stroke rehabilitation with outcomes such as mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) of quality of life, self-efficacy, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL), Barthel Index (BI), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), and pain were included. Sensitivity analyses and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were performed.
A total of 12 articles were included. The quality assessment indicated that most studies did not have a serious risk of bias. Nurse-led rehabilitation showed significant improvements in SS-QOL (SMD: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.26, 5.40; very low-quality evidence), depressive symptoms (GDS-15, SMD: −2.21; 95% CI: −2.80, −1.63; high-quality evidence), pain (SMD: −1.61; 95% CI: −2.14, −1.08; high-quality evidence), and BI (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.48; low-quality evidence). However, there were no significant differences in MCS, PCS, self-efficacy, or NIHSS between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results for SS-QOL and BI were unstable and should be interpreted with caution.
Nurse-led rehabilitation is effective in improving psychological outcomes, particularly depression (GDS-15) and pain, although this high-quality evidence is based on a single study. Functional independence (BI) and SS-QOL are also improved, but the evidence for these outcomes is of low quality and highly unstable in sensitivity analyses. No significant benefits are found for other outcomes. The evidence quality varies, and future high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Incorporating nurse-led rehabilitation into stroke guidelines and implementing standardized depression screening programs and non-pharmacological pain interventions in community rehabilitation could be beneficial for populations with depressive symptoms and chronic pain.
This study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for transparent reporting of systematic reviews.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Updating recent reviews and enriching the available evidence with expert opinions on the challenges and expected reforms needed in doctoral education across Europe.
A dual design based on a rapid review and an online survey.
The PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between January 2020 and June 2025 using the terms “PhD” AND “nursing”. In parallel, an online survey with open-ended questions was distributed to a purposive sample of academic experts in each European country. Findings from the literature were juxtaposed and integrated with the data from the expert survey and integrated.
A total of 23 studies and 26 expert opinions. Doctoral nursing education in Europe is facing seven key challenges regarding: (1) institutions and their structure, (2) supervision, (3) candidates, (4) research process and outcomes, (5) professional development and career progression, (6) international collaboration and (7) paradigm-related concerns. Six anticipated changes/recommendations were identified in (1) structural and policy reforms, (2) supervision and mentoring, (3) candidate recruitment, retention and support, (4) financial and institutional support, (5) professional development and career recognition, (6) collaboration and internationalisation. While some challenges and changes were confirmed by the literature, others emerged from the experts' insights.
Complex challenges are faced by European doctoral nursing education, some under-researched as issues of supervision and candidate experience. Strengthening structures, mentorship and international collaboration is essential to align education with academic standards and healthcare needs.
Efforts are needed at the European level to strengthen doctoral education in nursing to ensure well-prepared academic and clinical nurses.
Findings may support in the development of more cohesive and high-quality doctoral nursing programs across Europe and inform targeted reforms.
The rapid review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To investigate the clinical outcomes and predictors associated with the severity of new-onset pressure injuries in hospitalised patients with multiple comorbidities.
Retrospective cohort study.
We retrospectively collected data on hospitalized patients. The severity of pressure injury was defined as per the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel. Outcome measures included short-term mortality and discharge to extended care facilities.
A total of 2150 hospitalised patients were screened, and 186 (8.7%) developed new-onset pressure injuries, including 84 classified as stage I and 102 as stage II. The Braden scale score and time from admission to pressure injury onset were significantly associated with new-onset stage II pressure injuries. Patients with stage II pressure injuries had a significantly higher risk of being discharged to extended care facilities compared to those with stage I pressure injuries (24% vs. 12%, p = 0.041). The short-term mortality rate was high in the total cohort (34%) but was not significantly different between the two groups. The worse Braden scale, lower body mass index, history of stroke and presence of stage II pressure injuries were significant predictors of discharge to extended care facilities.
New-onset Stage II pressure injuries significantly increased the risk of discharge to extended care facilities. Furthermore, this study expands the potential clinical utility of the Braden Scale by demonstrating its association not only with the risk of pressure injury development but also with the initial severity of injuries once they occur. These findings support its role in early risk stratification and targeted nursing interventions.
This study highlights the importance of early identification and prevention of pressure injuries and the potential role of the Braden scale in minimizing injury severity, reducing healthcare utilization, and improving quality of life.
STROBE guidelines.
None.
