Conectar
To combine, synthesise, and interpret qualitative evidence from studies exploring the causes, immediate responses, and preventive measures of needle stick injuries from the perspective of healthcare workers.
In this qualitative evidence synthesis, the qualitative data from the included studies were synthesised to identify overarching themes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis flowchart, Joanna Briggs Institute tool, and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research checklist were used in the meta-synthesis process.
The MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, ProQuest, ClinicalKey and Scopus databases were searched between December 14 and December 31, 2024 for studies published between January 2000 and December 2024.
Nine primary research studies were included and the following themes were identified: unpredicted patient movement, casual attitude, recapping, excessive workload, scarcity of article or safety equipment, inadequate training or experience, vigilance, ongoing training, nurturing workplace culture, emotional response, re-living the injury and fear of reprimand.
Needle stick injuries result from a complex interplay of individual, administrative, engineering, and environmental factors, but there are potential solutions to address these issues.
Policymakers in healthcare settings would benefit greatly from an understanding of the causes, immediate responses, and preventive aspects of needle stick injuries. These findings can direct the creation of focused interventions and safety procedures by identifying important risk variables and useful coping mechanisms.
The causes, immediate responses, and preventive measures of needle stick injuries were explored. Findings can help develop protocols to lower needle stick injury rates and increase worker safety.
ENTREQ guidelines.
This research is a systematic review of published peer-reviewed studies.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024620673.
Poor oral health is a common but often overlooked concern in palliative care, negatively impacting patients' quality of life. There is limited understanding of how palliative care providers (PCPs) approach oral health promotion in this context. This review synthesises evidence on the knowledge, attitudes and practices of PCPs regarding oral health care and strategies to support them in this area.
Integrative review.
A systematic literature search was undertaken until January 2025 across multiple databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, ProQuest, EMBASE and Scopus) and grey literature. Inclusion criteria focused on nurses, medical specialists and allied health professionals involved in palliative or end-of-life care, with no publication year restriction.
This review followed Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) framework for integrative reviews. Study quality was assessed using appropriate tools for qualitative and quantitative studies, clinical guidelines and screening tools. A hybrid thematic synthesis approach was used for analysis.
Twenty-five studies were included, mostly of moderate to high quality. Sample sizes ranged from 8 to 1339, with most participants being nurses and nursing assistants, followed by medical professionals. Findings revealed inconsistent knowledge, varied practices and limited prioritisation of oral health care. Barriers included system constraints, limited training and patient-related challenges. Supportive strategies such as guidelines, screening tools and educational interventions were identified.
A significant gap exists in PCP knowledge and practices regarding oral healthcare due to various barriers, with few supportive strategies documented in this field.
There is an urgent need for enhanced education, robust evidence-based guidelines and tailored training for providers to advance and integrate oral health care in palliative care settings.
PRISMA Checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
Investigate the perception of male accessibility to the fields of nursing practice by those studying or teaching nursing in England.
Cross-sectional survey.
Online questionnaire with three closed-scale questions and two open-text questions designed to elicit perceptions on the accessibility of men to the fields of nursing practice. The questionnaire was distributed to the staff and students at 61 nursing schools in England. Inferential and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the closed questions data and inductive content analysis was used to analyse open-text questions data.
Students (n = 52) and staff (n = 51) responded to the survey. Adult (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) and mental health (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) were perceived as the most accessible fields of nursing practice to men, and child (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) the least. Specialised practice areas in acute and emergency (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2), education (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2), leadership (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), prison services (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and research (Mdn = 7, IQR = 2) were rated the most accessible to men and neonatal care (Mdn = 3, IQR = 3) the least. Societal stereotyping and stigma were seen as barriers to men entering the nursing profession. The perception that nursing is a feminised profession persists and a distrust of men is associated with child nursing. Men were viewed as progressing to leadership roles with greater ease than women.
Societal level stereotyping and stigma are perceived as prevalent in nursing practice areas considered less accessible to men entering the nursing profession.
This study adds insight into the gendered nature of nursing and highlights the barriers to men entering a profession with a workforce crisis.
STROBE cross-sectional studies guidelines. COREQ guidelines for content analysis.
No patient or public contribution.
