FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Effects of a digital tool implementing the German S3 clinical practice guideline for multimorbidity in primary care (gp-multitool.de): study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Por: Schäfer · I. · Menzel · A. · Lezius · S. · Krause · L. · Zapf · A. · Lühmann · D. · Scherer · M. · Paucke · V. · Nothacker · J. — Agosto 3rd 2025 at 14:44
Introduction

Multimorbidity is prevalent and associated with complex treatment requirements. In order to assist general practitioners (GPs) addressing these requirements, the web application gp-multitool.de has been designed, which facilitates implementation of the German clinical practice guideline for multimorbidity. We will conduct a cluster-randomised clinical trial evaluating an intervention based on this tool. This protocol summarises methods and discusses ethics and dissemination of this study.

Methods and analysis

Participating patients are recruited by cooperating GP practices. Inclusion criteria are an age of 65 years or older, enrolment in any disease management programme and multimorbidity operationalised by two additional chronic conditions. To avoid postrandomisation selection bias, practices are randomised as clusters after baseline assessment of all participating patients from the respective practice. In our intervention, patients receive access to different assessments including patient preferences by email, fill out the electronic assessment forms on any device with access to the internet, receive a medication review and discuss the assessment results with their GPs. GPs in the control group do not have access to the digital tool and provide care as usual. The primary outcome is staying at least once for at least one night in hospital during the 12-month observation period. Secondary outcomes are contacts with GPs and outpatient specialists, self-reported health, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction and GP-reported and patient-reported quality of care. A sample size of 660 patients from 66 GP practices is needed. Data are analysed by mixed effects regression models.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics approval was obtained by the ethics committee of the Medical Association of Hamburg (2022–1 00 786-BO-ff). Study results will be presented on scientific conferences and published in journal articles. In addition, healthcare professionals, patient representatives and the interested public will be informed about study results at a symposium.

Trial registration number

The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06831994).

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Modified Alliance-Focused Training with Doubling as an integrative approach to improve therapists competencies in dealing with alliance ruptures and prevent negative outcomes in psychotherapy for depression: study protocol of a randomised controlled multi

Por: Gumz · A. · Kästner · D. · Reuter · L. · Martinez Moura · C. · Ehlers · K. · Daubmann · A. · Eubanks · C. F. · Muran · J. C. · Anderson · T. · Stöckl · R. · Schwanitz · G. · Stegemann · L. · Rohr · L. · Willutzki · U. · Jacobi · F. · Zapf · A. — Julio 16th 2025 at 09:42
Introduction

Alliance ruptures constitute a high risk of premature treatment termination and poor psychotherapy outcome. The Alliance-Focused Training (AFT) is a promising transtheoretical approach to enhance therapists’ skills in dealing with alliance ruptures.

Methods and analysis

To evaluate the effectiveness of Modified AFT with doubling (MAFT-D), a randomised, patient and evaluator-blinded, multicentre trial was designed comparing MAFT-D (delivered to trainee therapists and supervisors) and psychotherapy training/treatment as usual (TAU) for therapists (n=120) and their patients with depressive disorders (n=240). A total of 17 cooperating centres, each offering either cognitive-behavioural or psychodynamic psychotherapy training, will contribute to recruitment. Stratification by centre (both for therapists and patients) and hence therapeutic approach (cognitive-behavioural vs psychodynamic psychotherapies), and by comorbid personality disorder (yes vs no, for patients) will be carried out. The two hierarchically ordered primary hypotheses are: In MAFT-D compared with TAU, a stronger reduction of depressive symptoms and a lower rate of patient dropout is expected from baseline to 20 weeks after baseline. Follow-up assessments are planned at 35 weeks, 20 months and 36 months postbaseline to evaluate the persistence of effects. Secondary patient-related and therapist-related outcomes as well as predictors, moderators and mediators of change will be investigated. Mixed models with repeated measures will be used for the primary analyses.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approvals were obtained by the institutional ethics review board of the main study centre as well as by review boards in each federal state where one or more cooperating centres are located (secondary votes). Following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials, results will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.

Trial registration number

DRKS00014842; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00014842.

☐ ☆ ✇ Journal of Clinical Nursing

Implementation of an external female urinary catheter strategy on prevention of skin breakdown in acute care: A quality improvement study

Abstract

Aim(s)

To evaluate the incidence of skin-related complications attributable to incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) using an external female urinary catheter device strategy for urinary incontinent (UI) patients in acute care.

Design

Multicenter quality improvement study.

Methods

Randomized allocation of two commercially available external female urinary catheter devices was used in hospitalized UI female patients. Daily nursing skin assessments were documented in the electronic health record before, during and after external catheter device application. Methods and results were reported following SQUIRE guidelines.

Results

Three hundred and eighty-one patients from 57 inpatient care units were included in the analysis. Both catheter devices were associated with an overall low risk (5 %) of new or worsening skin breakdown.

Conclusion

The overall benefit of external catheters is most persuasive for skin integrity, rather than infection prevention.

Impact

Significant negative outcomes are associated with UI patients. External female urinary catheters are a non-invasive alternative strategy to reduce exposure of regional skin to urine contamination and IAD-related skin complications. Use of external female urinary catheters in hospitalized UI female patients offers low risk (5%) of new or worsening overall skin breakdown.

Patient Contribution

Hospitalized UI female patients were screened for external catheter device eligibility by the bedside nurse. The quality improvement review committee waved consent because the intervention was considered standard care.

❌