To describe the factors that characterise nursing programs that continue to attract a high number of applicants even though the total number of applicants is declining.
A qualitative embedded case study in Italy on 2025.
A purposive sample of four undergraduate nursing programs for which there were more applicants than places in the last three academic years, compared to the rest of the macro-region, where an average ratio of 0.8 applicants/place was documented. Key informants (dean, clinical practice coordinator, nurse educators, students) from each program were involved. A semi-structured, open-ended interview was conducted focusing on the factors that make the identified nursing programs attractive. The recorded interviews (n = 19) were analysed thematically by triangulating the data. A member check was also conducted.
Five factors make a nursing program attractive: (1) the strategic location of the university, (2) the reputation and influence of the nursing program, (3) the structured, innovative, and open-oriented nursing curriculum, (4) the quality of the tutorial system and (5) the program's commitment to student support and development.
Even in times of declining enrollment and fewer applicants, certain factors can make a nursing program magnetic.
The map of emerging factors can serve as a strategy to help nursing programs attract students and improve their overall appeal.
What problem did the study address? ○
In some countries, there is a downward trend in applicants to the nursing profession, raising serious concerns about the growing global nursing workforce gap.
○With the decline in applicants, the long-term sustainability of nursing programs is also at risk.
○No study has investigated the factors that characterise nursing degree programs, which attract even more applicants in a context of declining attractiveness.
What were the main findings? ○
Five magnetic factors have emerged, one of which is external and the others internal to the nursing program.
○The external factors relate to the program itself—and are embedded in the social, civic and academic environment of the host university and the city.
○The internal factors relate to the strong leadership and commitment of the nursing programme to promote its quality.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact on? ○
Findings may inform actions at the policy, university and individual nursing program levels.
COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative Research Checklist.
Data collection and validation involved citizens (students) attending the identified nursing programs.
To identify barriers and facilitators to nurse prescribing implementation through a synthesis of qualitative studies.
The roles of healthcare professionals are expanding in response to the growing demand for access to high-quality healthcare services. Advanced practice nurses are a global trend, and nurse prescribing is a crucial feature of advanced practice nurses that can meet the needs of growing healthcare services. The development and promotion of nurse prescribing varies significantly across countries, and it is essential to identify the factors influencing the implementation of nurse prescribing.
A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wan Fang and Weipu database was conducted to retrieve literature on barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of nurse prescribing. We searched records from inception to 29 March 2025. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, literature evaluation, data extraction and synthesis. Literature screening and data extraction adhered to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Literature quality was evaluated using the JBI Checklist for Qualitative Research. The results were synthesised using the thematic synthesis approach. Information was extracted using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in a deductive way, and barriers and facilitators to the implementation were categorised based on the CFIR. Report rigour assessed via ENTREQ.
The synthesis of 14 included papers identified 18 thematic categories, yielding two key findings. The main barriers identified included failure to anticipate the cost of nurse prescribing, legal constraints, social pressures, poor organisational structure, insufficient prescribing education, lack of competence of nurses leading to psychological changes, opposition and lack of cooperation of team members, and insufficient planning of nurse prescribing. Facilitating factors included prescribing experience, resource and labor conservation, cost reduction, resources, nurses' prescribing training, leadership support, patients' needs, nursing professional development, nurses' competence, and team cooperation and support.
Identifying barriers and facilitators to nurse prescribing is critical for informing policy-making and clinical prescribing practices. The results offers practical guidance to develop strategic plans that enhance implementation and adoption of nurse prescribing.
Nurse prescribing improves patient access while mitigating healthcare strain. By streamlining medication delivery and optimising resource use in overburdened systems, this model strengthens patient-centered care while allowing physician specialisation in complex cases. This workforce innovation enhances team-based care and ensures continuity for vulnerable populations.
This paper identifies barriers and facilitators, offering policymakers, healthcare administrators, and educators actionable insights to enable nurse role expansion, reduce physician workload, and enhance outcomes through holistic care.
No patient or public contribution.
To identify and address ethical challenges in doctoral supervision within nursing and health sciences and propose strategies to overcome them.
Following PRISMA guidelines, this mixed-method systematic review synthesises findings from quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies published in English between 2014 and 2025. Studies were included if they examined ethical challenges in doctoral supervision and strategies to address them within nursing and health sciences. Exclusion criteria encompassed reviews, books, editorials, opinion papers, conference papers, studies unrelated to nursing or health sciences or published before 2014.