To evaluate clinical nurses' perceptions and acceptability of procedure videos developed to support them during rare clinical procedures. In addition, a secondary aim was to investigate whether these videos reduce anxiety and enhance clinical reasoning.
A descriptive multi-methods study within a pre-post-implementation evaluation design.
Seven locally developed procedure videos (non-invasive ventilation (n = 2), temporary cardiac pacing (n = 3) and pericardiocentesis (n = 2)) were evaluated using questionnaires before and after a 6-month implementation period at a local health district in Australia. Participants self-rated their clinical reasoning skills in response to video procedures, mapped against the Clinical Reasoning cycle stages. The Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) assessed anxiety towards rare procedures. Data from open-ended questions were analysed using inductive content analysis.
A total of 247 participants completed the pre-implementation questionnaire, and 133 completed the post-implementation questionnaire. Before implementation, many reported feeling heightened anxiety when faced with rare or infrequent procedures, reporting levels that exceeded commonly accepted clinical thresholds for concern. Content analysis revealed persistent concerns among participants, including the need for support during new procedures and a fear of making errors. Before implementation, participants reported searching online for videos to support undertaking new procedures. Following implementation, most participants reported that viewing the videos enhanced their learning experience and improved their clinical reasoning. Perceived anxiety towards undertaking rare procedures was not significantly different from post-implementation.
This study highlights the need for timely support during infrequent clinical procedures, as participants reported anxiety about them. It also demonstrates that procedure videos are valued tools for nurses before rare clinical procedures.
Rare procedures are linked to nurse anxiety and mixed emotions, some of which may be eustress. Organisations can enhance clinical resources for nursing staff by providing online videos tailored to local practices and context, which many nurses find helpful for improving clinical reasoning when undertaking rare procedures.
This study highlights the anxiety nurses experience before rare procedures and the significance of incorporating multimedia resources, especially online videos, in nursing professional development for rarely performed procedures. Additionally, it informs employers about nursing staff preferences.
SQUIRE 2.0 reporting was adhered to.
None.
Nurse-led education programs in childcare settings are critical for improving early childhood health outcomes and caregiver practices. Despite their potential, a systematic synthesis of their effectiveness is lacking.
To summarize the characteristics and evaluate the effectiveness of existing nurse-led education programs in childcare settings through a systematic review of experimental studies.
This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases from inception to December 9, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024618983).
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 900 childcare workers and 920 families. The programs targeted two main areas: prevention of child health issues and management of child health issues. Lectures and group discussions were the most frequently used strategies. Nurses assumed diverse roles, including educators, consultants, and facilitators. The findings revealed several benefits, including reduced rates of upper respiratory illness, improved family health practices—such as appropriate medication use—and enhanced childcare worker competencies in first aid knowledge.
Nurses play a critical role in implementing education programs in childcare settings. Their contributions should be fully integrated into program planning and delivery. Future research should adopt rigorous methodologies to strengthen evidence-based practices and improve child health outcomes and caregiver competencies.
Evaluate the effect of IV line labels on nurses' identification of high-alert medications in a simulated scenario of multiple infusions for critically ill patients.
Randomised crossover simulation experimental study.
A study was conducted on 29 nurses working in intensive care for over 6 months. They were given two critical scenarios in a simulated environment, one with labels and the other without labels, involving multiple intravenous infusions. The nurses had to identify the medications infused into the critical patients' intravenous lines and disconnect a specific line. The data were collected and analysed to evaluate the errors made by the nurses in identifying and disconnecting the medications and the time they spent carrying out the tasks. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyse the variation in outcome before and after the intervention.
Approximately one-third of the study participants incorrectly identified the intravenous lines in both scenarios. There was no significant difference in the average number of errors between the scenarios with and without labels. However, the time taken to perform the tasks in the scenario with labels was 1 min less than in the scenario without labels, suggesting a potential efficiency gain.
The labels on the intravenous lines allowed for quick drug identification and disconnection. The professionals performed similarly in correctly recognising the high-alert medication intravenous lines, in the scenarios with or without labels.
The label can be used as a technology to prevent misidentification of high-alert medications administered to critically ill patients through intravenous lines, thereby enhancing medication safety in healthcare institutions.
No Public Contribution.
