The aim of this study was to understand the needs of children and young people of a parent with young-onset dementia, to inform the development of a nursing model.
Children and young people of a parent diagnosed with young onset dementia have a range of needs that are subject to change and aligned to their stage of development and growth.
Systematic review.
Searches were conducted in PsycInfo (1806–Jan 2025), Medline (1996–Jan 2025) and CINAHL (1961–Jan 2025); search terms were developed in consultation with an academic librarian.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses was used to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the findings and the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool to assess quality. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024534104). Needs identified from the literature were matched with the activities and interventions of a specialist nursing model.
Searches yielded 223 records of which 17 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the majority of which used qualitative methods (N = 16). A thematic synthesis approach was used to analyse data to reveal four emergent themes: (1) finding a way, (2) social connection and peer support, (3) preserving childhood and adolescence and (4) practical support, including the needs relating to education. Identified needs: knowledge and information, emotional support, consistency in education and development, maintaining social connections, physical and psychological well-being, and grief and loss were mapped against a specialist nurse role.
Children and young people with a parent diagnosed with young-onset dementia face unique challenges compared to older carers. Despite growing awareness of their needs, this population is often overlooked in national dementia strategies. Developing a specialist nurse role is a positive step, but broader systemic support is essential to safeguard their well-being and future opportunities.
This study adheres to the PRISMA reporting guidelines.
A bespoke Research Advisory Group, consisting of people with young onset dementia, young family carers, clinicians and academics, guided the review.
This study sought to explore the relationship between whistleblowing and ethical sensitivity among nurses and midwives working in delivery rooms.
A sequential mixed-methods research design.
Online data collection included 209 participants (quantitative/snowball sampling) via demographic forms and Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire, and 9 interviews (qualitative) with semistructured questions.
The ethical sensitivity levels of the participants were found to be high. It was determined that the ethical sensitivity levels were higher in individuals who were married, had a bachelor's degree, were midwives, worked in shifts and wanted to make an ethical report in the past but could not do so. Qualitative data showed that the participants were most inclined to report legal violations such as theft, invasion of privacy and abuse of office. It was determined that whistleblowing was usually reported verbally or in writing to senior management; that whistleblowers felt brave but were afraid of possible negative consequences.
Ethical sensitivity was identified as a factor that influences whistleblowing among nurses and midwives working in delivery rooms. In the qualitative phase, participants tended to identify legal violations as whistleblowing triggers and mostly reported such incidents to high-level managers.
This study reveals the hesitancy of nurses and midwives to report, underlining the importance of a supportive health culture—an organizational climate within healthcare institutions that fosters transparency, psychological safety and ethical behavior to promote patient safety and accountability.
The study found that nurses' and midwives' ethical sensitivity influences their whistleblowing behaviours, with most reports directed at managers for legal violations. Fear of sanctions underscores the study's role in enhancing ethical climate and patient safety.
MMAT guidelines were followed.
Nurses and Midwiwes contributed to the results of the research, ensuring that it determined link between Whistleblowing behavior and ethical sensitivity.
To examine if and how selected German hospitals use nurse-sensitive clinical indicators and perspectives on national/international benchmarking.
Qualitative study.
In 2020, 18 expert interviews were conducted with key informants from five purposively selected hospitals, being the first in Germany implementing Magnet® or Pathway®. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis with deductive-inductive coding. The study followed the COREQ guideline.
Three major themes emerged: first, limited pre-existence of and necessity for nurse-sensitive data. Although most interviewees reported data collection for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers and falls with injuries, implementation varied and interviewees highlighted the necessity to develop additional nurse-sensitive indicators for the German context. Second, the theme creating an enabling data environment comprised building clinicians' acceptance, establishing a data culture, and reducing workload by using electronic health records. Third, challenges and opportunities in establishing benchmarking were identified but most interviewees called for a national or European benchmarking system.
The need for further development of nurse-sensitive clinical indicators and its implementation in practice was highlighted. Several actions were suggested at hospital level to establish an enabling data environment in clinical care, including a nationwide or European benchmarking system.
Involving nurses in data collection, comparison and benchmarking of nurse-sensitive indicators and their use in practice can improve quality of patient care.
Nurse-sensitive indicators were rarely collected, and a need for action was identified. The study results show research needs on nurse-sensitive indicators for Germany and Europe. Measures were identified to create an enabling data environment in hospitals. An initiative was started in Germany to establish a nurse-sensitive benchmarking capacity.
Clinical practitioners and nurse/clinical managers were interviewed.
To review current evidence on the implementation and impact of virtual nursing care in long-term aged care.
An integrative rapid literature review.
Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Ageline and Scopus.
The review included studies involving virtual care interventions provided by nurses (or by a multidisciplinary team including nurses) to older people in residential aged care that reported health outcomes or stakeholder experiences. Consistent with PRISMA guidelines, databases were systematically searched in July and August 2024, focusing on literature published since 2014. Studies were screened in Covidence by three team members, with conflicts resolved by additional reviewers. Studies not involving nurses or not set in aged care were excluded.
The search identified 13 studies, which included quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method approaches, conducted in both Australian and international settings, as well as in rural and metropolitan locations. Nurses were often involved as part of an existing virtual care programme, typically located in a hospital setting. The training and credentials of nurses delivering VN varied in terms of specialisation and advanced practice. The model of care in general was ad hoc, though in some cases there were regular, scheduled VN consultations. The time requirements for onsite staff and nurses were not well articulated in any of the studies, and information on the funding models used was also lacking.
There is some evidence that VN interventions in aged care may improve communication, enhance person-centred care and reduce emergency department presentations and hospitalisations.
Rigorous, ongoing evaluation of VN interventions is required to ensure their appropriate application in residential aged care.