Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory condition primarily caused by Cutibacterium acnes, which disrupts skin homeostasis, thereby triggering immune responses and sebum metabolism. Dysbiosis is an imbalance in the skin and gut microbiota identified as a significant factor contributing to acne progression. Standard therapy often relies on antibiotics, but the long-term use has increased antibiotic resistance, including in Indonesia. Consequently, alternative methods, such as probiotics and mesenchymal stromal cell secretomes, are gaining attention for immunomodulatory and regenerative properties. These novel therapies have shown promising results in modulating the skin and gut microbiota while reducing inflammation.

A phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial will be conducted using a parallel group design with four arms, namely: (1) standard therapy with oral probiotics and topical secretome (placebo), (2) standard therapy with oral probiotics (placebo) and topical secretome, (3) standard therapy with oral probiotics and topical secretome and (4) standard therapy with oral probiotics (placebo) and topical secretome (placebo). Sixty-four patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris will be randomly allocated to these groups. Interventions will be administered over a period of 8 weeks, with outcomes to be measured at baseline and post-therapy. This study will be conducted at the Dermatology and Venereology Department of Bali Mandara General Hospital (RSBM). The primary outcome will be the reduction of comedones and inflammatory lesions, assessed using the Yolov8 method. Secondary outcomes will include gut and skin health parameters, such as tryptophan metabolites, collagen, pH, moisture, sebum levels and IL-6, to explore the relationship between microbiome balance, skin condition and inflammation in acne.

This study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonisation–Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Ethical approval has been granted by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Bali Mandara Regional Hospital (Approval Reference Number: 060/EA/KEPK.RSBM.DINKES/2024). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. Data confidentiality and participant safety will be upheld throughout the trial. The results of this study will be disseminated through journals, scientific conferences and relevant academic platforms to ensure wide accessibility and to support further research and clinical application in the field of dermatology, particularly in addressing antibiotic resistance and microbiome-based acne therapies.

NCT06925386.

Poor participant retention in randomised clinical trials, resulting in missing outcome data, can impact the validity, reliability and generalisability of results. While participants’ views on general non-retention issues have been reported elsewhere, a qualitative evidence synthesis specifically focusing on trial processes (ie, outcome data collection) impacting retention has not been undertaken to date. This is an important research question to inform targeted interventions to support retention. This review aims to address this by systematically searching and synthesising the evidence on participant reasons for trial non-completion, linked to outcome data collection.

We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis of qualitative studies and mixed methods studies with a qualitative component, in Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Social Science Citation Index, Cumulative Index of Nursing & Allied Health Literature and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, up to February 2025. We used Thomas and Harden’s thematic synthesis approach. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative framework was used to assess confidence in the review findings.

We identified 11 studies reporting qualitative data from 14 separate trials, with findings from 105 trial non-retainers. The studies were undertaken between 2007 and 2025.

There were three types of participant non-retention behaviours reported across the studies, where participants either: (1) missed at least one clinic visit; (2) did not complete a postal questionnaire or (3) did not complete online data collection. We developed four analytical themes outlining participant-reported influences on trial non-retention, specifically related to trial processes (ie, data collection for outcome measures): fluctuating health, balancing trial burdens, navigating life as a trial participant and managing expectations of participation.

This review generates important insights into participants’ reasons for trial non-completion linked to outcome data collection. The review highlights the need for further research into supporting trial recruitment discussions that provide clear, realistic expectations for potential trial participants, as well as strategies that recognise, and where possible, address some of the influences on participants to improve outcome data completeness and ultimately improve trial retention.

To evaluate the association between exposure to occupational biomechanical factors and the incidence of surgically treated osteoarthritis (OA) treated with arthroplasty in the hip and knee among male construction workers.

Longitudinal register-based cohort study.

Male construction workers (n=291 062) who participated in a national Swedish occupational health examination programme between 1971 and 1993, delivered through multiple primary-level nationwide occupational health centres.

Hip and knee arthroplasties performed due to OA from 1987 to 2019 were identified through linkage with the Swedish National Patient Register. Data on age, smoking habits, body mass index, job title and self-reported biomechanical exposures were collected during the health examinations. Occupational biomechanical workload was assessed using eight factors from a job-exposure matrix. Poisson regression was applied to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) associated with each type of occupational biomechanical exposure.

The study included 10 336 cases of hip arthroplasties and 8926 cases of knee arthroplasties. All studied biomechanical risk factors were associated with an increased risk of knee OA requiring arthroplasty, especially for individuals exposed to static work in non-neutral lumbar postures (IRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.65) and those with a high frequency of kneeling (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.45). In contrast, only a few biomechanical factors were associated with an increased risk of hip OA requiring arthroplasty. Similar results were observed when alternative exposure measures, such as occupational group and self-reported exposure assessments, were employed.

Occupational workload was associated with an increased risk of knee arthroplasty due to OA, whereas the association for hip arthroplasty remains unclear.

Waiting for cardiac surgery is a stressful life event for most patients. Exploring what people experience while waiting and understanding their preferences and views on how waiting time could be improved will help to inform new strategies for more efficacious waiting list management. In this study, we explored experiences and views of people waiting for elective cardiac surgery across four major London hospitals.