To identify and critically appraise instruments that have been used to measure nurse resilience.
A scoping review.
Comprehensive literature searches were conducted using four electronic databases CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Emcare from the year 2012 to December 2024.
The titles, then abstracts, of retrieved articles were screened by the authors against inclusion and exclusion criteria, then full-text screening was performed using Rayyan. Data about the study characteristics and the instruments used to measure nurse resilience were extracted. Copies of the instruments used to measure resilience were obtained and appraised.
Of the n = 4694 publications identified in the initial search n = 386 were included in the scoping review. Studies originated in n = 45 countries, the majority were conducted in China (n = 119) and the United States of America (n = 53). Across the n = 386 included studies, n = 15 instruments to measure resilience were identified and critically appraised. The scores for the instruments critically appraised ranged from 0 to 6 out of a total possible score of 11. Synthesis of results examined instrument development, instrument features and application of instruments.
Critical appraisal of the instruments used to measure nurse resilience revealed significant deficiencies. None of the instruments included all of the key attributes and factors that influence nurse resilience. There was a predominant focus on individual factors and little consideration of the influence of nursing work environments. Due to the shortcomings of the existing instruments, there are currently substantial limitations in our understanding of nurse resilience and how to measure it.
A profession-specific comprehensive measure of nurse resilience needs to be developed to better capture the attributes of nurse resilience.
This review highlights the limitations of instruments applied to measure nurse resilience.
The JBI scoping review framework.
No patient or public contribution.
To evaluate the effect of mutuality on self-care in people with CHD and the contribution of their caregivers, and whether such relationships can be mediated by self-efficacy.
Secondary analysis of baseline data from a multi-centre longitudinal study.
Patients at the onset of coronary artery disease who underwent angioplasty, along with their caregivers, were included in the sample. Data from 136 patients and 136 caregivers were used for the analysis. Mutuality between patients and caregivers was measured using the Mutuality Scale. Self-care was measured using the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Index and the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Index. The actor–partner interdependence mediation models were used to assess the mediating role of self-efficacy for self-care between perceived mutuality and self-care behaviours.
An actor indirect effect was found between patient mutuality and their self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management, through the mediation of their self-efficacy. Caregiver mutuality had a positive indirect effect on their contribution to self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management, through the mediation of their self-efficacy. Caregiver mutuality had a positive indirect effect on patient self-care maintenance and on patient self-care monitoring, through the mediation of patient self-efficacy. All models demonstrated satisfactory fit to the data.
Mutuality between patients and caregivers enhances self-care behaviours in patients with coronary heart disease, and self-efficacy is a crucial mediator in this relationship. Interventions targeting both mutuality and self-efficacy within patient–caregiver dyads may improve self-care outcomes.
We adhered to STROBE guidelines.
Patients and members of the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
To develop and validate the End-of-Life Care Assessment Tool for Dementia (EoLC-ATD).
A methodological study with multiple phases.
Five sub-studies comprising: a review of 90 validated dementia measures to compile an item bank of advanced dementia symptoms; focus groups with registered nurses on advanced dementia symptom identification and relevance of item bank inclusions; Delphi surveys with dementia experts seeking consensus on the EoLC-ATD constructs and items; pilot testing of the EoLC-ATD; and field testing of the EoLC-ATD in persons with dementia.
The item-bank included 180 symptoms, most of which focus group nurses (n = 17) identified as occurring in advanced dementia. Delphi surveys with dementia experts (n = 31) achieved 70% consensus for 25 of 26 EoLC-ATD items. Pilot testing of the EoLC-ATD by two nurses in eight persons with dementia showed good agreement for six constructs (Cohen's Kappa 0.856–0.927) and 26 items (Cronbach's alpha 77.0). An ‘other sympto’ item was included following RN recommendation. The 27-item EoLC-ATD field tested by 17 nurses in persons with dementia (n = 113) accurately identified advanced dementia symptoms (Cronbach's alpha 77.0, p < 0.001). Mortality at 180 days after baseline EoLC-ATD was significant (p < 0.001, area under the ROC curve p = 0.769).
The EoLC-ATD accurately and reliably identified symptoms of advanced dementia.