A systematic search was conducted in CINAHL, Education Source, ERIC, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, yielding 1100 citations.
The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the STROBE checklist for quantitative studies and the COREQ framework for qualitative studies. The findings were then synthesised and thematically organised.
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria: four quantitative, four qualitative and three mixed methods. Ethical challenges in doctoral supervision emerged at three levels: individual (e.g., misaligned expectations, inadequate feedback, student adjustment difficulties), institutional (e.g., high student–supervisor ratios, limited support structures), and cultural (e.g., differing norms around autonomy and academic authority). Supervisors also reported role conflicts. Strategies to address these challenges included improved communication, supervision agreements, institutional support and targeted training.
Ethical challenges in supervision are shaped by individual, institutional and cultural factors. Addressing them requires multi-level strategies, including clear expectations, feedback mechanisms, structured training and culturally sensitive supervision practices. Applying ethical principles fosters a transparent and supportive academic environment that enhances doctoral outcomes.
Universities should adopt multi-level strategies, including supervisor training, mentorship structures and culturally informed policies, to strengthen the ethical integrity and effectiveness of doctoral supervision.
What problem did the study address?: This study synthesises ethical challenges in doctoral supervision within nursing and health sciences, focusing on communication barriers, institutional constraints and the transition from clinical practice to academia. What were the main Findings?: Misaligned expectations between supervisors and students, inadequate feedback and structural limitations, negatively impact the quality of supervision. Doctoral students struggle to adapt to academic expectations, while supervisors face challenges in balancing multiple roles. Effective communication, institutional support and targeted training programmes are essential for improving supervisory experience. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: The research will inform universities and institutions offering doctoral education in nursing and health sciences. It will benefit doctoral students, supervisors and academic administrators by providing insights and strategies to enhance supervision quality and promote ethical practices.
This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
No patient or public involvement.
The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of the use of baby-friendly community initiative (BFCI) model on various stakeholders in the community.
Quasi-experimental research design.
The study was conducted in public premises and online workshops from April 2019 to September 2022. Participants were followed up for a period of 1 month, except for those employed at public premises. The program involved training based on an accredited BFCI framework to cultivate a breastfeeding-friendly attitude and knowledge. A paired sample t-test was used to examine breastfeeding attitude and knowledge scores before and after BFCI training among staff employed from public premises. An analysis of variance was conducted to examine the breastfeeding self-efficacy and attitude scores, measured repeatedly at different timepoints over 1-month timepoint (T0, T1 and T2) among pregnant and postpartum women.
A total of 2340 perinatal women and 1339 staff from public premises were recruited. For staff, there was an increase in the mean score of breastfeeding knowledge and attitude by 5.8 and 6.1, respectively, at T1. Similarly, for perinatal women, there was an increase in the mean score of breastfeeding self-efficacy and attitude by 6.6 and 3.3, respectively, at T1.
In summary, a BFCI model, with active community participation, accreditation and an award system, has been effective in promoting breastfeeding. Adapting the baby-friendly hospital initiative to local contexts and employing a social theory model can enhance breastfeeding promotion and improve infant health outcomes. Prioritizing culturally sensitive breastfeeding education is crucial for successful BFCI implementation.
Healthcare professionals should consider clients' culture and socio-economic backgrounds when providing breastfeeding education to maximize effectiveness. The target audience for breastfeeding education should be expanded to include various community stakeholders beyond families.
What problem did the study address? This study addressed the problem of knowledge gaps among stakeholders in building a breastfeeding-friendly community, particularly in implementing a baby-friendly community initiative (BFCI) as part of a baby-friendly hospital initiative (BFHI). The research filled a service gap by providing effective interventions targeting community stakeholders and assessing the impact of a BFCI program on their knowledge and attitudes towards breastfeeding.
What were the main findings? The findings highlighted the effectiveness of a BFCI program in enhancing breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes among frontline staff and increasing breastfeeding confidence among mothers. These findings contribute to the understanding of the program's impact on different stakeholders in the community.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? It impacts on global policymakers by providing insights for developing comprehensive guidelines for future BFCI implementations. It also contributes to the creation of a more baby-friendly community, benefiting breastfeeding families and their infants by promoting and supporting breastfeeding families.
