FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Poor adjustment to nursing homes and 1-year mortality: a secondary analysis of the KASEHPAD cohort study

Por: Boucaud-Maitre · D. · Amieva · H. · Pic · O. · Letchimy · L. · Simo · N. · Dartigues · J.-F. · Drame · M. · Dorey · J.-M. · Tabue-Teguo · M. — Diciembre 4th 2025 at 09:48
Objectives

Older adults transitioning to nursing homes face challenges in adapting to a new environment and imposed lifestyle changes. This study aimed to identify factors associated with poor nursing home adjustment and to assess their impact on 1-year mortality.

Design and settings

This study is a secondary analysis of the KArukera Study of Ageing in ‘Établissement d'Hébergement pour Personnes Agées Dépendantes’ (EHPAD) (KASEHPAD) cohort, a prospective observational study conducted over 1 year in six nursing homes in the French Caribbean.

Participants

159 older adults (aged 60 years or older) living in nursing homes who were able to complete the self-administered adaptation scale.

Main outcome measures

Nursing home adjustment was assessed at baseline using the adaptation scale for older adults to their residence (EAPAR). Bivariate analysis was used to assess associations between adjustment status and sociodemographic or clinical characteristics at baseline. Poisson regressions were used to assess the relationship between 1-year mortality and adjustment status.

Results

A total of 159 older adults (mean age: 79.6 years; male/female ratio: 84/75) were included. The mean length of stay was 4.1 years. Among older adults, 78 (49.1%) were classified as poorly adapted. Age, gender, education level, dependency, cognition and comorbidities were not significantly associated with poor adjustment. In contrast, depressive symptoms, lower social support, lower health-related quality of life, lower subjective quality of life, malnutrition and sleep disturbances were associated with poor adjustment. After 12 months, 14 deaths (17.9%) occurred in the poor adjustment group, compared with 4 (4.9%) in the no major adjustment difficulties group (adjusted relative risk for age, gender and baseline activities of daily living score=4.64 (95% CI 1.53 to 17.5; p=0011).

Conclusions

In a sample of older adults with moderate cognitive impairment, poor adjustment to nursing home was associated with depressive symptomatology and increased 1-year mortality. The issue of adjustment in nursing homes represents an emerging research area that warrants further investigation through dedicated interventional studies.

Trial registration number

NCT04587466.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Impact of intraoperatiVe moderAte positive end-expiratory pressure with reCruitment mAnoeuvres versus low positive end-expiRatory pressure on major postoperative pulMonary complications and death after on-pump cardiac surgery in high-risk patients: the VA

Por: Demaure · N. · Le Cunff · J. · Duchene · M. · Rozec · B. · Espitalier · F. · Cabon · J.-M. · Oilleau · J.-F. · Guerci · P. · Labaste · F. · Abou-Arab · O. · Guinot · P.-G. · Duval · P. · Besnier · E. · Flecher · E. · Leroyer · I. · Morcet · J. · Fougerou-Leurent · C. · Mansour · A. · Nesse — Octubre 29th 2025 at 16:48
Introduction

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common after cardiac surgery and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung-protective ventilation strategies have been proposed to reduce PPCs, but the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the use of alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) remain controversial.

Methods/analysis

In this investigator-initiated, multicentre, open, randomised, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial, elective cardiac surgery patients at risk of PPCs will be assigned to one of two intraoperative ventilation strategies: (1) an open-lung ventilation strategy with protective ventilation, moderate PEEP and RMs or (2) a standard protective ventilation with low PEEP and no RM. The primary outcome will be a composite of prolonged (>24 hour) postoperative mechanical ventilation, reintubation for any cause or hospital-acquired pneumonia within 7 days of surgery, or death within 28 days of surgery. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Ethics and dissemination

The VACARM (impact of intraoperatiVe moderAte positive end-expiratory pressure with reCruitment mAnoeuvres versus low positive end-expiRatory pressure on major postoperative pulMonary complications and death after on-pump cardiac surgery in high-risk patients) trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Recruitment began in July 2021. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04408495.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Milrinone infusion for vasospasm treatment in subarachnoid haemorrhage: protocol for a double-blind randomised clinical trial - the MiVAR study