The EoLC-ATD provides registered nurses with a single measure of advanced dementia symptoms that will help in identifying symptom-responsive palliative care requirements.
The EoLC-ATD will address the current lack of a validated dementia symptom measure for use by aged care home registered nurses to identify unique palliative and end-of-life care needs according to presenting symptoms in persons living with advanced dementia.
STROBE Statement for cohort and mixed methods studies.
An eight-member Expert Advisory Group, which provided guidance and advice throughout the study, was composed of three carers of persons living with dementia, two dementia care clinicians, a dementia care clinical educator, and two dementia clinician researchers.
The 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) marks a pivotal shift in biomedical research ethics, with significant implications for nursing research. This paper critically evaluates the Declaration's relevance to nursing practice, with particular attention to challenges in low-resource settings. Key updates emphasising global health equity, environmental sustainability, participant-centred consent and artificial intelligence (AI) governance are examined through nursing's ethical lenses of justice, beneficence and patient advocacy.
Using a multidimensional ethical framework grounded in Virtue Ethics, utilitarianism and phenomenology, the manuscript explores how nurses can ethically engage vulnerable populations, safeguard data privacy and advance inclusive, community-based research.
It highlights gaps in the Declaration, particularly regarding algorithmic bias and digital consent and proposes practical strategies for nurse researchers, such as AI governance tools, dynamic consent models and context-sensitive sustainability practices.
Rather than treating ethics as an abstract principle, the paper grounds theory in real-world practice, offering case examples that reflect the lived constraints of nursing researchers in underfunded and culturally diverse environments. By aligning ethical ideals with operational realities, this work reinforces nursing's critical role in shaping equitable and ethically resilient research practices under the revised Declaration.
To explore the characteristics of oral healthcare education interventions for stroke clinicians and the effectiveness of these interventions in improving the oral health knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and practice among acute stroke clinicians.
Scoping review, guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework.
Original full-text studies reporting educational oral healthcare interventions for stroke clinicians, including but not limited to nurses, were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were extracted and appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist aligned to the study methodology. Narrative synthesis was used to describe heterogeneous findings.
Key electronic bibliographic databases including CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest, Pubmed, and Scopus, in addition to grey literature, were searched for studies published between 1st January 2000 and 20th January 2024.
Five studies conducted in acute inpatient settings were included: two randomised controlled trials, two mixed-methods studies, and one quality improvement project. Most (n = 4) studies developed complex interventions that included education and other components (products, referral pathways, assessment tools), and were delivered either face-to-face or as an online program. Most studies reported positive changes in oral health knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. There was limited measurement of the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions, with only one study reporting positive feedback from clinicians. There was no evidence to support changes in clinical practice following any of the included interventions.
Existing evidence indicates interventions for stroke clinicians have some potential for building stroke clinicians' capacity to provide adequate oral healthcare. There is however no evidence linking these interventions to optimised patient outcomes. There is a need for research focused on the implementation and dissemination of tailored oral health educational interventions incorporating clinically meaningful outcomes.
Existing oral healthcare educational interventions appear to have a positive effect on stroke clinicians' oral health knowledge, confidence, and attitudes. Educational interventions in oral healthcare are perceived to be acceptable and feasible; however, further research is needed to design and test the effect of new interventions.
Integrated oral healthcare is particularly important for stroke survivors who are at greater risk of preventable aspiration pneumonia. This scoping review highlights the characteristics of existing educational programs for stroke clinicians, their effectiveness, and gaps in existing evidence. Review findings substantiate the need for future research to enhance existing oral healthcare interventions, to translate knowledge acquired from training into clinical practice, and to capture appropriate measures of effect.
The PRISMA-ScR Checklist.
This review was registered with the Open Science Framework registry (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4BWVF).
To investigate clinicians' views on barriers and facilitators to implementing pressure injury prevention guideline recommendations for nutrition assessment and treatment, and de-implementing inappropriate alternating pressure air mattress allocation.
A qualitative descriptive study adhering to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.
We conducted face-to-face or videoconference focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews with clinicians recruited from a metropolitan tertiary hospital. Participants were purposively sampled according to their years of clinical practice. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed inductively to derive barriers and facilitators to guideline uptake. These were then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework and behaviour change techniques to inform an evidence-based implementation intervention development to improve guideline uptake.