This study has adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines using the TREND reporting guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
This study provides an overview of the establishment of a localized BFCI program. It also opens up a new direction for the community to investigate BFCI strategies for community stakeholders. It also provides evidence to support other countries in following a similar process, as each country approaches becoming breastfeeding-friendly in its own unique way.
No protocol.
Chronic pruritus has a significant global impact, which is common in the elderly population. Developing a standardised and validated assessment tool is the basis for managing chronic pruritus. However, there is little research on standardised assessment tools for self-management in older people with chronic pruritus.
To construct and test the Self-management Scale for Chronic Pruritus in older people and provide a scientific and reliable tool to measure the self-management level of older people with chronic pruritus.
A three-phased exploratory sequential mixed-method design was used. In phase I, the initial construction of scale dimensions and items was conducted through literature review, semi-structured interviews and the Delphi method. In phase II, the scale was optimised, and the test version of the scale was formed. In phase III, we used the scale for practical evaluation. This research was conducted according to the STROBE guidelines.
Based on literature reviews and examination by experts, a draft scale was formulated. From October 2023 to December 2023, a total of 180 older people were recruited for item analysis and 206 older people were recruited for practical evaluation.
A total of 20 items were finally retained by the item analysis from the initial pool. In the exploratory factor analysis, the five-factor model explained 75.491% of the total variation, and the data fit was good. Based on multiple linear regression, the self-management level of older people with chronic pruritus was significantly correlated with gender, occupation, income, pruritus-related diagnosis, awareness of pruritus predisposing factors and receipt of pruritus treatment.
Self-management Scale for Chronic Pruritus in older people has good reliability and validity, providing a reference basis for healthcare professionals to assess the self-management levels of older people with chronic pruritus.
Healthcare professionals can use this scale to evaluate the self-management level of chronic pruritus in older people and explore the influencing factors, which can help develop targeted health education programmes.
Experts provided suggestions for developing the scale. Older people with chronic pruritus participated in the scale revision process to improve wording.
To explore the possible barriers and facilitators to implementing the Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour (UPSSL) programme in Chinese healthcare settings.
A mixed-method convergent design with the guidance of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
An online survey study and semi-structured interviews were conducted between March and May 2023. Healthcare professionals were recruited from four hospitals in Shijiazhuang, China. One hundred and thirty-one participants completed the survey study, and 23 of them were interviewed individually. Descriptive statistics evaluated the possible barriers and facilitators of implementing the UPSSL programme within the CFIR framework quantitatively. Guided by the CFIR framework, qualitative data were analysed using directed content analysis to summarize healthcare professionals' perspectives on barriers and facilitators of the UPSSL programme.
Multiple intersectional barriers and facilitators were identified from the survey and semi-interviews. Healthcare professionals believed that the UPSSL programme has a scientific evidence base, systematic contents, and possible benefits for women. However, various barriers existed at individual, system, and organizational levels. Major barriers included healthcare professionals and women's safety concerns towards the use of upright positions during childbirth, the healthcare professionals' unfamiliarity with assisting an upright position birth, poor adaptability of the programme protocol, inadequate facilities and staffing, and a lack of readiness to change in the clinical setting.
To facilitate the implementation of the UPSSL programme in China, tailored antenatal education on upright positions, especially addressing safety-related issues, should be provided to pregnant women, their families, or peers to enhance their understanding of and familiarity with such positions. Healthcare professionals should also be offered adequate training opportunities and necessary facilities. Furthermore, national-level policy changes might be required to address midwifery workforce shortages. Additionally, further research is warranted to select, adapt, and test effective implementation strategies for programme adoption.
What problem did the study address? The adoption of upright positions during the second stage of labour could promote better maternal and neonatal outcomes and a positive childbirth experience. However, the adoption of upright positions during the second stage of labour is suboptimal in healthcare settings in China. Barriers and facilitators of implementing upright positions during childbirth are unclear. What were the main findings? A range of barriers and facilitators within the CFIR framework to promote upright positions during childbirth from healthcare professionals' perspectives were identified, and the major barriers included safety concerns towards and unfamiliarity with an upright position birth, inadequate facilities and staffing, and a lack of readiness to change in the clinical setting. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study will enable a better understanding of the barriers and facilitators to promoting upright positions in the second stage of labour in China. The smooth and effective implementation of the UPSSL programme could help to promote better maternal and neonatal outcomes and improve women's childbirth experiences.
