Conectar
Children experience significant psychological and physical stress during medical procedures. Picture books can help reduce anxiety by familiarising children with their upcoming procedures.
To synthesise and evaluate the effectiveness of picture books on reducing preoperative anxiety in children and their parents.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials reported following the PRISMA guidelines.
PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to January 1, 2024. This review includes randomised controlled trials published in Chinese or English that evaluate the efficacy of picture book interventions in reducing preoperative anxiety among children undergoing elective surgery. Studies were excluded if: (1) they were conference abstracts, protocols or repetitive publications; (2) they were not available in full text; (3) the data reported in the study could not be obtained from the authors; and (4) they were not published in Chinese or English. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2.0 was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.
Five studies with a total of 418 patients were included in the analysis. Picture books can significantly reduce children's preoperative anxiety (SMD = −0.57, 95% CI = −0.76 to −0.37; p < 0.001). The certainty of the evidence for the effectiveness of picture books on preoperative anxiety was considered moderate.
Picture books can effectively reduce preoperative anxiety in children by familiarising them with the unknown. It has shown the potential to serve as preoperative educational material for paediatric patients.
Not applicable.
This meta-analysis highlights the effectiveness of picture books in reducing preoperative anxiety in children undergoing medical procedures. Healthcare professionals should consider integrating these interventions into preoperative health education.
CRD42023435105 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023435105)
Patients often consider bone marrow aspiration and biopsy to be one of the most painful medical procedures. The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce pain during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy remains unclear.
To synthesize existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in mitigating procedural pain among patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Six electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 15, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Version 2.0. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 16. The certainty of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach.
This meta-analysis included 18 studies derived from 17 articles involving a total of 1017 participants. The pooled results revealed statistically significant pain reduction effects using distraction (SMD: −.845, 95% CI: −1.344 to −.346, p < .001), powered bone marrow biopsy system (SMD: −.266, 95% CI: −.529 to −.003, p = .048), and acupoint stimulation (SMD: −1.016, 95% CI: −1.995 to −.037, p = .042) among patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. However, the pooled results on hypnosis (SMD: −1.228, 95% CI: −4.091 to 1.515, p = .368) showed no significant impact on pain reduction. Additionally, the pooled results for distraction did not demonstrate a significant effect on operative anxiety (MD: −2.942, 95% CI: −7.650 to 1.767, p = .221).
Distraction, powered bone marrow biopsy system and acupoint stimulation are effective in reducing pain among patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
Not applicable.
This meta-analysis highlights the effectiveness of distraction, powered bone marrow biopsy system and acupoint stimulation for reducing pain in patients undergoing bone marrow biopsy. Healthcare professionals should consider integrating these interventions into pain management practices for these patients.
(PROSPERO): CRD42023422854.
FreshRSS