FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

How floods impact health systems: a scoping review of Australian research

Por: Dorfer · N. · Bailie · J. · Ahern · C. · McNaught · R. · Scott · K. · Matthews · V. · Morgan · G. G. · Ekanayake · K. · Bailie · R. — Diciembre 8th 2025 at 06:09
Objectives

Although the health impacts of floods are well described, there is limited research on how flooding affects health systems, services and the health workforce—despite their central role in mitigating and responding to these impacts. This scoping review examines the nature and extent of existing research evidence on the impact of flooding events on Australia’s health system.

Design

A scoping review following the Johanna Briggs Institute methodology.

Data sources

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest Central and PsycINFO were searched through to 22 October 2024. Reference lists of included publications were screened for additional publications.

Eligibility

We included studies that reported any health system or health service disruption associated with flooding in Australia. Disruptions encompassed impacts on hospitals, primary care, health information systems, infrastructure, public health and health promotion activities, and the health workforce. We included peer-reviewed publications, including original research, commentaries, perspectives, editorials, letters to the editor, modelling studies and reviews. Grey literature was excluded.

Data extraction and synthesis

Screening of full texts and data extraction were completed by two independent reviewers. A health system disruption analytical framework was iteratively developed and was used to categorise the findings.

Results

Our search identified 6687 publications, of which 28 were included in the final review. 13 publications were original research publications and 15 were commentaries or reviews, with the majority published in the past ten years. Of the publications included, most focused on disruptions to hospital services and transport systems, including a reduction in health workforce availability, primarily due to the latter. Less than one-third reported impacts on health services for socially vulnerable populations. Floods affect multiple levels of the health system, intersecting with impacts across three key domains: infrastructure and health information systems, access to healthcare and the health workforce.

Conclusions

Original research on how floods impact Australia’s health system, its services and workforce has been limited, particularly in relation to general practice, allied health and the differential impacts on socially vulnerable populations. Further research is needed to inform targeted disaster preparedness and response strategies and to understand the complex and intersecting impacts. The analytical framework developed in this review provides a way to conceptualise how floods disrupt different components of the health system and offers a foundation for future research and policy development to strengthen system resilience in the face of increasing flood risk.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Study Protocol of a feasibility and acceptability trial of Problem Management Plus with Emotional Processing (PM+EP) for forcibly displaced youth living in Sweden

Por: Mattelin · E. · Alozkan-Sever · C. · Shahnavaz · S. · Sijbrandij · M. · Mittendorfer-Rutz · E. · Akhtar · A. — Octubre 28th 2025 at 18:00
Introduction

Heightened rates of mental illness among children, young people and forcibly displaced adults are well-documented. Despite this, access to care in host countries is often low. Problem-management plus (PM+) is an intervention developed by the WHO that can be delivered through task-shifting by lay counsellors and has been shown to be effective in numerous studies. At the same time, it has been shown that PM+ has a limited effect on traumatic stress symptoms, a common problem among forcibly displaced individuals. In turn, to further these benefits, a novel emotional processing (EP) module has been developed to be adjunctively delivered alongside PM+(PM+EP).

Method and analysis

The current study is a randomised controlled feasibility and acceptability study. 60 participants aged 16–25 will be randomly allocated to either PM+, PM+EP or care as usual. The primary outcome of this study will be the feasibility and acceptability of the delivery of PM+EP in forcibly displaced youth. Secondary outcomes are self-rated measures of distress, depression and anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, personally identified problems, hope, use of services and medications, general well-being and social support.

Ethics and dissemination

Following ethical approval in February 2024, recruitment commenced in October 2024. Study completion is anticipated by December 2025. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and communication with relevant stakeholders.

Trial registration number

NCT06878092.

❌