The reporting of this study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) and Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines.
In this study, healthcare professionals were involved in refining the topic guides and survey questions. Additionally, findings from the interviews were returned to them for comments and corrections.
In China, more than 30% of patients have not initiated treatment within 30 days of HIV diagnosis. Delayed initiation has a detrimental influence on disease outcomes and increases HIV transmission. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led antiretroviral therapy initiation nudging intervention for people newly diagnosed with HIV in China to find the optimal intervention implementation strategy.
A Hybrid Type II sequential multiple assignment randomized trial will be conducted at four Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Hunan, China. This study will recruit 447 people newly diagnosed with HIV aged ≥18 years and randomly assign them into two intervention groups and one control group. On top of the regular counselling services and referrals, intervention groups will receive a 4-week, 2-phase intervention based on the dual-system theory and the nudge theory. The control group will follow the currently recommended referral procedures. The primary outcomes are whether treatment is initiated, as well as the length of time it takes. The study outcomes will be measured at the baseline, day 15, day 30, week 12, week 24 and week 48. Generalized estimating equations and survival analysis will be used to compare effectiveness and explore factors associated with antiretroviral therapy initiation. Both qualitative and quantitative information will be collected to assess implementation outcomes.
Existing strategies mostly target institutional-level factors, with little consideration given to patients' decision-making. To close this gap, we aim to develop an effective theory-driven nudging strategy to improve early ART initiation.
This nurse-led study will help to prevent delayed initiation by employing implementation science strategies for people newly diagnosed with HIV. This study contributes to the United Nations' objective of ending the AIDS pandemic by 2030.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300070140. The trial was prospectively registered before the first participant was recruited.
The nudging intervention was finalized through the Nominal Group Technique where we invited five experts in the related field and five people living with HIV to participate.
To identify factors influencing hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergoing colonoscopy and to construct a predictive model for assessing hypoglycaemia risk.
A retrospective cohort study.
We retrospectively collected data on 598 T2DM patients who underwent colonoscopy and randomised them into a developmental cohort and a validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. We used multivariate logistic regression to develop a predictive model for hypoglycaemia during colonoscopy and identify independent predictors in pre- and post-colonoscopy hypoglycaemia groups.
We identified 112 of 598 (18.7%) T2DM patients who experienced hypoglycaemia during the peri-colonoscopy period: 43 pre-colonoscopy, 61 post-colonoscopy and 8 at both junctures. Ultimately, five predictors—insulin, SGLT2 inhibitors, fasting after colonoscopy, fasting C-peptide and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)—were integrated into the predictive model. The AUC for predicting hypoglycaemia was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71–0.84) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74–0.90) in the development and validation cohort, respectively. Variables associated with pre-colonoscopy hypoglycaemia included SGLT2 inhibitors, fasting C-peptide and eGFR, whereas the post-colonoscopy hypoglycaemia group was associated with metformin, duration of diabetes, fasting C-peptide and fasting after the examination.
This study successfully developed and validated a predictive model for assessing hypoglycaemia risk in T2DM patients during peri-colonoscopy.
Early identification of patients at high risk for peri-colonoscopy hypoglycaemia allows nurses to implement personalised preventive strategies. The predictive model enables clinical nurses to deliver tailored interventions based on individual risk factors, potentially reducing hypoglycaemia-related complications and improving patient safety outcomes.
This study provides nurses with a validated risk prediction tool for identifying high-risk type 2 diabetes patients during colonoscopy, enabling targeted blood glucose monitoring protocols and preventive interventions in clinical practice.
This study follows the STROBE guidelines for reporting cohort studies.
Diabetes patients contributed electronic health record datasets.
The aim of the study was to develop a set of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for accelerating spine surgical rehabilitation.
This is a modified Delphi study. A two-round Delphi study was conducted from November to December 2023.
Based on an evidence-based perspective and semi-structured interviews, an outline of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for accelerated rehabilitation in spine surgery patients was formulated. The Donabedian structure-process-outcome theory model was used as the theoretical framework to develop the indicator system; the indicators were improved and refined after two rounds of Delphi surveys, and the weights of the indicators were determined by the analytic hierarchy process. A total of 23 experts from 10 hospitals in 7 Chinese provinces completed the two rounds of the modified Delphi process.
