Conectar
by Ariene Silva do Carmo, Paulo César Pereira de Castro Júnior, Thais Cristina Marquezine Caldeira, Daniela Silva Canella, Rafael Moreira Claro, Luiza Delazari Borges, Larissa Loures Mendes
The present study analyzed the prices of food sold in canteens of Brazilian private schools and described price-based marketing strategies, according to the NOVA food classification system. This is a mixed methods study combining a cross-sectional component and time series analysis, with data from 2,241 canteens in private elementary and secondary schools in the 26 capitals of Brazil and the Federal District, collected between June 2022 and June 2024. Price data collected for unprocessed, minimally processed, or processed foods and culinary preparations based on these foods (UMPCP), and ultra-processed foods and culinary preparations based on these foods (UpCP) sold in school canteens and from the National System of Consumer Price Indices (SNIPC), were used to create a data set containing deflated monthly prices for food and beverages sold between August 2022 and July 2024. Calculations were made for adjusted prices (R$/100 g or ml) and absolute prices (R$ per portion), and frequency of use of strategies such as combos and promotions. UMPCP showed lower adjusted price, but higher absolute price than UpCP, especially for solid foods. About 27% of the study canteens implemented pricing strategies for both food groups. Most of these strategies did not exclusively favor healthy foods, indicating that promotions and combos were used without distinction. The affordability of healthy foods is disadvantaged in school canteens when considering the price per portion, which may negatively influence students’ food choices. The findings show that current prices for food sold in most canteens discourage the purchase of healthy items, but favor the purchase of unhealthy ones. These results reinforce the importance of interventions for promoting healthy foods and making them more affordable.
To evaluate the predictive capacity of the Integrated Care for Older People screening tool for the risk of falls in older people receiving care at a healthcare service.
A cross-sectional study.
This study was conducted in a geriatric healthcare service in the southeast region of Brazil. The convenience sample included older people aged 60 and over living at home. The study used the Fall Risk Score to assess the risk of falls and the Integrated Care for Older People screening tool to track intrinsic capacity. The data was analysed using logistic regression to analyse the association between the six Intrinsic Capacity domains, for the early detection of impairment and risk of falls.
A total of 253 older adults participated in the study, most of whom were identified as having a high risk of falls. Logistic regression analysis across six association models revealed that the models including the Intrinsic Capacity domains of locomotion and hearing had a significant association with having a higher risk of falls. Care plans should prioritise the domains most strongly associated with fall risk, guiding targeted strategies to enhance older adults' safety.
The Integrated Care for Older People screening tool, in the locomotion and hearing domains, is associated with the risk of falls in older people from the community receiving care in a geriatric healthcare service. Future longitudinal studies could show whether other domains of intrinsic capacity can predict the occurrence of falls.
This study highlights the Integrated Care for Older People screening tool as essential in nursing practice, especially for assessing the locomotion and hearing domains of intrinsic capacity. Early detection of impairments helps identify increased fall risk in older adults, enabling nurses to implement targeted, person-centred interventions that enhance safety, autonomy and overall quality of life.
No patient or public contribution.
This study complied with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for cross-sectional studies.
The COVID-19 pandemic’s unprecedented nature has exposed significant vulnerabilities in most public health systems and highlighted the importance of coordinated responses across various levels of government. A global debate emerged on the types of health measures necessary to curb the rapid spread of contagious and/or lethal diseases. However, some of these measures involved restricting individual rights, raising significant ethical, legal and public health questions. The protocol of this systematic review aims to address a critical gap in the literature by analysing how Public Health Surveillance services worldwide implemented compulsory right-restricting measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, and what impacts these measures had on public health outcomes and individual rights.
This protocol focuses on studies about right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will be unrestrictive as to period (starting in 2019, when the outbreak was identified), language or publication status in a preliminary stage. It will include only peer-reviewed publications, discarding opinion articles, editorials, conference papers and non-peer-reviewed publications. Considering the PICo strategy, the research question of this systematic review can be formulated as follows: Problem—right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services; Interest—implementation modalities and impacts on individual rights and public health outcomes; Context—COVID-19 pandemic. This protocol will use the following databases: Pubmed, Cochrane/CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Considering the various measures that may have been adopted, the following categories of analysis will be used: (i) Public Health Surveillance as a field, (ii) the various specific areas of Health Surveillance, (iii) law enforcement, (iv) right-restricting measures and consent, (v) interactions between right-restricting measures and routine Public Health Surveillance functions, (vi) differences between countries and (vii) Health Surveillance lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic. These categories are not strictly mutually exclusive; however, each study will be assigned to the category most aligned with its primary focus. To ensure the validity and reliability of findings, each study will have its risk of bias assessed at both the study and outcome levels.
Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this systematic review. The results will be presented in one or more articles to be submitted to scientific journals and may also be presented at scientific conferences and to public policy makers.
This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 20 November 2024 (registration number CRD42024613039).
Objetivo: recopilar evidencia científica sobre la implementación y evaluación del uso de instrumentos para la identificación temprana del deterioro clínico en pacientes no infectados por SARS-COV-2 en unidades de hospitalización de adultos. Método: revisión integradora realizada en las bases de datos Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Web Of Science y SCOPUS, utilizando la siguiente estrategia de búsqueda: (“Early Medical Intervention” OR “Early Warning Systems” O “Puntuación de alerta temprana”) Y (“Deterioro clínico”). Resultados: se seleccionaron ocho artículos que abordaron la implementación de herramientas para la identificación temprana de deterioro clínico en unidades de hospitalización y evaluaron sus resultados a través de indicadores de incidencia de paro cardiorrespiratorio, incidencia de ingreso no planificado en UTI, incidencia de cirugía de emergencia, mortalidad e incidencia de enfermedad renal. lesión. Conclusión: la implementación de herramientas que permiten la identificación temprana del deterioro clínico en las unidades de hospitalización tuvo un impacto positivo en los indicadores institucionales.
Objetivo: Identificar os efeitos da pandemia da COVID 19 nos profissionais atuantes no atendimento pré-hospitalar. Método: revisão integrativa, conduzida de acordo com o protocolo prisma, por meio das bases de dados: Medline/PubMed, Lilacs, SciElo, BDENF, CUIDEN, CINAHAL. Adotaram-se os Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DeCS): “Saúde do trabalhador” “Pandemia” “COVID 19” “Atendimento pré-hospitalar” “Segurança” “Profissionais de saúde” “Trabalho”. Após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão, foram selecionados treze artigos que compuseram a amostra do estudo. Resultados: dezoito artigos foram analisados e duas categorias foram construídas: risco de contaminação e exposição ocupacional dos profissionais da saúde que cuidam de pacientes acometidos pela COVID-19 e risco de adoecimento psicoemocional dos profissionais da saúde que cuidam pacientes acometidos pela COVID-19. Conclusão: A revisão mostrou os potenciais efeitos sobre a saúde dos profissionais durante o atendimento de pacientes acometidos pela COVID-19. E a importância da implementação de estratégias de intervenção focadas nos riscos ocupacionais.
FreshRSS