Thirteen nurses, four occupational therapists and three dietitians were interviewed. Six themes illustrate three guideline-specific barriers and three common facilitators influencing nutrition- and mattress-related guideline uptake. The three barriers were: (1) nurses devalue the use of validated tools in nutrition screening; (2) nurses prioritise vital-sign-related nursing duties over feeding assistance according to clinical urgency; and (3) nurses consider air mattresses a preventative strategy irrespective of patient PI risks. Facilitators to improve guideline uptake were: (1) nurse-led interdisciplinary collaboration, (2) carer involvement and (3) easily accessible updated guidelines. Different Theoretical Domains Framework domains and behaviour change techniques were mapped to the identified nutrition- and mattress-related barriers.
The findings highlight three key nurses' attitudinal barriers to nutrition- and mattress-related guideline uptake, which inform the development of theory- and end-user-informed implementation interventions in pressure injury prevention.
An implementation strategical plan that addresses attitudinal barriers to improving guideline uptake for nutrition assessment and treatment and reducing air mattress overprescription appears critical in developing an intervention to enhance value-based practice, which will need to be evaluated in future trials.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Background
Older adults from specific racial and ethnic minoritized groups experience disproportionately higher asthma prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. They also often use emergency departments (EDs) to manage their asthma. High-quality primary care can improve asthma control and prevent ED use. Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide an increasing proportion of primary care to minoritized patients, yet often, they work in poor work environments that strain NP care.
Objectives
We examined whether racial and ethnic health disparities in ED visits among older adults with asthma are moderated by the NP work environment in primary care practices.
Methods
In 2018–2019, we used a cross-sectional design to collect survey data on NP work environments from 1,244 NPs in six geographically diverse states (i.e., Arizona, California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington). We merged the survey data with 2018 Medicare claims data from 46,658 patients with asthma to assess the associations of all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, ED visits with NPs’ work environment, and race and ethnicity using logistic regression.
Results
More than one third of patients with asthma visited the ED in 1 year, and a quarter of them had an ambulatory care-sensitive condition ED visit. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely than White patients to have all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive condition ED visits. NP work environment moderated the association of race with all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive condition ED visits among patients with asthma. Greater standardized NP work environment scores were associated with lower odds of all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive condition ED visits between Black and White patients.
Discussion
Disparities in ED visits between Black and White patients with asthma decrease when these patients receive care in care clinics with more favorable NP work environments. Preventing unnecessary ED visits among older adults with asthma is a likely benefit of favorable NP work environments. As the NP workforce grows, creating favorable work environments for NPs in primary care is vital for narrowing the health disparity gap.
To develop and validate a screening tool to identify patients with cardiovascular disease at risk of poor oral health and requiring referrals.
This study was part of a larger pilot study involving a cross-sectional survey and an oral health assessment conducted with patients with cardiovascular disease.
A four-item screening tool was developed by an expert panel and validated through a cross-sectional survey of patients with cardiovascular disease. The survey contained the tool and the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) (first gold standard). Additionally, all survey participants were provided a clinical oral health assessment (second gold standard). Sensitivity and specificity analysis was undertaken comparing the tool to the two gold standards to assess patients with cardiovascular disease at risk of poor oral health.
Three hundred and twenty-one participants completed the cross-sectional survey and eighty nine undertook the oral health assessment. Results from both approaches showed that the tool had high sensitivities (OHIP-14 = 89%, Oral assessment = 88%) and low specificities (OHIP-14 = 33% and Oral assessment = 24%).
The four-item screening tool is a simple and valid tool to identify patients with cardiovascular disease at risk of poor oral health and requiring a dental referral. The tool could be incorporated into routine practice of nurses across various cardiac settings.
To identify best practices to prevent violence against healthcare workers by patients at risk for aggression in the adult inpatient setting.
An integrative review.
Conducted using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals Model. Title and abstract screening on 4186 articles resulted in 156 for full text review. Full text screening yielded 14 articles that met inclusion criteria.
A search of the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and JBI from January 2019 to February 2023.
The review revealed behavioural intervention teams, environmental changes, and coordinated communication plans were the most used strategies, however none demonstrated significant decreases in violence.
