Conectar
To identify the principal factors influencing the implementation of high-value healthcare performance evaluation and to examine the interrelationships among these factors.
Value-based health care (VBHC) is gaining momentum as a model that focuses on improving patient outcomes. However, there is still a lack of understanding of the multifaceted factors that contribute to its successful implementation.
Theoretical modelling and mixed research methods.
First, this study constructed a framework of influencing factors on the implementation of VBHC performance evaluation based on the Technology-Organization-Environment model. Second, a representative set of influencing factors for healthcare performance evaluation was identified. The implementation of performance evaluation was identified based on a literature analysis and a case study in China. Finally, experts were invited to assess the relevance of the aforementioned influencing factors, and the collected data were analysed using Interpretative Structural Model. The PRISMA-ScR checklist guided the reporting of this study.
We initially constructed the theory framework with the objective of categorising and summarising the influential factors and potential problems revealed in the implementation of patient VBHC performance evaluation in general hospitals. Subsequently, 15 key factors were identified through interviews with 10 experts. Then, a six-level hierarchy was developed to construct a visual structure diagram, the purpose of which was to clarify the hierarchy of roles of each influencing factor. Finally, we categorise the influencing factors into four clusters based on their driving power and dependency within the system.
The insights from this research will assist hospital managers in identifying and prioritising the key factors that influence high-value healthcare performance.
This study provides a reliable pathway reference for clinical and nursing performance value enhancement and provides important insights into resource allocation and decision-making for clinical practitioners.
No patient or public contribution.
To establish and validate a set of best nursing practice indicators for medical groups in Chinese general hospitals based on value-based healthcare (VBHC) theory.
A modified Delphi method.
This study engaged experienced clinical nurses from public hospitals and multidisciplinary experts in operations management. Through a literature review and structured brainstorming, a comprehensive framework for assessing best nursing practices in Chinese general hospital medical groups was developed. A modified Delphi method was then employed to establish an indicator framework, followed by the Combined Empowerment-MABAC method to weight and validate the indicators using empirical data collected between June 2023 and October 2023. The CREDES checklist guided the reporting of this study.
Sixteen experts, each with at least 10 years of experience in nurse management from nine healthcare organizations, participated in two rounds of consultation. The experts' responses and suggestions for rewording, deleting and adding items were incorporated into each round. Of the 34 proposed indicators, 25 were approved, covering healthcare service capacity, efficiency, quality and safety, patient experience and cost.
The Delphi survey reached a consensus on necessary actions to improve nursing performance. The developed indicator system provides a foundational framework for standardizing the monitoring of care quality and performance assessment in Chinese clinical healthcare groups, with broad applicability.
This study provides a reliable basis for developing a nursing performance assessment database, offering crucial insights for measuring quality of care and improving patient value.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
No Patient or Public Contribution, because the relevant data of this article comes from the literature database.
The present study aimed to investigate the trends and research status of sexual healthcare.
We searched the Web of Science database for relevant articles concerning sexual healthcare, published between 2009 and 31 December 2022. Data collected include: the number of publications, authors, journals, countries, institutions, keywords. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to conduct the bibliometric study and visualise the analysis.
A total of 1450 publications were included. The number of publications on sexual healthcare shows a fluctuating upward trend, and a stable core group of authors has been formed. The Journal of Clinical Nursing published the most articles on sexual healthcare (140 publications). The United States of America published the most articles (723, 49.86%). The research institution with the highest number of publications is the University of São Paulo. According to the keyword, timeline view and prominence mapping analysis, we believe that ‘Female sexual health’, ‘HIV’, ‘LGBT’ and ‘Sexual Healthcare Services’ may be new research hotspots in the field of sexual healthcare.
This study describes the research status of sexual healthcare research over the past 14 years. The findings of this study can provide helpful reference and guidance for the development trend and research direction of sexual healthcare.
FreshRSS