Living labs represent a user-centric approach to solving real-world challenges by encouraging active participation of external stakeholders in co-designing the research and innovation process. Highlighted by contextual research and user co-creation, living labs are ideal for addressing the challenges of providing optimal healthcare to patients living in rural and remote regions. Our objective was to synthesise the existing research on the living lab approach in co-designing, developing or implementing a rural healthcare service, clinical intervention or health-related technology.

Scoping review.

A search was conducted on 10 May 2025, to identify articles from three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL).

We included published literature that presented a living lab approach to improve the provision of healthcare services in a rural environment. We excluded articles examining social determinants of health (eg, physical activity and general health promotion) without a direct link to clinical service innovation or healthcare delivery.

We collected data on study methodologies, settings, stakeholders and innovation types. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers using a standardised form. We used frequencies and a narrative synthesis to map characteristics, methods and contexts of living lab applications in rural healthcare.

The search identified a total of 1080 articles and ultimately included 11 articles. Studies were published between 2016 and 2025 and conducted in Canada (n=3), the USA (n=3), Australia (n=2), Guatemala (n=1), Uganda (n=1) and France/Portugal (n=1). Study settings included rural hospitals, regional health networks, Indigenous communities, farming and fishing communities and underserved rural regions. Health issues targeted included cardiovascular disease, diabetes, musculoskeletal conditions, perinatal care, palliative care and infectious disease management. Study methodologies included formalised, theory-driven frameworks (n=4), community-based participatory research (n=4), user- or human-centred design (n=3) and co-design workshops and interviews (n=3). Only one study explicitly used the term ‘living lab’ to describe their innovation.

Relatively few living lab approaches have been meaningfully applied in rural health. There is a need for greater global diversification, expanded domains of focus and more robust evaluation to fully understand the potential and impact of living labs in rural healthcare.

Acute lower limb ischaemia (ALI) is a life- and limb-threatening vascular emergency requiring urgent intervention. Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, outcome reporting for ALI remains inconsistent, limiting evidence synthesis and guideline development. The CORE-ALI study aims to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) to standardise outcome reporting and ensure the inclusion of both clinical and patient-centred metrics.

CORE-ALI will use a structured, multi-phase methodology guided by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting (COS-STAR) guidelines. Phase 1 involves stakeholder engagement through semi-structured interviews with patients, clinicians and policymakers from diverse European healthcare systems. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis to generate a preliminary list of outcomes. In Phase 2, a multi-round Delphi survey (anticipated two to three rounds) will prioritise and refine outcomes through consensus building, with quantitative data analysed using descriptive and non-parametric statistical methods. Phase 3 will culminate in a consensus meeting to finalise the COS. Multilingual accommodations will ensure inclusivity, and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliant platforms will secure data handling.

The study has received ethics approval from the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Innsbruck (EK Nr: 1082/2025) on 20/05/2025. Additional local ethics approvals are required and will be obtained at all participating sites prior to the initiation of recruitment. The final Core outcome set will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences and engagement with professional societies and patient organisations.

COMET initiative (Registration No. 3346).

Young women with disabilities (WWDs) face multiple barriers in accessing maternal healthcare services in low-resource settings. Consequently, they are at an increased risk of adverse maternal health outcomes due to young age and having a disability. This review focuses on synthesising evidence regarding the extent of access to maternal healthcare services and the barriers faced by young WWDs in Sub-Saharan Africa.

We will conduct a scoping review guided by the updated Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, Global Health, African Journal Online and Women’s Studies International will be performed to identify relevant articles published in English from 2007 to 2025. A team of two reviewers will independently screen the retrieved articles for relevancy based on the inclusion criteria, and a thematic synthesis will be undertaken to develop a descriptive analysis.

Since this review will only involve the analysis of published data, it does not require ethical approval. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

This review has been registered with the Open Science Framework DOI; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Q7Y8S.

Non-adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment remains a major challenge in high-burden regions. However, few studies have qualitatively examined the sociocultural and emotional barriers to adherence, particularly among Afghan refugees in Pakistan. This study explores the patient-related, sociocultural and treatment-related barriers to treatment adherence among patients with TB of Pakistani and Afghan origin living in Pakistan.