Health systems can implement strategies shown to decrease the incidence of violence in healthcare settings globally. Lack of consistency in the evidence suggests the need for further research to assess mitigating strategies for violence against healthcare workers in inpatient hospital settings.
Patient safety is a cornerstone of nursing practice; however, healthcare workers need to feel safe in their work environment. Violent events are chronically underreported, ill defined, and when reported, do not address change in the practice setting. Identifying strategies to address escalating behaviour before it results in violence is crucial for everyone's safety.
This integrative review exposes the scarcity of evidence available to address rising concerns about patients on healthcare provider violence (Type II) in the workplace. Although several assessment tools for identifying violent patients exist, evidence regarding prevention is woefully absent. The review highlights potential interventions for further study to equip healthcare workers to manage patients safely and effectively before an escalation occurs.
PRISMA checklist for integrative reviews.
No patient or public contribution was part of this review.
To describe self-care in Italian adults with coronary heart disease and to identify sociodemographic and clinical determinants of self-care.
This is a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Italian multicentre longitudinal study.
We used the follow instruments: Self-Care of coronary heart disease inventory, Self-care Self Efficacy Scale, Charlson Comorbidity Index and Sociodemographic questionnaire. Descriptive statistics including absolute numbers, percentages, means and standard deviations were used to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample, and the items. A structural equation model was fitted to understand sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with self-care, and possible effects mediated by self-efficacy.
We enrolled 427 patients. Self-care maintenance, monitoring, management and self-care self-efficacy means scores were 58.27 (SD = 20.07), 48.53 (SD = 26.97), 65.34 (SD = 22.85) and 77.16 (SD = 20.76), respectively. Except for the self-care self-efficacy scale, all the scores lay below the cut off 70 for adequacy. Older age, higher comorbidities, a higher number of stents placed, and the presence of a caregiver predicted poor self-care.
Self-care in Italian CHD populations is poor. Several associations were found between the dimensions of self-care and sociodemographic factors. Implications for the profession these findings are important for health care providers to plan interventions to improve self-care behaviour.
The study addressed self-care behaviours of coronary heart disease patients. Self-care was poor in this population; several associations were found between the dimensions of self-care and sociodemographic and clinical determinants. Our results can be used to support health professionals in planning interventions to improve specific self-care domains.
STROBE checklist was followed.
To use machine learning to examine health equity and clinical outcomes in patients who experienced a nurse sensitive indicator (NSI) event, defined as a fall, a hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) or a hospital-acquired infection (HAI).
This was a retrospective observational study from a single academic hospital over six calendar years (2016–2021). Machine learning was used to examine patients with an NSI compared to those without.
Inclusion criteria: all adult inpatient admissions (2016–2021). Three approaches were used to analyze the NSI group compared to the No-NSI group. In the univariate analysis, descriptive statistics, and absolute standardized differences (ASDs) were employed to compare the demographics and clinical variables of patients who experienced a NSI and those who did not experience any NSIs. For the multivariate analysis, a light grading boosting machine (LightGBM) model was utilized to comprehensively examine the relationships associated with the development of an NSI. Lastly, a simulation study was conducted to quantify the strength of associations obtained from the machine learning model.
From 163,507 admissions, 4643 (2.8%) were associated with at least one NSI. The mean, standard deviation (SD) age was 59.5 (18.2) years, males comprised 82,397 (50.4%). Non-Hispanic White 84,760 (51.8%), non-Hispanic Black 8703 (5.3%), non-Hispanic Asian 23,368 (14.3%), non-Hispanic Other 14,284 (8.7%), and Hispanic 30,271 (18.5%). Race and ethnicity alone were not associated with occurrence of an NSI. The NSI group had a statistically significant longer length of stay (LOS), longer intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and was more likely to have an emergency admission compared to the group without an NSI. The simulation study results demonstrated that likelihood of NSI was higher in patients admitted under the major diagnostic categories (MDC) associated with circulatory, digestive, kidney/urinary tract, nervous, and infectious and parasitic disease diagnoses.