The experts reached a consensus on the definition of the indicators, the calculation formula and the data collection method, and included a sensitive quality indicator system for accelerated rehabilitation care in spine surgery with 3 primary indicators, 9 secondary indicators and 26 tertiary indicators.
A set of indicators about accelerated rehabilitation care in spinal surgery covers the key aspects of patient education, assessment, measures, and rehabilitation, and its content is scientific, comprehensive, and targeted, which can provide a basis for objective evaluation of the quality of accelerated rehabilitation care in spinal surgery.
Medical institutions can routinely collect monthly data based on this indicator, conduct horizontal comparisons of the quality of accelerated rehabilitation care in spinal surgery among hospitals at the same level with the assistance of a national or even global networked auditing platform, and establish an internal safeguard mechanism for evaluating the quality of perioperative care.
This study follows the Conducting and REporting of DElphi studies (CREDE) guidance on Delphi studies.
No patient or public contribution was made in this study.
To develop precision health (PH) competencies and evaluate their comprehensiveness and fit into nursing practice.
A modified e-Delphi technique was used to gather perceptions and achieve consensus on the inaugural set of PH domains, competency statements and sub-competencies developed by a workgroup formed under the aegis of the American Nurses Association (ANA).
A set of PH competencies and sub-competencies was developed by the ANA workgroup, beginning with a literature review, followed by a multi-step work process of the group over 3 years (2022–2025). Then, a modified e-Delphi technique was conducted via a four-point Likert scale Qualtrics survey, using a purposive sample of PH experts. The respondents were asked to agree or disagree with each competency or sub-competency statement and suggest modifications. The threshold of concordance was set at 80%.
The ANA workgroup reached consensus on six domains, six competency statements and 43 sub-competency statements to represent PH in nursing practice in its entirety. Forty experts in the field evaluated and offered revisions to the final 44 sub-competencies that represent the knowledge and skills necessary for PH in general nursing practice. A majority of the competency statements obtained favourable agreement from the expert panel, and a typical pattern of convergence was observed over two rounds of evaluation.
The development of PH competencies is the essential first step in the attempt to integrate PH into nursing practice.
The competency statements will inform nursing curricula, clinical practice guidelines, funding opportunities and role expectations in all healthcare settings.
This work sets the stage for subsequent interprofessional practice initiatives and research exploring how these competencies influence patient outcomes, workforce readiness and the practical integration of advanced technologies into precise care.
To develop the Preschool Children eHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation programme based on the Interaction Model of Client Health Behaviour, and to evaluate its effects on children after congenital heart surgery.
A parallel two-arm randomised controlled trial was conducted.
A total of 84 participants were recruited from July 2022 to June 2023 and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 40) or control group (n = 44). The intervention group participated in a 3-month eHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation programme, while the control group received routine care. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 months post baseline (intervention endpoint), and 6 months post baseline. Eighty participants completed the study.
Compared to the intervention group, the control group demonstrated significantly worse outcomes at both 3 and 6 months, including a higher risk of heart failure, lower left ventricular ejection fraction scores, and shorter 6-min walk distance tests. The intervention group engaged in significantly more vigorous physical activity. Significant between group differences were also observed in parental knowledge, attitudes, behaviours and trust levels. Additionally, the proportion of parents experiencing anxiety decreased significantly more in the intervention group by 6 months post baseline.
This pioneering eHealth programme transforms home-based rehabilitation for preschool children with congenital heart disease, addressing a critical gap in accessible and long-term paediatric cardiac rehabilitation care.
The use of eHealth programmes is valuable for improving paediatric cardiac rehabilitation by empowering parents, enhancing care continuity, and reducing barriers to accessing specialised services in paediatric care, especially in areas with limited medical resources.
This study establishes the first validated eHealth framework for family-centred cardiac rehabilitation in preschool children following congenital heart surgery, addressing the critically low uptake of previously home-based rehabilitation. It also provides clinicians with a scalable solution for delivering care in underserved regions lacking access to specialised cardiac services.
This study adhered to the CONSORT checklist guidelines for reporting randomised controlled trials.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This study was a randomised controlled clinical trial. The research protocol was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (registration number: ChiCTR2200062022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=174261).
FreshRSS 