Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic and severe psychiatric condition defined by a level of opioid use which significantly impairs interpersonal and social functioning. In the biopsychosocial model of addiction, research has shown that psychiatric, sociological and neurobiological factors individually affect OUD severity. However, how these factors interact in the determination of OUD severity remains poorly understood.

The Epigenetic Bonds of Opioid Use Profiles are a multidisciplinary project whose primary objective is to characterise psychiatric and social factors of OUD in a large cohort of patients. The secondary objectives are, first, to correlate psychosocial severity with blood-derived epigenetic biomarkers to provide a deeper understanding of determinants of OUD and, second, to examine over a 2 year follow-up the correlation between the evolution of OUD and psychosocial severity with epigenetic biomarkers at inclusion. An additional objective is to analyse the impact of drug consumption rooms on access to care for most severely affected patients with OUD. In total, 300 opioid users will be recruited at supervised injection sites in Strasbourg and Paris and at addiction care centres in Strasbourg and Lyon to explore four psychiatric (substance use disorders beyond opioids, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder) and five social (social support and status, traumatic experiences, housing, imprisonment, access to care) factors. Opioid users will be followed for 24 months and reassessed for psychosocial factors at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Opioid consumption will be measured in all subjects using questionnaires, complemented by toxicological screenings (mass spectrometry). Finally, DNA methylation and gene expression will be characterised in capillary blood using next-generation sequencing. Mixed models will be used to model the primary and secondary outcomes.

This ongoing study was approved by the French Ethics Committee ‘Sud Méditerranée III’ of University Hospital of Nîmes (approval 2023–2024, protocol IDRCB number 2022-A02477-36) and authorised by the French Data Protection Authority (authorisation decision DR-2023–277 in December 2023). Results will be presented in international and national conferences and published in peer-reviewed international journals.

NCT06021548.

This study aimed to examine how older adults form beliefs about their memory and how these beliefs are influenced by their level of concern about dementia. Inaccurate beliefs and excessive worrying, indicative of erroneous metacognition, are associated with negative health outcomes. This research can help identify mitigation for these harmful effects.

Qualitative focus groups; thematic analysis.

Focus group discussion with healthy older adults hosted at a university in central London.

35 healthy older individuals (women=29) without any psychiatric or neurological diagnoses, over the age of 65 years (mean 75.31, SD: 6.15). 13 participants were identified as having a high level of worry about dementia and 22 as having low worry. Groups were matched for cognitive performance on the Telephone Mini Addenbrooke’s cognitive assessment (Tele-MACE).

Participants were assigned to a focus group depending on their level of worry about dementia. During focus groups, a vignette prompted discussion around lifespan changes in memory and how this affected concerns around memory. This allowed investigation of the differences in beliefs about memory.

Thematic analysis revealed two key themes. First, older adults appear to base their definition of ‘normality’ of their own memory on comparisons. These comparisons were between themselves and others and between themselves now and their own past self. Despite similar strategies to define ‘normality’, those with high dementia worry had stricter definitions of what they determined as normal. The second theme described narratives around the ‘self’ and the ‘other’. There was a difference between those with high versus low worry; those with high worry had a strong focus on the ‘self’, while those with low dementia worry focused on ‘others’.

Comparison is a common metacognitive strategy used in forming beliefs about memory. Targeting the use of comparison is potentially valuable in interventions aiming to alleviate older adults’ memory concerns. Addressing self-focused thinking, for example, with cognitive behavioural therapy, could improve harmful levels of high worry.

Digital inclusion (which includes skills, accessibility and connectivity to the internet and digital devices) is a ‘super social determinant of health’ because it affects many aspects of life that influence health. Older people are especially vulnerable to digital exclusion. Existing digital inclusion interventions are commonly offered opportunistically to people who come into contact with services, or in specific locations. The lack of systematic identification of need unintentionally excludes older people who may be most in need of support, and that support is not addressing their needs.

This multi-method project includes six workstreams: (1) A survey of people aged 65+ to ask about digital use and engagement. Survey data will be used to develop a model that predicts digital exclusion from data available in primary care records. (2) Testing, via a further survey, the external validity of the model to identify those who are digitally excluded. (3) Interviews with community service providers to identify, understand and define the components of existing digital inclusion services for older people. Concurrently, a rapid review of the literature will identify evidence for interventions aimed at supporting digitally excluded adults aged 65+. (4) Interviews with people aged 65+ representing a range of digital use will explore factors from the COM-B model that influence digital behaviours—their capability (C), opportunity (O) and motivation (M) relating to digital engagement. Analysis outputs will identify the intersectional nature of barriers or facilitators to digital inclusion. (5) Co-production workshops with older people and community service providers will identify key components of interventions that are required to address digital exclusion. Components will be mapped against existing interventions, and the ‘best fit’ intervention(s) refined. An implementation plan will be developed in parallel. (6) Feasibility testing of the refined intervention(s) to assess acceptability and obtain feedback on content and delivery mechanisms.

This study was approved by the Yorkshire & The Humber - Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee on 23 October 2023 (ref. 23/YH/0234). Findings will be disseminated in academic journals and shared at webinars, seminars, conferences and events arranged by organisations operating across the digital inclusion and older people fields.

https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18306736

This study explored the knowledge and awareness of Dutch patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and healthcare insurers on the climate impact of inhalers as well as (factors influencing) their attitude towards climate-friendly inhaler prescription.

We recruited participants for this qualitative study with purposive sampling. We conducted four online focus groups with patients, six with HCPs and two interviews with healthcare insurer representatives. Determinants were analysed with the Framework Approach.

21 patients, 27 HCPs and two healthcare insurer representatives.

Knowledge and awareness on the climate impact of inhalers varied and was generally lower among patients and healthcare insurers than among HCPs. The attitude towards climate-friendly inhaler prescription was variable among patients and mainly positive among HCPs. Both patients and HCPs assigned a greater role to HCPs than to patients in considering climate impact and agreed that patients’ interest must remain paramount. Factors influencing implementation were mainly related to outcome expectancies, such as expected effect on freedom of choice, expected response of patients and expected effect on patients’ health. The latter is partly influenced by beliefs about different types of inhalers. HCPs expressed a need for information and training on the topic and for collaboration with other stakeholders in the field of pulmonary care. Healthcare insurers assign themselves a role in a more climate-friendly healthcare but are reluctant to direct the preference policy on climate impact.

Both patients and HCPs feel climate-friendly inhaler prescription is important. Implementation can be promoted by enhancing awareness and providing HCPs with information on inhaler climate impact, how to safely practice climate-friendly prescription and how to inform patients about its benefits. Both patients and HCPs emphasise the significance of preserving freedom of choice in prescription and highlight the need for a consensus approach on climate-friendly prescribing endorsed by all pulmonary care stakeholders.