Conectar
To evaluate the effectiveness of targeted interventions in optimising Beyond-Use Date (BUD) management and workload distribution to reduce intravenous (IV) medication errors and improve patient safety in a resource-limited hospital setting.
This study employed a pre- and post-intervention observational design.
A four-month intervention was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in China, following a baseline assessment of IV medication practices. The intervention included the establishment of BUD guidelines, redistribution of staff workloads and targeted training sessions. IV preparation and administration errors were observed in Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services (PIVAS) centers and medical wards, and changes in error rates were recorded.
In the PIVAS center, IV preparation errors decreased from 0.19% to 0.12%. Medical wards showed a decrease in administration errors from 38.3% to 30.0%, with improvements noted in areas such as adherence to BUD and storage protocols. The intervention demonstrated significant improvements in medication safety by enhancing BUD compliance and balancing workloads.
The implementation of structured BUD guidelines, workload optimisation, and training significantly reduced IV medication errors, highlighting the effectiveness of management-driven interventions in improving safety practices within hospital settings.
This study underscores the importance of BUD management and balanced workloads in reducing medication errors, contributing to safer and more efficient IV medication administration.
This study addresses the challenge of medication errors in resource-constrained healthcare environments, providing evidence that structured management interventions can enhance patient safety. The findings are relevant to healthcare providers and managers in similar settings.
This study follows the TIDieR and STROBE guidelines for structured reporting.
No patient or public contribution.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of moxibustion on pressure ulcers. A thorough search was performed for articles published from database inception up to 14 December 2023. Randomized controlled trials, which evaluated the effects of moxibustion were included. Finally, 11 relevant trails that enrolled a total of 795 participants met inclusion criteria. The results of meta-analysis suggested beneficial effects of moxibustion for pressure ulcer compared with control on the response rate (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.13–1.29; p = 0.82; I 2 = 0%), healing time (MD: −5.69; 95% CI: −9.58 to −1.80; p<0.05; I 2 = 97%) and pressure ulcer scale for healing scores (MD: −1.13; 95% CI: −1.36 to −0.89; p = 0.79; I 2 = 0%). The evidence suggests that moxibustion possesses satisfactory efficacy in promoting healing of pressure ulcers. However, due to the small number of trials included in this study, as well as the small sample size and high risk of bias, we were unable to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of moxibustion for pressure ulcers.
To construct key quality indicators for aged care facilities in China.
Evaluating the care quality in aged care facilities is problematic. Evaluation of nursing care quality is important for improving nursing and self-supervision in aged care facilities. However, a few regulations and studies regarding care quality evaluation have been implemented in China.
This two-tier Delphi study aimed to achieve consensus on key quality indicators for aged care facilities in China. The entry pool was determined by literature review and research team discussion, followed by a discussion by a panel of experts to establish the items of the Delphi study. Finally, key care quality indicators were established through a two-round Delphi study. This study followed the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines.
The initial 16 quality indicators of the entry pool was developed based on a literature review and a group discussion. Sixteen quality indicators were reduced to eight after the expert discussion. After two rounds of expert consultation, the eight quality indicators became nine, which were then evaluated for importance, formula rationality, and operability using Kendall's harmony coefficients (first round: 0.150, 0.143 and 0.169, respectively; second round: 0.209, 0.159 and 0.173, respectively).
Key quality indicators provide quantifiable evidence for evaluating the care quality in aged care facilities, but their applicability needs continuous improvement.
Nine key quality indicators were selected from numerous indicators for measuring the care quality in aged care facilities, supporting the evaluation of the care quality and self-supervision for aged care facilities.
No elderly or public contribution.
FreshRSS