FreshRSS

🔒
☐ ☆ ✇ Journal of Advanced Nursing

Current Status and Influencing Factors of Death Preparedness in Advanced Cancer Patients Based on the PRECEDE‐PROCEED Model: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Por: Xi Zhang · Xiaoli Wei · Ye Chen · Chenxi Zhou · Wenguo Wang · Yu Wang · Feng Li · Qifu Fan · Chenyi Lu · Meiliyang Wu · Tieying Zeng · Bao Chang — Marzo 17th 2026 at 17:03

ABSTRACT

Background

Death preparedness is an important prerequisite for improving the quality of life and the quality of death in advanced cancer patients. However, research on the level of death preparedness in patients is insufficient, and there is little understanding of the current status and influencing factors of death preparedness in advanced cancer patients.

Aim

This study aims to assess the current status of death preparedness and its influencing factors in advanced cancer patients.

Methods

Based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, a structured survey questionnaire was designed to collect data on personal factors (such as gender, age and residence area), interpersonal factors (such as social support, caregiver readiness and healthcare worker readiness) and social factors (such as care resources, policy support and information supply). Through multiple linear regression and BP neural network analysis, the study explores the impact and significance of these influencing factors on death preparedness in advanced cancer patients.

Results

A total of 930 valid questionnaires were collected in this study. The death preparedness score in advanced cancer patients was 72.18 ± 22.82, indicating a moderate level, with the highest score being the ‘reflexive care’ dimension and the lowest score being the ‘hospice programme’ dimension. Multivariate analysis revealed that meaning in life and social support were the most significant predictors of death preparedness in advanced cancer patients. In addition, personal factors such as dignity, household income and coping style, also played an important role. Interpersonal factors like social support, as well as social factors such as care resources and policy support, also had an impact on patients' death preparedness to some extent.

Conclusion

Death preparedness in advanced cancer patients is generally at a moderate level, and death preparedness is influenced by a combination of personal factors, interpersonal factors and social factors.

Impact

This study is based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model to comprehensively explore the influencing factors of death preparedness in advanced cancer patients. It provides theoretical support for improving life services for advanced cancer patients. It offers valuable practical experience and insights for societal attention and reform in end-of-life care.

Patient or Public Contribution

No Patient or Public Contributions were included in this paper.

☐ ☆ ✇ BMJ Open

Efficacy of anterior intrusion-based vertical control versus conventional sagittal retraction in adolescents with hyperdivergent mandibular retrognathia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Por: Shi · S. · Zhang · W. · Zhang · W. · Lin · M. · Chenyi · X. · Lu · Y. · Liu · Y. — Enero 30th 2026 at 11:06
Introduction

Hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion in adolescents is characterised by mandibular retrognathia with excessive vertical growth and clockwise mandibular rotation, which can worsen facial profile and airway-related morphology. Although mandibular advancement approaches are commonly used, they may increase the vertical dimension and are suboptimal for patients with long-face patterns. This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate a micro-implant-assisted protrusion correction technique designed to flatten the occlusal plane and promote counterclockwise mandibular rotation, thereby improving facial profile and pharyngeal space.

Methods and analysis

This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR; ChiCTR2100054105). This is a two-arm, multicentre, randomised, parallel-controlled trial. Ninety adolescents will be recruited from Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, Zhongshan Hospital (Fudan University), and Xinhua Hospital (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine), and will be randomly allocated (1:1) to the test or control group. The control group will receive conventional anterior teeth retraction, whereas the test group will receive a micro-implant-assisted vertical control protocol with occlusal plane flattening. The primary outcome is the change in the A point–nasion–B point angle. Secondary outcomes include changes in the occlusal plane, incisor and molar heights, and facial height. Measurements will be assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment and at 12 months after treatment completion.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shanghai Stomatological Hospital (approval no. (2022)006). The results of this study will be made available in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number

ChiCTR2100054105.

❌