Mixed-methods cross-sectional survey, with explanatory concurrent design.

Four cardiac surgery services across two National Health Service Trusts in London.

Patients on waiting lists for elective cardiac surgery at Royal Brompton, Harefield, St Thomas and King’s College hospitals between October 2023 and March 2024.

Experience of waiting for surgery, and preferences about how waiting time could be improved.

554 out of 1041 invited participants agreed to participate (recruitment rate 53.2%). Among them, 274 fully completed the survey (completion rate 49.5%). Most participants (from 52.2% to 70.9%) reported their daily and social activities were impacted by their cardiac condition, and worrying was an ubiquitous feeling (reported by 86%). Psychological distress was reported differently across women and men (higher in women). Eight themes were identified: worrying, daily activities, family/friends and social activities, sexual life, waiting list experience and feelings, communication, most important factors for surgery and suggested improvements. Communication with the surgeon and clinical team, and regular updates on waiting list progress are suggested as crucial factors to alleviate stress, thus potentially improving the experience of waiting for the surgery.

This study highlights the importance of emotional support, clear communication, regular updates on waiting list progress and building trust with the clinical team to improve patient-centred care while waiting for elective cardiac surgery. This finding can offer valuable insights for managing waiting lists in other surgery waiting list contexts.

NCT05996640.

This study aims to identify factors associated with early antenatal care (ANC) initiation using a survival analysis approach applied to nationally representative data.

This study used a cross-sectional design based on data from the nationally representative 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. The survey was conducted at the community level across all administrative divisions of Bangladesh. A total of 5128 ever-married women aged 15–49 years who had a live birth within 5 years prior to the survey were included in the analysis. Women with missing or incomplete information regarding the timing of their first ANC visit were excluded from the study.

The primary outcome was early initiation of ANC, defined as the first ANC contact within the first trimester.

The study applied survival analysis methods, including Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and an Accelerated Failure Time model, to assess the determinants of early ANC initiation.

Only 37.9% (95% CI 36.0% to 39.9%) of women in Bangladesh initiated ANC within the first trimester. Early ANC initiation was associated with higher maternal age, education, skilled employment, wealthier households, media exposure, higher decision-making autonomy, higher husband’s education and urban residence. Women who reported that distance to a health facility was not a big problem had initiated ANC earlier than those who considered distance a major barrier. Regional disparities were also evident, with women from Barishal, Chattogram, Rajshahi, Khulna and Rangpur accessing ANC later than those in Dhaka.

Persistent inequalities in early ANC initiation highlight the need for targeted policies to reduce financial barriers, improve healthcare accessibility and strengthen awareness campaigns to ensure equitable maternal healthcare in Bangladesh.

Hospital patients are at an increased risk of falls, which are a significant safety concern within healthcare settings.¹ Understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced fall risks is essential for identifying key factors that could inform future fall prevention strategies.² This scoping review aims to explore the barriers and challenges associated with preventing inpatient falls in the context of the post-COVID-19 environment.

The methodology for this scoping review follows the framework established by Arksey and O’Malley. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted using specific keywords to identify relevant published studies. Searches will be performed across selected electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest and Web of Science, covering publications from 2014 to 2024. This review will focus on a global perspective. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts to identify potential studies for inclusion. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be retrieved for full-text review, and their references will be assessed for relevance using the same criteria. The PRISMA flow diagram will guide the review process. Data will be extracted, analysed and charted according to categories from the selected publications.

This scoping review will provide a comprehensive overview of the barriers and challenges in preventing inpatient falls in the post-pandemic context. The findings will be disseminated through submission for publication in a scientific journal.

This scoping review protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (OSF) available at https://osf.io/.

Falls are highly prevalent among individuals with dementia, largely due to the cognitive and physical impairments associated with the condition. Understanding the barriers and challenges to fall prevention in community-dwelling individuals with dementia is essential for developing tailored strategies that address their unique risks. Despite the existing evidence on fall prevention in older adults, few reviews specifically examine the obstacles faced by persons with dementia and their caregivers in community settings. This scoping review, therefore, aims to map the barriers and challenges to preventing falls among community-dwelling individuals with dementia.

This review will follow Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework and be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses—Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Six electronic databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus and Embase) will be searched for relevant studies published between 2014 and 2024. Grey literature sources, including dissertations and conference proceedings, will also be included. Data will be charted and synthesised thematically to provide an overview of barriers and contextual factors influencing fall prevention. The study commenced in August 2025 and is expected to be completed by February 2026.

As this review involves the analysis of existing literature, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries tailored for healthcare providers and caregiver groups.

The protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/gnw47/(dataset).

Migrants in Australia are a vulnerable group to drowning, yet their participation in water safety programs remains limited. Previous research has focused on migrants already engaged in water-related activities, overlooking perceptions from those facing broader access challenges. Additionally, migrants have often been treated as a homogeneous group, neglecting intersectional factors such as age, gender, ethnicity and income level that influence access to programs.