Por: Lasocki · S. · Lakhal · K. · de Courson · H. · Geslain · M. · Launey · Y. · Pottecher · J. · Trouiller · P. · Laffon · M. · Gakuba · C. · Parot-Schinkel · E. · Hamel · J.-F. · Campfort · M. · Gaillard · T. · on behalf of the MiVAR study group · the ATLANREA group · the SFAR researc — Octubre 28th 2025 at 18:00
Introduction

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is relatively frequent, accounting for 5% of strokes and affects a young population. Arterial vasospasm is a frequent complication of SAH, with an estimated incidence as high as 70%. Vasospasm is responsible for cerebral ischaemia which in turn is potentially responsible for severe morbidity (neurological deficit, neuropsychiatric disorders), poor quality of life (institutionalisation, inability to return to work) and increased mortality. Treatment with intravenous milrinone, an arterial vasodilator, has been proposed, but no randomised controlled study exists. We hypothesised that an intravenous infusion of milrinone would improve the neurological recovery of patients with vasospasm following aneurysmal SAH at 3 months.

Methods and analysis

The MiVAR (Milrinone Infusion for VAsospam treatment in subarachnoid hemoRrhage) study is an investigator-initiated, phase III multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled, double-blinded, superiority trial evaluating the effect of intravenous milrinone versus placebo (saline), in patients with cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal SAH. Patients will be included within 6 hours of the confirmation of vasospasm diagnosis by a CT angiography and randomised to receive either milrinone (initial bolus of 0.1 mg/kg over 30 min—max 10 mg—followed by a continuous infusion at 1 µg/kg/min rate for at least 48 hours) or placebo. Milrinone (or placebo) could be increased to 1.5 µg/kg/min. The dose is adapted according to the clinical and/or transcranial Doppler response. 360 patients are expected to be included. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a good neurological outcome at 3 months, defined as a modified Rankin score ≤2, obtained through a centralised standardised telephone interview (done by a unique trained team). The study started in August 2020, and the expected final follow-up is the last quarter of 2025. Analyses of the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations are planned.

Ethics and dissemination

The MiVAR trial protocol has been approved by an ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ouest V), by the Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament (ANSM, Number 160 828A-21, approval date 26 December 2019) and by the ‘Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté’ (CNIL, decision DR-2020-076, approval date 21 February 2020). The study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. The MiVAR study will be the first multicentre randomised study to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous milrinone in improving the neurological outcomes at 3 months in patients with vasospasm following aneurysmal SAH.

Trial registration numbers

NCT04362527, EudractCT number 2019-002145-37.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Acupuncture for preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Por: Li · B.-Y. · Liu · C.-Z. · Zhou · H. · Wei · X.-Y. · Jia · J.-Y. · Wang · J. · Guo · X.-Y. · Liang · W. · Tu · J.-F. · Wang · L.-Q. · Shi · G. · Yang · J.-W. · Yang · N.-N. — Julio 29th 2025 at 06:15
Introduction

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most prevalent non-haematological, dose-limiting adverse event associated with platinum derivatives and taxanes. Currently, no effective prophylactic interventions for CIPN have been established. However, several studies have shown that acupuncture may alleviate symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, proposing it as a potentially effective strategy for CIPN prevention. This pilot trial will help determine the feasibility and efficacy of acupuncture for preventing CIPN. The results will provide valuable insights for designing a larger clinical trial and conducting power calculations.

Methods and analysis

This is a randomised sham-controlled trial. A cohort of 60 patients scheduled to receive chemotherapy will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either the electroacupuncture group or the sham acupuncture group. Eligible patients will receive nine treatment sessions administered over the course of three chemotherapy cycles. The primary outcome is the change in CIPN-related quality of life (QOL) measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) CIPN20 from baseline to the end of cycle three. Secondary outcomes include: neurotoxicity symptoms assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale, incidence of CIPN, chemotherapy status, insomnia symptoms measured by the Insomnia Severity Index, depression symptoms evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, anxiety symptoms assessed with the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and fatigue symptoms measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Adverse events will be meticulously recorded.

Ethics and dissemination

The study protocol (V.1.0, 29 July 2024) has been approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (2024-KY-0853–001). All patients will provide oral informed consent and written informed consent before participating in this study. Trial results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number

ITMCTR2024000390 (International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry, http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/zh-CN/Home/ProjectView?pid=16387992-8971-4218-9cd0-b623af91f9f3), registered on 3 September 2024.

❌