We conducted an exploratory qualitative study consisting of semistructured focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with purposively selected multisectoral stakeholders. The data were analysed thematically using a combination of inductive and deductive approaches.

We employed a qualitative study design in the TB DOTS (Directly Observed Treatment Short course) centres in the Haripur and Peshawar districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan.

We conducted IDIs (n=29) and FGDs (n=11) with three categories of participants: TB healthcare providers, patients with TB and their carers.

We identified several contributors to lower treatment adherence. These included patient-related barriers (eg, lack of awareness about TB and its treatment), sociocultural barriers (eg, stigma, refugee status of Afghan patients, gender roles and reliance on traditional and spiritual healing) and treatment-related barriers (eg, demanding treatment regimen and TB-induced depression).

Several personal, sociocultural and treatment-related barriers contribute to lower treatment adherence in patients with TB. A significant contributing factor to treatment non-adherence in patients is the high prevalence of anxiety and depression related to TB and its treatment, for which there is no treatment or counselling available at the DOTS level in Pakistan, warranting the need for mental health interventions that could improve adherence and treatment outcomes for both TB and depression.

ISRCTN10761003.

To explore intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians’ experiences of withdrawing mechanical ventilation during end-of-life care.

An exploratory qualitative design was used, with data collected via semistructured, face-to-face online interviews and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

We recruited ICU clinicians from two hospitals within the West Midlands region of the UK.

Semistructured, face-to-face online interviews were used to explore experiences with limitation of life-sustaining treatments in ICU, decision-making and practices for withdrawing mechanical ventilation.

22 ICU clinicians were interviewed (Physiotherapist=1, Advanced Critical Care Practitioners=4, Physicians=9 and Nurses=8), of which 13 were women (59%). Four themes were developed. (1) Multilayered communication: effective communication was key in planning withdrawal and informing family members, with conflicts arising from cultural differences. (2) Considerations regarding the mode of withdrawing invasive mechanical ventilation: clinicians expressed differing preferences for the method of mechanical ventilation withdrawal. (3) Multiprofessional teamwork: collaborative teamwork was vital, with palliative care practitioners consulted during conflicts or challenging symptoms. (4) Clinicians’ feelings and impact: clinicians empathised with families and experienced psychological burden.

Physician preferences influence the withdrawal process, which is communicated within the multidisciplinary team. Clear protocols can help reduce ambiguity and support less experienced clinicians. Reflection on these practices may help mitigate burnout and compassion fatigue. Further research should examine the effects of physician demographics and patient cultural diversity on the withdrawal process.

The UK’s medical workforce is under increasing strain, and this is compounded by increasing numbers of resident doctors diverging from specialist training pathways, instead entering non-training roles, reducing clinical hours or leaving the profession or UK workforce entirely. These decisions are shaped by both individual motivations and wider structural conditions, including unsatisfactory working conditions, limited flexibility and a perceived lack of support or autonomy. While pursuing alternative career routes offers personal and professional benefits, they can also delay progression to senior clinical roles, contributing to workforce instability. There remains limited understanding of how best to support retention, particularly given the varied contexts, settings and career trajectories of resident doctors. This realist synthesis will examine how, why and in what contexts resident doctors leave the National Health Service, and what interventions might support their retention.

This realist synthesis will follow Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards guidance and will be conducted in five iterative steps: (1) identifying existing theories to develop an initial programme theory; (2) undertaking formal and purposive searches to identify relevant UK-based literature; (3) selecting documents based on relevance and rigour; (4) extracting and coding data to support the development of explanatory insights; and (5) synthesising findings using a realist logic of analysis to develop and refine context-mechanism-outcome configurations. An advisory group will guide the review throughout. The final programme theory will inform the development of evidence-based recommendations and design principles to support resident doctor retention.

Ethical approval is not required for this synthesis of existing literature. Findings will be disseminated through academic publications, conference presentations and accessible formats, including infographics, plain English summaries and blog posts. Target audiences include resident doctors, medical educators, workforce planners and policymakers.

PROSPERO, CRD420251004453.