This phenomenological qualitative study addresses these gaps by employing a novel approach to recruitment: conducting in-depth interviews with purposively selected recent migrants in a non-traditional setting—hairdressing salons—to capture diverse perspectives. A variety of ethnicities, ages and genders were recruited. Thematic analysis with an inductive approach was used to analyse the data.

Findings showed that most migrants were unaware of water safety programmes. While acknowledging the importance of water safety, they prioritised other pressures, such as income generation. However, affordable and culturally tailored training programmes for adults, delivered in culturally safe environments, may enable participation. Social connections, especially among students, could also be leveraged. Although parents rarely participated, they prioritised enrolling their children in swim training. Ethnicity-specific adaptations, such as native-language trainers, were considered desirable. Informants suggested disseminating water safety information to migrants before arrival in Australia or through community magazines and universities.

This study highlights the importance of intersectional, community-driven designing of water safety programmes and demonstrates the effectiveness of innovative recruitment methods in reaching underrepresented migrant populations. These findings provide actionable insights for developing inclusive and accessible drowning prevention strategies.

Health workers (HWs) and their representative health worker organisations (RHWOs) contribute to the design of pharmaceutical policy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but their roles remain underappreciated. HWs and RHWOs can influence drug development, distribution, financing and access; however, which specific aspects HWs and RHWOs contribute to, and how they create change, remains insufficiently mapped within the global health literature. This protocol describes our process for conducting a scoping review to derive, describe, and classify existing literature on how HWs and RHWOs engage in pharmaceutical policy processes in LMICs.

This review will follow the updated Arksey and O’Malley five-stage scoping review framework supported by iterations of methodological guidance and will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We will search Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and CAB Global Health for English-language peer-reviewed literature published between 2005 and 2025. Studies must discuss HW and RHWO involvement or influence in pharmaceutical policy or describe the roles, governance contexts or strategies of HWs or RHWOs in the context of pharmaceutical policy. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts using Covidence software to determine eligibility. We will chart data using Excel and summarise the findings thematically. We will consult stakeholders in the final stage of this review to provide feedback on the results of our review and guide our findings further in terms of actionable policy implications.

Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review of published literature. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, academic presentations and policy engagement with global health actors. This review will inform future research and support evidence-informed pharmaceutical policymaking in LMICs.

Monkeypox (Mpox) is an emerging public health concern globally as well as in Pakistan, with over 100 000 confirmed cases reported across 120 countries as of July 2024.

To assess healthcare professionals’ knowledge and preparedness regarding Mpox and examine its association with demographic factors.

Quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study.

Conducted in tertiary care public sector hospitals of Rawalpindi district, Pakistan, from October 2024 to February 2025.

A total of 230 healthcare professionals of either gender, aged over 18 years, currently working in the public sector tertiary care hospitals of Rawalpindi district for at least 6 months were included.

The mean age of the respondents was 29.13±6.55 years. The majority were women (147, 63.9%), post-graduate trainees (106, 46.1%), with 1–5 years of experience (184, 80%) and from medicine and allied disciplines (131, 57%). Most participants had an average level of knowledge regarding Mpox (137, 59.6%), with only a few demonstrating good knowledge (40, 17.4%). Half of the participants reported that their healthcare facilities lacked proper protocols for managing Mpox cases (97, 42.2%). Significant associations were observed between Mpox knowledge scores and participants’ field of specialty (p=0.007); notably, respondents from basic sciences had a higher proportion of good knowledge scores.

Overall, the level of knowledge and preparedness regarding Mpox among healthcare professionals was average. There is an urgent need for standardised Mpox preparedness protocols, outbreak response planning and comprehensive training programmes to enhance readiness for future outbreaks.

While previous studies have shown an association between anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and endometriosis, there are limited data on the relationship between AMH levels and age among women with endometriosis.

The present study aimed to investigate the associations between age and AMH levels in women with and without endometriosis.

A cross-sectional, population-based study using data from the ongoing Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

A total of 1005 eligible reproductive-age women were selected. These participants were categorised into two groups: women with confirmed endometriosis (n=305) and controls (n=700).

None.

Association between AMH levels and age among women with endometriosis and healthy controls, using linear, quadratic and segmented regression analyses.

A total of 1005 women aged 18–48 years participated in the study, including 305 (30.3%) with endometriosis and 700 (69.7%) healthy controls. Women with endometriosis had significantly lower AMH levels compared with healthy controls (1.99±1.42 vs 2.30±1.61 ng/mL; p=0.029). In healthy controls, an increase of 1 year was associated with –0.15 ng/mL of AMH (95% CI: –0.17 to –0.14). Segmented regression identified a threshold at 27 years (1.92), with a sharper decline below this age (slope: –0.35, 95% CI: –0.47 to –0.23; p

Our study showed that women with endometriosis had significantly lower AMH levels compared with healthy controls and did not demonstrate the age-related threshold observed in the control group, where AMH levels declined more sharply before 27 years of age. These findings suggest that endometriosis may alter the typical pattern of AMH, indicating that clinicians should interpret AMH levels with caution in this population. Further research is needed to validate these results in other populations and explore alternative biomarkers or strategies for more accurately assessing ovarian reserve in women with endometriosis.