In this study, race/ethnicity was not associated with the risk of an NSI event. The risk of an NSI event was associated with emergency admission, longer LOS, longer ICU-LOS and certain MDCs (circulatory, digestive, kidney/urinary, nervous, infectious, and parasitic diagnoses).
Machine learning methodologies provide a new mechanism to investigate NSI events through the lens of health equity/disparity. Understanding which patients are at higher risk for adverse outcomes can help hospitals improve nursing care and prevent NSI injury and harm.
The utility and uptake of pain management interventions across intensive care settings is inconsistent. A rapid realist review was conducted to synthesise the evidence for the purpose of theory building and refinement.
A five-step iterative process was employed to develop project scope/ research questions, collate evidence, appraise literature, synthesise evidence and interpret information from data sources.
Realist synthesis method was employed to systematically review literature for developing a programme theory.
Initial searches were undertaken in three electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINHAL and OVID. The review was supplemented with key articles from bibliographic search of identified articles. The first 200 hits from Google Scholar were screened.
Three action-oriented themes emerged as integral to successful implementation of pain management interventions. These included health facility actions, unit/team leader actions and individual nurses' actions.
Pain assessment interventions are influenced by a constellation of factors which trigger mechanisms yielding effective implementation outcomes.
The results have implications on policy makers, health organisations, nursing teams and nurses concerned with optimising the successful implementation of pain management interventions.
The review enabled formation of a programme theory concerned with explaining how to effectively implement pain management interventions in intensive care.
This review was informed by RAMESES publication standards for realist synthesis.
No patient or public contribution.
The study protocol was registered in Open Science Framework.
To synthesise the literature about transgender and non-binary people's experiences of cervical cancer screening and identify ways to improve screening.
Transgender people often face barriers to accessing health services including cervical screening, where transgender people have a lower uptake than cisgender women.
A scoping review was undertaken following the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) framework and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Following database searching of Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and CINHAL, 23 papers published between 2008 and 2003 were included. Papers were included if they shared trans and non-binary people's experiences of cervical screening and were written in English. There were no date or geographical data restrictions due to the paucity of research.
Transgender people experience barriers to cervical screening including gender dysphoria, a history of sexual trauma, and mistrust in health professionals or health services, which can result in having negative experiences of screening or avoiding screening. Health professionals can help to create a positive experience by informing themselves about best practices for trans+ health.
Changes are required to improve transgender people's experiences and uptake of cervical screening. Improving medical education about trans health and updating health systems would help to combat issues discussed.
Having an understanding of the reasons why accessing health services can be more difficult for transgender people will help health professionals to provide appropriate care for transgender patients. This paper details this in the context of cervical cancer screening and can be applied to other areas of healthcare.
We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and used the PRISMA-ScR reporting method. No Patient or Public Contribution.
This study aimed to examine (a) changes in coping strategies and vicarious post-traumatic growth (VPTG) across three timepoints of the COVID-19 pandemic among nurses; (b) discrete groups of nurses with unique coping profiles and (c) the association of these coping profiles with VPTG across the timepoints.
Although literature abounds with the negative mental health consequences of the pandemic among healthcare professionals, much less is known about the positive consequences on nurses, the coping strategies that they use, and how these change over time.
This was a cross-sectional web-based survey at three timepoints during the pandemic.
A sample of 429 nurses completed online the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) and the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (COPE) to measure vicarious post-traumatic growth (VPTG) and coping strategies, respectively. The STROBE checklist was used to report the present study.
Significantly higher VPTG scores were observed during the third timepoint. Different coping strategies were employed across the three timepoints. Nurses responded to the pandemic either with an active, an avoidant or a passive coping profile. Significantly higher VPTG levels were reported by the nurses of the active profile compared to those of the passive profile, whereas the difference between active and avoidant profiles was not significant.
Notwithstanding the preponderance of the nurses with the active coping profile in achieving high VPTG, the avoidant copers had more gains (VPTG) than the passive copers, suggesting that doing something to cope with the stressor—let it be trying to avoid it—was better than doing nothing.
The identification of distinct coping profiles among nurses and their association with VPTG is of particular use to policymakers and practitioners in developing tailored prevention and intervention efforts to help the nurses effectively manage the demands of the pandemic.
No patient or public contribution since the study was exclusively conducted by the authors.
FreshRSS